User talk:Roseveitch

Welcome!

Hello, Roseveitch, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Roseveitch/sandbox/Youth Hub Hull, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Megan B.... ^{It’s all coming to me} till the end of time 18:22, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Roseveitch/sandbox/Youth Hub Hull

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Roseveitch/sandbox/Youth Hub Hull, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Megan B.... ^{It’s all coming to me} till the end of time 18:22, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.Deb (talk) 18:26, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Youth Hub Hull (December 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Idoghor Melody were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

You can't use Wikipedia to source Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Youth Hub Hull and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Youth Hub Hull, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 12:51, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Roseveitch! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 12:51, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Youth Hub Hull (December 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Youth Hub Hull and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Youth Hub Hull, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 14:26, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Youth Hub Hull

Hello Roseveitch,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Youth Hub Hull for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bensci54 (talk) 17:34, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 18:43, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Roseveitch (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, the block is no longer necessary because I understand what I am being blocked for, I will not do it again, and I will make productive contributions. I really am trying to write properly and I am seeking further guidance to help me do this. Kind regards, Rose. Roseveitch (talk) 16:16, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You won't be unblocked to further edit about your organization in the short term. If that is your only goal here, this is the end of the road. If you are interested in being a general contributor and editing about topics unrelated to your conflict of interest, please tell what those might be. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 18:53, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Roseveitch (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

hello, thank you for getting back in touch. You have made an assumption that isn't true and have disregarded my reason quite unfairly. I am beginner to this site and I am trying my best to make positive contributions to the site. I think the unblock should be considered as it is reasonable. I understand that what I tried to contribute for this site isn't suitable, and I can confirm that I won't do it again. Could you please unblock my account. I will only read what is on Wikipedia to understand it better and won't contribute for a period of time. I have learned from it and feel as though I have addressed the issue. I appreciate your feedback to guide me. I am not editing maliciously and would like to be a general contributor and edit topics unrelated to my conflict of interest in the near future. Thank you. kind regards, Rose. Roseveitch (talk) 08:38, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:31, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What topics and pages do you intend to edit if unblocked? SQL ^{Query Me!} 08:47, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I would edit pages that I am passionate about in my region, such as businesses that I wouldn't have a conflict of interest in. I also like theatre and music. I would like to make edits when necessary in the near future as my confidence grows with this site. Kind regards, Rose.

Only one open request is needed at a time; subsequent comment should be standard, unformatted comments like this. 331dot (talk) 09:33, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you create multiple unblock requests at the same time again, I will revoke your access to this page.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:41, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am not creating multiple unblock requests on purpose. I am trying to reply to the thread. You are very rude and I can see that you have no intention of helping me. Please don't contact me any further as you are very unpleasant. I will be contacting someone else to deal with this issue. Kind regards, Rose.

Forbidding the admin who blocked you and could remove the block from communicating with you does not seem to be a wise strategy. 331dot (talk) 08:14, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Rose! So you've had a bit of a rocky start here. Creating articles is not a good project for very new editors, as it can pretty quickly get you in trouble if you don't understand how we do things. I am willing to discuss unblocking so that you can learn to edit, but I do have to say that when multiple experienced editors are trying to help you, rather than assuming you understand everything that's going on, assume you don't. For instance, above, Bbb23 was asking you not to create multiple unblock tickets, as those cause extra work for other editors. He maybe could have been a little more patient with someone so new to Wikipedia that they don't yet know how to sign their posts, but what he was telling you was simply that if you didn't stop doing something disruptive on your talk page, he would revoke your access.

If you're unblocked, what I would recommend is that you do the tutorial at WP:Wikipedia Adventure and go do something besides trying to create an article from scratch. Fix typos, add sources, etc. There's plenty to do. If you are interested in the area around Hull, the article Kingston upon Hull needs attention. Is that something you'd be interested in doing to help you learn to edit?

To sign your posts, type four tildes (like this: ~~~~), which appends your username and a timestamp. It also makes your username and talk page clickable to make it easy for people to leave messages for you. —valereee (talk) 15:38, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]