User talk:Rosemary yin
| This user is a student editor in University_of_California,_Berkeley/African_Politics_(Spring_2020) . |
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Rosemary yin, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:44, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
Kunta's Peer Review
[edit]Lead: Precise introduction and you outlined the main purpose of the Peace and Security Council of the African Union. However, I would suggest adding (Headquarters of African Union ) next to Addis Ababa even though you may have it at the reference page at the bottom. Because when you hover the pointer over (Addis Ababa) it only gives you the information about the city which is ok, but have no direct relation to African Union Peace and Security Council. So I think it will be a good addition to state the significance.
Members: While the members you listed are accurate but I would suggest listing the most recent one from the AU website peaceau.org has the latest composition of the Peace and Security Council of the African Union.
Peace Support Operation: I really love the list of the missions undertaken or still going on. If you want, you can add the ECOMIG mission in The Gambia which is still on. This mission was deployed following the Gambian 2016 presidential election.
Fair and Balance: Although this is an existing article, but you had done an excellent job putting in great addition to the article making it substantial for the readers. I see no point to suggest otherwise, so therefore no comment on neutrality.
Sources: Again excellent job! The link are easily assessible for further perusal at the readers choice. Overall: This is an excellent work and your structural organization is awesome! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nna Bankoo (talk • contribs) 20:16, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
Leo Melton's Peer Review
[edit]Lead: good lead, goes over important information clearly and concisely.
Structure: Good structure overall. It's a dense article, but the content is laid out in a logical fashion. Generally easy to navigate and nothing seems out of place.
Balance: really good balance in the article, all of the sections you've completed seem really robust and include a lot of information without too much irrelevant info. Lots of quotes and information direclty from sources thorough the article.
Neutral Tone: You utilized information and quotes from these sources really well, so the article feels authoritative and complete. Generally has a clinical tone that doesn't come off as biased.
Sources:Really good selection of sources. A lot of sources from academic journals and directly from the organizations in question. At 9, there's also a wide range of sources.
Mordian (talk) 06:54, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Non-free content
[edit]Hi - I saw that you used a lot of quotes in your content. This posed a copyright issue since we can only use a relatively small amount of non-free content and in very specific ways. You should summarize content into your own words whenever possible. If it cannot be summarized into your own words it's important to examine whether or not the material should be in the article - keep in mind that there will be some content that will be too detailed for Wikipedia's purposes, as we should only have a general overview of the topic. For example, rather than noting every requirement for a member we can just say something like "Members must meet criteria that is laid out in the Council's bylaws". It's sort of a given that members on a Council will need to meet specific requirements - the only time we really need to list them is if the requirements have received a lot of coverage in independent and reliable sources. Hope this helps! Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:40, 19 April 2020 (UTC)