User talk:RohithReddy1234

Welcome!

Hello, RohithReddy1234, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:RohithReddy1234, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Drm310 🍁 (talk) 16:32, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:RohithReddy1234

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:RohithReddy1234 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 16:32, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your user page may not meet Wikipedia's user page guidelines. It is intended for basic information about yourself, your interests and goals as they relate to editing Wikipedia, as well as disclosures of conflicts of interest and paid editing. Although a lot of freedom is allowed in personalizing your user page, it is not:

an encyclopedia article (and should not be styled to look like one)
a workspace for a draft article
a personal website, blog, or social media site
a space for self-promotion or other advertising
a CV, resumé or lengthy autobiography

The user page guidelines have additional information on what is and what is not considered acceptable content. Please use your user sandbox or the draft article space to practice editing or to create new articles. Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 16:33, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:RohithReddy1234

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:RohithReddy1234 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 19:25, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New users can be forgiven for not knowing all of Wikipedia's many policies and guidelines. However, users who continue to post inappropriate content after being notified will be shown less leniency. Please do not re-post content on your userpage that does not conform to the userpage guidelines. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 19:31, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:RohithReddy1234

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:RohithReddy1234 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 19:26, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jake Wartenberg (talk) 19:40, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RohithReddy1234 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sir, Good Morning. I have received this "You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines." Previously, I don't know about that why my User Page Edit option is blocked, I started reading all the guidelines. Then I realized that I have been violating the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

Priorly, I don't know about these guidelines sir. As the name says User Page, I thought that there should details of the User.

That is the only reason I wrote that content. But after reading all the guidelines. I got to know that what mistake i have done. So please kindly Unblock me for editing.

I will not repeat the mistake what i have commited before. I will keep all the guidelines and i follow accordingly.

I am requesting you sir, Really I don't about the mistake previously, but after reading the guidelines I got to know.

Thank you sir, for helping me in knowing the guidelines.

Please Unblock me sir, I will not commit this mistake again in the future.

Thanks & Regards

RohithReddy1234 RohithReddy1234 (talk) 01:32, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm curious as to why someone would assign you tasks to edit your sandbox, which is not a highly visible area unless one knows where to find it. You meet our definition of a paid editor(interns are paid editors even if they receive no money). Your project seems to involve Indic language Wikipedias so I'm wondering what you need to edit this one for. 331dot (talk) 08:02, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sir, Sorry for violating the conflict of interest and notability guidelines. Really I don't about these guidelines which I have been violating. If I know about them previously, definitely I would not commit this mistake.

" why someone would assign you tasks to edit your sandbox, which is not a highly visible area unless one knows where to find it. You meet our definition of a paid editor(interns are paid editors even if they receive no money). Your project seems to involve Indic language Wikipedias so I'm wondering what you need to edit this one for. "

Sir, what you have said makes sense. But as per our training I have to do what they say. They said that create and edit your own User Page and Sandbox pages also sir. But really sir, when I am writing that content I don't know these guidelines. If I know means I would not commit this mistake.

In training session they said this is the First week Assignment/Task. So that's why I created & edited. I thought that User Page means it contains all the data about the User. So that's why I wrote all about me.

Sorry sir, I will not commit this mistake again please sir Unblock me, In evening We are having meeting sir regarding training. I don't what they will be going to teach, if they teach about this and I can't Edit means I will Miss no sir.

Please it is Humble Request from my side please consider and help me with this sir.

Thanks & Regards

Rohith Reddy

If unblocked, what would you like to edit about? Jake Wartenberg (talk) 01:39, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, I am an Intern in IndicWiki Project led by IIIT Hyderabad. I have been assigned to some tasks to create article on Sandbox Page. But now I can't edit my Sandbox Pages also sir.

Sir, Please I am requesting you sir I will not commit the mistake again in Future, I had read all the guidelines and now I am aware of all the guidelines. I am having a meeting in the evening session regarding the IndicWiki Project. So please sir Unblock me. I will not commit the mistake again.

Thanks & Regards

RohithReddy1234 RohithReddy1234 (talk) 01:46, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, actually I commited a mistake by violating the guidelines. So sir now I am aware of all the guidelines and I want to rectify my mistake. Please understand me, This is the last time I will not commit the same mistake again, I will follow all the guidelines strictly and I will ensure you that I will not commit any mistakes like this in the future.

Thanks & Regards

RohithReddy1234 RohithReddy1234 (talk) 01:51, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, I am an Intern in IndicWiki Project led by IIIT Hyderabad. I have been assigned to some tasks to create article on Sandbox Page. But now I can't edit my Sandbox Pages also sir.

Sir, Please I am requesting you sir I will not commit the mistake again in Future, I had read all the guidelines and now I am aware of all the guidelines. I am having a meeting in the evening session regarding the IndicWiki Project. So please sir Unblock me. I will not commit the mistake again.

Sir, actually I commited a mistake by violating the guidelines. So sir now I am aware of all the guidelines and I want to rectify my mistake. Please understand me, This is the last time I will not commit the same mistake again, I will follow all the guidelines strictly and I will ensure you that I will not commit any mistakes like this in the future.

Thanks & Regards

RohithReddy1234 RohithReddy1234 (talk) 02:10, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not repeat the same comments - you will not receive a faster reply. Administrators are volunteers and will reply when they have time. They try to respond to everyone in a timely manner, but there is no service level agreement and no deadline. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 04:17, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, I understood that Administrators are volunteers and will reply when they have time. They try to respond to everyone in a timely manner, but there is no service level agreement and no deadline. Sir, Please I am requesting you sir I will not commit the mistake again in Future, I had read all the guidelines and now I am aware of all the guidelines. I am having a meeting in the evening session regarding the IndicWiki Project. So please sir Unblock me. I will not commit the mistake again.

Please kindly unblock my user page edit option.

Thanks & Regards

RohithReddy1234 RohithReddy1234 (talk) 04:29, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RohithReddy1234 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sir, Sorry for violating the conflict of interest and notability guidelines. Really I don't about these guidelines which I have been violating. If I know about them previously, definitely I would not commit this mistake. :" why someone would assign you tasks to edit your sandbox, which is not a highly visible area unless one knows where to find it. You meet our definition of a paid editor(interns are paid editors even if they receive no money). Your project seems to involve Indic language Wikipedias so I'm wondering what you need to edit this one for. " :Sir, what you have said makes sense. But as per our training I have to do what they say. They said that create and edit your own User Page and Sandbox pages also sir. But really sir, when I am writing that content I don't know these guidelines. If I know means I would not commit this mistake. :In training session they said this is the First week Assignment/Task. So that's why I created & edited. I thought that User Page means it contains all the data about the User. So that's why I wrote all about me. :Sorry sir, I will not commit this mistake again please sir Unblock me, In evening We are having meeting sir regarding training. I don't know what they will be going to teach, if they teach about this and I can't Edit means I will Miss no sir. :Please it is Humble Request from my side please consider and help me with this sir. :Thanks & Regards :Rohith Reddy

Decline reason:

Nothing here convinces me you'd refrain from further inappropriate edits if directed to do so. This is a good lesson for you. If directed by someone else to act unethically, you are morally obligated to refuse the order. Yamla (talk) 10:07, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

RohithReddy1234 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sir, Sorry for violating the conflict of interest and notability guidelines. Really I don't about these guidelines which I have been violating. If I know about them previously, definitely I would not commit this mistake. :"If directed by someone else to act unethically, you are morally obligated to refuse the order." Sorry sir, You misunderstood me. Actually they have given task to create User Page. But I thought User Page means it should show details about User. Due to lack of knowledge on Guidelines, I have commit this mistake. No one ordered me to do so, it was happened by mistakenly. :But after blocking I read all the guidelines and I understood that I have commit a mistake. I understood the mistake what I have commit. Please Unblock me for Editing. I will not commit mistake again. :I understood how my mistake effects me. I will not commit this again. It was the First and Last time. Please kindly help me sir.!!! As you Know sir, Mistakes are common in Human Life, Everyone learn from their mistakes. Please Forgive me for this time sir. :Please, Please, Please kindly Unblock me sir, I will not commit this mistake again. I requesting you sir, this is the last time, I will not do this mistake again sir. This is the last time I will not commit any mistake sir. :Please, Please, Please sir Unblock me. I will obey all the Guidelines from here on. Please Excuse me sir. I haven't commit this mistake wantedly. It was due to the lack of knowledge on Guidelines. Now I have got read all the Guidelines. :Thanks & Regards :Rohith Reddy

Accept reason:

As per below, the blocking admin has lifted the block. Happy editing, welcome back! Yamla (talk) 17:16, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have unblocked you. For the time being, please do not recreate your user page and do not move your sandbox into article space. I suggest asking the organizers of your project for closer guidance. You may also ask me for help on my talk page. Jake Wartenberg (talk) 17:15, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good Evening sir, I am sorry for what the misunderstanding caused.

I didn't do editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

Actually sir, I am an Intern at Project IndicWiki Organized by IIIT Hyderabad, as the part of Project they said to create an Engineering college wiki page. So that's why i have created it.

I didn't do as per my personnel interest sir, previously also I had been blocked for the same reason violating guidelines because at that time I don't the guidelines but I had read them. But this time they given Assignment. So please Unblock me. I will inform them as this is undergoes Violating Wiki guidelines. Please Sir, understand me and help me sir.

I will spread awareness regarding this among my friends and my fellow project interns as they also created like this.

Please sir unblock me sir. This time they said to create an Engineering college wiki page. They said that is just for information purpose and not for promotion or self advertisement purpose. This time I had followed them closely and then also I had been blocked please sir, Can you unblock me? RohithReddy1234 (talk) 16:34, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:27, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RohithReddy1234 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sir Good Afternoon,

The block is no longer necessary because I understand what I am blocked for, I will not do it again, and I will make productive contributions instead.

I understood the mistake i had commited, and I will not commit the mistake again. This is my last and final mistake, Please consider me and allow me once for this time, I will not commit any mistakes further like this, As you know I am an New-Comer, I may commit the mistakes in the beginning but gradually understanding the rules and guidelines I changed myself and not to commit any mistakes further in the Future, So please consider my request.

As you are in the judge position whether to allow me or not to allow me, I think you help me for this last one time, I will mark your words and learn from you and mistakes i had commited.

Thanks & Regards

RohithReddy1234 RohithReddy1234 (talk) 06:43, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Duplicate request. 331dot (talk) 07:58, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RohithReddy1234 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am really sorry for violating Wiki Guidelines.

I am asking you to please unblock me.

The block is no longer necessary because I understand what I am blocked for, I will not do it again, and I will make productive contributions instead.

Sorry sir violating the procedure for appealing blocks.

From here on I will never do such kind f things again, I will follow all the guidelines, Not only me I will spread awareness regarding this among my friends and my fellow project interns.

As I am an Project Intern, the Project incharge asked me why I am blocked, then I explained about all the things and the mistake what I have commited.

As this is clearly a mis-understanding about the task given. So that's the mistake happen.

So please kindly Unblock me for this last time.

I am requesting you for this time. I understand what I am blocked for, I will not do it again, and I will make productive contributions instead.

Thanks & Regards

RohithReddy1234 RohithReddy1234 (talk) 04:11, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Duplicate request. 331dot (talk) 07:58, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RohithReddy1234 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Good Evening sir, I am sorry for what the misunderstanding caused.

I didn't do editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

Actually sir, I am an Intern at Project IndicWiki Organized by IIIT Hyderabad, as the part of Project they said to create a Engineering college wiki page. So that's why i have created it.

I didn't do as per my personnel interest sir, previously also I had been blocked for the same reason violating guidelines because at that time I don't the guidelines but I had read them. But this time they given Assignment. So please Unblock me. I will inform them as this is undergoes Violating Wiki guidelines. Please Sir, understand me and help me sir.

I will spread awareness regarding this among my friends and my fellow project interns as they also created like this.

Please sir unblock me sir. RohithReddy1234 (talk) 14:35, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Duplicate request, only one open request is needed at a time. 331dot (talk) 07:23, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RohithReddy1234 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Good Evening sir, I am sorry for what the misunderstanding caused.

I didn't do editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

Actually sir, I am an Intern at Project IndicWiki Organized by IIIT Hyderabad, as the part of Project they said to create a Engineering college wiki page. So that's why i have created it.

I didn't do as per my personnel interest sir, previously also I had been blocked for the same reason violating guidelines because at that time I don't the guidelines but I had read them. But this time they given Assignment. So please Unblock me. I will inform them as this is undergoes Violating Wiki guidelines. Please Sir, understand me and help me sir.

I will spread awareness regarding this among my friends and my fellow project interns as they also created like this.

Please sir unblock me sir. RohithReddy1234 (talk) 16:22, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We aren't concerned with what assignments you have been given; Wikipedia is not here to accommodate your assignments. My suggestion would be that you tell your friends and fellow interns to cease editing Wikipedia until you get unblocked, as they are now at risk of being blocked themselves as sock puppets of you. 331dot (talk) 07:26, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I don't have any interest in advertising or self promoting.

I just created a Engineering college wiki page because of the assignment alloted for us in the Internship. Sorry for causing the inconvenience caused by me. Please unblock me sir.

As I really don't know that, this will violate the wiki guidelines. RohithReddy1234 (talk) 16:27, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You were already warned just over a week ago not to make duplicate unblock requests, yet you now have three simultaneous unblock requests, two of them identical and a third saying basically the same thing. You should pick two of them to delete and then leave the third one at the bottom of your talk page, not in the middle. If you want an administrator to take you seriously when you say you will follow the rules from now on, violating the rules in the actual unblock request is a poor approach. This path of making continual non-constructive requests can only lead to your talk page access being revoked, meaning that you'll have to use WP:UTRS to make unblock requests and won't be able to make public ones. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 07:10, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

email

Thanks for email. You know the procedure for appealing blocks, follow it, I won't unblock you. You won't be unblocked to write about your college, assignment or not. If you keep making appeals without a clear description of what other articles you might cointribute to, it is likely that your talk page access will be revoked Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:17, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The block is no longer necessary because I understand what I am blocked for, I will not do it again, and I will make productive contributions instead.

Sorry sir violating the procedure for appealing blocks.

Actually I am a Project Intern at IndicWiki Project held by IIIT Hyderabad. As I don't want to advertise or self-promote in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

As the part of Project they said to create a Engineering college wiki page. So that's why I have created it. RohithReddy1234 (talk) 15:35, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RohithReddy1234 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am really sorry for violating Wiki Guidelines.

I am asking you to please unblock me.

The block is no longer necessary because I understand what I am blocked for, I will not do it again, and I will make productive contributions instead.

Sorry sir violating the procedure for appealing blocks.

From here on I will never do such kind f things again, I will follow all the guidelines, Not only me I will spread awareness regarding this among my friends and my fellow project interns.

As I am an Project Intern, the Project incharge asked me why I am blocked, then I explained about all the things and the mistake what I have commited.

As this is clearly a mis-understanding about the task given. So that's the mistake happen.

So please kindly Unblock me for this last time.

I am requesting you for this time. I understand what I am blocked for, I will not do it again, and I will make productive contributions instead.

Thanks & Regards

RohithReddy1234 RohithReddy1234 (talk) 06:38, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You need to do more than tell us that you understand, you need to demonstrate your understanding. We aren't concerned about what those supervising you are asking you. 331dot (talk) 07:58, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RohithReddy1234 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to request reconsideration of the indefinite block placed on my account due to concerns about advertising or self-promotion, which were deemed violations of Wikipedia's conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

Firstly, I sincerely apologize for any actions that may have contravened Wikipedia’s guidelines. It was not my intention to misuse the platform or violate its policies. I fully understand the importance of maintaining Wikipedia's standards of neutrality, verifiability, and notability, and I deeply regret any disruptions my contributions may have caused.

Upon reflection, I realize that my edits could have been perceived as promotional. I assure you that this was unintentional and stemmed from a lack of understanding of the specific guidelines related to conflict of interest and notability. I am committed to adhering strictly to Wikipedia's policies moving forward.

To demonstrate my commitment, I have reviewed the relevant guidelines thoroughly and am prepared to contribute constructively. I would be grateful for any specific advice or requirements from the administrators on how I can rectify past mistakes and ensure that my future contributions are in full compliance with Wikipedia's standards.

I would be grateful for any specific advice or requirements from the administrators on how I can rectify past mistakes and ensure that my future contributions are in full compliance with Wikipedia's standards. I am eager to contribute positively to Wikipedia and am open to any further training or mentorship that might be necessary to prevent any recurrence of past issues.

I respectfully request that you consider lifting the block on my account. I am eager to contribute positively to Wikipedia and am open to any further training or mentorship that might be necessary to prevent any recurrence of past issues.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Decline reason:

Your request reads like it was created by AI. You need to be more specific. You should say what topics you want to edit. I am declining your request. PhilKnight (talk) 17:01, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

RohithReddy1234 (talk) 09:32, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]