User talk:Roleplayer/Archive08

Bristol City F.C.

I recently added a note to the bristol city site in regards to a game that was played but you have deleted my entry. please can you explain why —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dustonbadboys (talk • contribs) 23:46, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

You added nothing of the sort. You went through the article changing "city" to "shity". Carry on with that kind of behaviour and you will be blocked from editing. -- role^player 23:49, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Yeah i know i did that and it was wrong of me. I appologise —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dustonbadboys (talk • contribs) 23:58, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Your bot

Hi, I don't know if this was deliberate but your bot User:Mr.Z-bot just created a page at Mr.Z-bot/errors. I've marked it for speedy deletion, I just thought I'd let you know. -- role^player 03:51, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Deleted.. Mr.Z-man 03:57, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Warball

Hello,

Warball is a new trading card game. It is similar to other trading card games that have articles on Wiki like Magic the Gathering. Why are we flagged that we are advertising?

Thanks, Michael —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.180.176.96 (talk) 06:11, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Because it was written in an advertising style inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you look at the article for Magic: the Gathering it does not advertise the product at all, it describes it in a neutral, encyclopedic way. All your article did was to publicise a new product. Please also see the guidelines on notability before you post anything else. Thank you. -- role^player 12:15, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Cool Hand Nuke

Good Afternoon,

This response given respectfully. I saw your note on Cool Hand Nuke and to address your point of googling to see our returns and noting 8 links I will reference the actual entry created where it was stated that the site is in alpha development moving to beta on January 19th, 2009. Rarely will a new entity in alpha development have any kind of link return on any of the engines. The exceptions being those who are extremely well funded by VC or have a major name/benefactor involved in some way. Please take this into consideration or let me know who I need to speak further on this matter. Thank you.TheMadFam (talk) 22:49, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

I am afraid you're not helping your cause by telling me that the website in question hasn't even gone live yet. Wikipedia is not a place that lists every single website that has ever been created. Neither is it a business directory, nor is it a web directory. It is an encyclopedia, and as such it only lists items of proven notability, that can be verified using reliable sources. The subject matter you are writing about can do none of those things, and as such, I'm afraid it does not have a place on Wikipedia.

When you are able to demonstrate that the subject has notability, using reliable third party sources that can verify that claim, then by all means come back and post again. -- role^player 22:55, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Respectfully, an encyclopedia is a compendium of knowledge and I agree with you - People go there to learn about something. We are opening up the site for beta on Monday the 19th. As far as notability goes, I can expound upon this if need be but the shortest most relevant piece of information would be the facebook fanpage[1] which has the logo, the site description, mission and vision. It was launched a couple of weeks ago and has ~27 fans already, this for a site that has not yet allowed access to anyone. There is also a [facebook group]http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=41880864491&ref=ts dedicated to the site which has ~15 fans. And if you explore them memberships of both you will see that there is limited cross-over between them i.e. the total is north of 30 people. I have statistics showing north of .5M impressions for the fan page & with 50% of the nuclear workforce retirement eligible in the next 10 years, I can assure you that we are relevant if for no other reason that a grand entrance or grand failure is in progress. I understand that we may not agree on this and if that is the case then I respectfully request that this be escalated to the next level for consideration & that a real world phone conversation take place. Virtual worlds are wonderful but they're not always the best medium for communication. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheMadFam (talk • contribs) 23:25, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

I am afraid relevance is not the issue here, notability is, and facebook is not evidence of notability. I can understand you are not accepting what I am saying, and have asked for someone else to come in and help out here, I don't really know what else I can tell you. The site just isn't notable. Period. -- role^player 23:37, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Saga mountain

Note discussion originally carried out at Talk:Saga mountain. -- role^player 00:57, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

just wait a day...--Jcubed1 (talk) 22:53, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

This is the Saga Mountain webmaster, admin, and lead developer confirming this page as being needed, please, do not delete. --Cyclone103 (talk) 22:58, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

read_me Jcubed1 (talk) 22:58, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Alternatively, read me. Unless you can significantly improve the number of hits this online game is going to receive on google in 24 hours it doesn't have a place on Wikipedia. This is because it is non-notable web content, that is unable to verify its notability using external, reliable sources. Please see Wikipedia:First article for more information about creating your first article on Wikipedia. -- role^player 23:19, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

-clankercrusher: Would it be taboo if this artacle was delted, then another one was made, better, when the game is more popular and more ppl would veiw it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.155.175.184 (talk) 23:46, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

If you can satisfy the notability criteria at a future date, then by all means come back and post again, that's fine. -- role^player 23:51, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

k, that will probably happen--Jcubed1 (talk) 23:52, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

I am indexing as many relevant pages of my site into the Google Search engine as I can, please be patient (in the Search Wiki). I am using a sitemap modification for FluxBB (the forum program) which generates a sitemap based upon forum content. It has over 70 pages submitted, yet only 6 have been indexed. Also, you did not check this google search tool to see all indexed pages. Adding metadata takes time you know...I would not be surprised if it were a few weeks before we could remake this page, should it be deleted. You know, we have had over 11000 pageviews? If you do not believe me, I can send you a PDF file of the google analytics stats.--Cyclone103 (talk) 23:57, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

really? wow, thats alot of veiws. I did not know that...-clankercrusher —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.155.175.184 (talk) 00:32, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Don't waste your time unnecessarily. The google test is just an initial test that new page patrol use to easily verify notability. You need external reliable sources that others can easily consult to verify your claim of notability. -- role^player 00:34, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

do you have any recommendations for a good tool that does such? thx for your time.-clankercrusher —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.155.175.184 (talk) 00:39, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

No tool, just become notable. Wait until other independent reliable people or organisations have critically reviewed it (blogs written by your friends don't count, neither do facebook, myspace or bebo). Wait for news articles about it, or reviews by leading game sites.

If there really was a tool that could produce that kind of stuff, don't you think that everything would be notable enough for a Wikipedia article? I'm afraid in this instance you'll just have to accept for the moment that it just isn't notable. -- role^player 00:47, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

uh admin, could you delete my discussions posts? thx, it wont let me.(including this one)

The discussion will be deleted when the page gets deleted. In the meantime, please leave it where it is, the closing admin will need to see it to make sure it has taken place. Finally, please stop replacing your ip with 00.000.000.000, it's not helpful, and it's not constructive. -- role^player 00:51, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Besorah is a plagiarized copy of The Scriptures 1998

Hi Pamela Stanford - the publisher of The Besorah does not deny this FACT. She asked the ISR for permission to consult the text of the ISR 1998 edition, but she copied it with only a font change to paleo hebrew. A case of copyright infringement is being prepared at the moment. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Billmeyer777 (talk • contribs) 23:58, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Hi, unless you are able to prove that her text is plagiarism, using external reliable sources that others can consult to verify your claim it has no place on Wikipedia. -- role^player 00:29, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

u suck

u suck —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.158.132.62 (talk) 01:20, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for welcoming me :) GNRY09 (talk) 01:59, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

No problem. -- role^player 02:00, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Deletion review for CoolHandNuke

Just to let you know that re the exchange that has been taking place at TheMadFam's talk page I have left a message suggesting that they bring up their dissatisfaction at WP:ANI in as friendly terms as possible. Personally I doubt that anything will happen as a result, I'm doing it to be nice to a newbie. -- role^player 22:42, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Understood...I backed out of the conversation anywho...didn't seem constructive...--Smashville^talk 01:42, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Hi

WHO ARE YOU?? ARE YOU THE CREATOR WHO SENT ME THE NOTE?? FROM SARARED3 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarared3 (talk • contribs) 01:07, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I am the person who left the {{Welcome}} template on your user talk page. What can I do for you? -- role^player 12:20, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Roleplayer. You have new messages at OllieFury's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Fair use rationale for File:Tring.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Tring.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 23:32, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Apologies for that, I was unfamiliar with the rules. The original image had existed for more than two years without any of that supplementary information, I assumed it would be OK to leave it as is. Info added, crisis averted. -- role^player 23:49, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Speedy tagging

Thx.[2] I hate looking for the templates. --KP Botany (talk) 23:41, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

So do I, which is why I use Twinkle. -- role^player 23:50, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Re Confession (band)

Noted that the article says that they have released a CD with a record label, however if you check the list of bands on the record label's own website the band is not listed. Never mind the speedy, I have nominated it for AfD. Here's the discussion. -- role^player 23:59, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the note, but I think you're mistaken. They're a featured release of the company, whatever that means. I commented at the AfD. StarM 00:14, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

OK. Well I'm not familiar enough with WP:MUSIC either, so I'll just wait to see what happens at AfD. -- role^player 00:16, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Sounds like a plan, I'm not either which is why I didn't explicitly !vote. It's enough to avoid a speedy I think. Good luck with school. StarM 00:20, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Cheers. -- role^player 00:20, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Quaject deletion

Big thanks, I was struggling to do it, could you please have a look at the Quaject entry too, I am not sure everything is ok there too. ----Khalid hassani (talk) 00:17, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Done. -- role^player 16:15, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Redirect of Laveist

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Laveist, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Laveist is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Laveist, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 23:20, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Dannny Douberly

Is there any particular reason the original prod could not have been left to run its course? Cancelling the prod and taking it to afd only serves to extend the life of a bad article by a few days, as far as I can see. -- role^player 14:20, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

It is more likely that the article would be deleted sooner at AfD than through the prod. With the prod, it couldn't be deleted before 1/28. At Afd, it could be deleted almost immediately. Hoax articles tend to get deleted within a day at AfD. -- Mufka ^{(u) (t) (c)} 16:35, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

OK I shall rely on your experience of the system then! -- role^player 18:27, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Editing List of Croats

Dear Roleplayer!

Thanks for sending me your message! I erased the headline "Infamy" in the "List of Croats" by purpose, not by mistake. I would ask you to allow me to erase it again or ask you to be so kind to do it for me (which I would prefer). The reason why I did it is quite clear. I made a comparison with other Wikipedia sides from other countries concerning their lists of famous people and no one had such a list. I don't think it's appropriate to put such a subdivision in such a list, especially when it's transparent that such an input was done only to defame a country.

Thanks in advance! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.1.138.16 (talk) 11:40, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Hi, that's fine, the only reason I reverted you is that you were removing a large amount of content without an edit summary. Feel free to edit away, however please ensure you use edit summaries, particularly for large changes such as the one you did. -- role^player 13:54, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks a lot!

Dear Roleplayer!

Thanks a lot for your help and excuse me for taking irregular actions due to the lack of adding an explanation as I am new in this! Wish you a nice rest of the day! Take care! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.136.20.162 (talk) 16:28, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Munster (Footstar)

Why do you want my page deleted, what did we ever do to you!

Clearly a Hoopfiend Hooligan! —Preceding unsigned comment added by El-pietro (talk • contribs) 18:49, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

It's an article about a fictional club in a computer game. Exactly how does that meet the notability criteria? -- role^player 18:51, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Fictional perhaps, but each of the players are real, Footstar is a game where you train one player and play on teams together. Theres a small but dedicated community in footstar. Given time this could turn into a good series of pages. Munster currently have about 25 players, and there are around 150 Irish players, Ireland being one of the smaller countries with only 9 teams at the moment. El-pietro (talk) 19:14, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

It's just not notable, which is kind of the point. There is no possibility that a fictional team in a fictional universe in a computer game can ever be notable, whether it's made up of real people or not. Please refer to the notability criteria that I left on your user talk page before adding anything else. -- role^player 19:34, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

A9

Re your comment, "band has article", the band is currently not doing very well at AfD (not a single keep vote yet). So what do I do - do I add this to the AfD or create a new one? If the former how do I add it? -- role^player 22:05, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

You can make a note of it in the AFD - if the band's article is deleted, the albums are elidgible for deletion under A9, but not while the band has an article. I haven't looked at the AFD, so I can't say, but of course it's possible thing's'll swing after someone digs up sources or whatnot. WilyD 22:08, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Message from Popeyevilla (talk · contribs)

God you have a sad life......... you boring ejit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Popeyevilla (talk • contribs) 15:01, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

FUCK YOU

YOU FUCKING SUCK MAN HOW DARE YOU DELETE MY FUCKING SHIT I SPENT AGES WORKING ON THAT FUCKING SHIT AND YOU FUCKING DELETED IT YOU NFUCKING CUNT FUCK YOU—Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.158.132.204 (talk • contribs) 15:56, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Lovely. You are aware I'm not an admin and can't delete stuff, aren't you? -- role^player 16:05, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for your Welcome!

The page, I suggested for deletion (Michael Matthes) have had the same problem in de and fr. In German, it is o.k. but I'm not sure who to tell copyright violation in french. My german usersite is Lantus. Here on en you will find me very seldom. —Clausthal (talk) 10:46, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Hi, I'm afraid my French is not good enough for me to bring this up at French wiki, however I know another editor who is French, so I shall bring it up with him. Thank you for letting me know. -- role^player 10:49, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

thumbup —Clausthal (talk) 10:54, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

No problem. I have managed to work out how to bring it up at French wiki. I have marked it as such myself. -- role^player 10:59, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Template:Aylesbury

That's a good template- I was actually thinking of doing one for each Buckinghamshire district like Oxfordshire but maybe towns are a better idea. Maybe I'll do one for High Wycombe... Oliver Fury, Esq. message • contributions 00:38, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

I think there's possibly room for both. I got the inspiration after seeing Template:Oxford, and it was basically because there were a large number of articles for suburbs of Aylesbury, that I felt there was room for a template. But district ones work too. -- role^player 11:09, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Re my edit at Buckinghamshire

Apologies for re-adding info that was already included elsewhere, my concern was merely that an IP user was removing content without leaving an edit summary comment as to why. Now that you have explained the situation I can see that their intentions were solid and that it was indeed the right thing to do. -- role^player 11:57, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

No problem. ~ Scribble Monkey (talk) 12:16, 12 February 2009 (UTC)