User talk:Ron3000001

Horne Hybrid Reactor moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Horne Hybrid Reactor, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 19:36, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Horne Hybrid Reactor has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Horne Hybrid Reactor. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 04:30, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Horne Hybrid Reactor (April 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiDan61 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Citations verify that research has been done in this area, but there are no legitimate citations in reliable sources to indicate whether Horne has successfully implemented this technology. Without such verification, there is no way to know if this is a legitimate breakthrough, or something else.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Horne Hybrid Reactor and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Horne Hybrid Reactor, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:27, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ron3000001! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:27, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Horne Hybrid Reactor has been accepted

Horne Hybrid Reactor, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

— Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 16:37, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Un-accepted

The article you recently created, Horne Hybrid Reactor, had an improper review and is not ready to remain published. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of Draft: before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ☆ Bri (talk) 23:13, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Horne Hybrid Reactor

Hello, Ron3000001. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Horne Hybrid Reactor".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:30, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Ron3000001! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Djm-leighpark (talk) 05:55, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Hello, Ron3000001. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Pragmatically it seems possible that you may have an undisclosed connection with the Horne Hybrid Reactor / Horne Technologies and there is a requirement to disclose an affiliation in a manner acceptable to Wikipedia. However that does not override a requirement to disclose personal information or any personal information that could identify you, see also e.g. WP:DOX. Please follow the links in this warning and consider at best simply replying yes or no to this warning, please minimize and additional information. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 06:23, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Djm-leighpark I am a fusion enthusiast that is not associated with the Horne group, but I am struggling to find additional references for this article and using wikipedia in general. Is there a way to solicit additional members to work on the article without publishing it?

The key thing is to identity WP:THREE sources that are WP:RS and clearly identify Horne Technologies. (Park et. al. 2014) may be suitable except they don't mention Horne Technologies. [1] would be a good source if it was peer reviewed WP:RS, and aas far as I can tell it isn't. If there are no (min 2 but ideally 3) WP:RS it isn't suitable for WikiPedia. Thankyou.Djm-leighpark (talk) 22:55, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Horne Hybrid Reactor

Hello, Ron3000001. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Horne Hybrid Reactor".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:40, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]