Jump to content

User talk:Rogerd/Archive006

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Upload on commons

Hi Rogerd, thank you for your suggestions.

But, please accecpt that I have almost anything but time.

If you want to change anything or sorting up images, just do it. If the image is already uploaded under a different name, tell me, i will delete the image asap.

If you want to coordinate the image transfer, please contact me on my german user page, since where were severall hundreds image left.

Best regards -- Stahlkocher 17:20, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for feedback

Thanks for your feedback on my article. As mentioned on the talk page, I'm at a loss for a good first paragraph. Any suggestions or help you can provide would be appreciated. Acdixon 17:55, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

X-series Response

Comment now posted on Template talk:X-planes. BillCJ 03:50, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Thank You!

I even enjoy contacting the families to get more information. That's how I got the middle name of Charles Albert Levine. Once you have it, its easy to confirm with a Google search, but coming up with it is very hard. Tracking down the family is not easy, but fun --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 02:05, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

More thanks

Thanks for cleaning up the personal attack on my user talk page, and on the talk page of the biography article about me. I probably would have left those, if only because I shouldn't be the one to remove them... but they're certainly silly digresssions. I can't quite fathom why the editor put them there; I've gotten similar stuff before, both places, but always with editors I had editing conflicts with on other topics... this one has a short editing history, essentially falling entirely during the last few weeks when I've been far too busy to actively edit Wikipedia on any topic. LotLE×talk 14:08, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

132.241.246.111

Could you look at this diff please? (I've also asked Admin:Luna Santin to look at it.) —12.72.72.229 16:22, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

My time is a little short today. If Luna Santin can't get to it, perhaps you can get another admin to, or I can perhaps get to it on Monday or Tuesday. --rogerd 18:31, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
Admin:Luna Santin says that he'll look into it. —12.72.72.229 18:40, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Congressman Dan Burton

I needed some help on the Dan Burton page. According to his congressional biography and Indiana Ballot his proper name is Danny Burton. I find no evidence that his name is Daniel. He was actually born Danny Lee Burton from all sources. I am pretty new on wikipedia. Am I editing the page wrong or am I not following the proper channels? Thanks for any help Harmon1630

Tomb Sentinels

Noted. Thanks for the clarification.
--Baylink 15:44, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Memorial Coliseum (Lexington)

I didn't realize the women still played there. I notice there are a few more arenas in the Category where the women still play at the old arena. I'll make those changes. Thanks! Patken4 21:01, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue VIII - October 2006

The October 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 22:28, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

November Esperanza Newsletter

Program Feature: Admin Coaching (needs coaches!)
Admin Coaching needs coaches!!! If you are an administrator, or even a generally experienced user, do consider signing up to be a coach.

Admin Coaching, now being coordinated by HighwayCello, is a program for people who want help learning some of the more subtle aspects of Wikipedia policy and culture. People are matched with experienced users who are willing to offer coaching. The program is designed for people who have figured out the basics of editing articles; they're not newcomers any more, but they might want some help in learning new roles. In this way, Esperanza would help keep hope alive for Wikipedia because we would always be grooming the next generation of admins.

What's New?
The Tutorial Drive is a new Esperanza program! In an effort to make complicated processes on Wikipedia easier for everyone, Esperanza working to create and compile a list of tutorials about processes here on Wikipedia. Consider writing one!
A discussion on how Esperanza relates to the encyclopedia has been started; please add your thoughts.
Many thanks to MiszaBot, courtesy of Misza13, for delivering the newsletter.
  • The list of proposed programs has been updated, with some proposals being archived.
  • There is now a new program: the Tutorial Drive! Consider writing a tutorial on something you are good at doing on Wikipedia.
  • The suggestion of adding a cohesive look to all the Esperanza pages is being considered; join the discussion if you are interested!
  • In order to make a useful interlanguage welcome template, those involved in translation projects will be asked what English Wikipedia policies are most important and confusing to editors coming from other language Wikipedias.
  • A discussion of Esperanza's role in Wikipedia is being held, with all thoughts of all Esperanzians wanted!
  • Shreshth91 informed everyone that he will be leaving the Esperanza council as life is rather busy; his spot will be filled by the runner up from the last election, HighwayCello.
Signed...
Although having the newsletter appear on everyone's userpage is desired, this may not be ideal for everyone. If, in the future, you wish to receive a link to the newsletter, rather than the newsletter itself, you may add yourself to Wikipedia:Esperanza/Newsletter/Opt Out List.

B-24

on wikipedia page:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B-24_Liberator#Specifications_.28B-24J.29

The cruising speed o the B-24J is listed as 215 mph. Rlboone1917 19:59, 10 November 2006 (UTC)Although this is true it is a reference to the true air speed rather than the airspeed indicator.

I realize that on another page the difference of altitude and outside temperature explains this, but it is my opinion that it should be made clear on the above page that this aircraft generally cruised at 150-160 mph by airspeed indicator. Not to do so is, I believe,is a method of “spinning” the facts.

Most people will not know the difference or be able to find it and will think that WOW, this aircraft was fast..

The B-24 may not have been as pretty, or as easy to fly as the B-17, but it was a fine plane for our Operation Carpetbagger

Rlboone1917 19:59, 10 November 2006 (UTC)Rlboone1917

WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter, Issue 7, November 2006

WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter
Issue 007 – November 2006

Issue of the Month

Again, the issue of the month is inline citations. A Day in the Life, A Hard Day's Night (song), and Get Back have all been defeatured, as they failed to satisfy criterion 1(c) of What is a featured article?, and other song FAs are due for the chopping block. Inline citations are an important aspect of articles—they ensure verifiability and reliability, and they remove original research. Additionally, they give readers the option to read the original source material and view it within context.

Basically:

  1. All direct quotations attributed to Beatles members pooled from interviews need full inline citations.
  2. All critical comments about songs or albums need full inline citations to notable music critics, magazines opinions, or reviews, as opposed to being merely comments by Wikipedians.
  3. Inline citations need: author name, article name, publication date, and name of publication. Such info is still preferable even if quoting from an interview posted upon a website; when this is the case, place the URL link at the end of the citation with the date it was last accessed. (This will help editors retrieve the page using the Wayback Machine, should the link go dead in the future.)
Beatles News
  • The Beatles are due to release a soundtrack album, LOVE, at the end of November, as a companion to their Cirque du Soleil adaptation of the same name. It will feature remastered and remixed versions of their previously released songs, including some new medleys.
  • Paul's getting a divorce. Pain, arguing, and fighting abound.
Project News
  • The Wings tours are really nicely documented now (see Category:Wings tours), but Category:The Beatles tours is almost empty. Kingboyk and the rest of us would love to see (and read) articles on each Beatles tour, including the pre-fame tours of the UK—and the Hamburg trips, of course!
  • The hottest Project page this month has been Paul McCartney, involved in the Featured Article drive, as mentioned above.
Member News
  • Our project members are too modest to report any awards they may have given or received.
From the Editors

Wherever possible, editors should help to trim down on list-like prose within Beatles articles. They should convert list-like sections into fluent, cohesive prose which ties an article's sections together. Lists make articles disjointed, awkward, and difficult to read.

Be sure to take part in the Featured Article drive, and don't forget those inline citations!

If you've just joined, add your name to the Participants section of Wikipedia:WikiProject The Beatles. You'll get a mention in the next issue of the Newsletter and get it delivered as desired. Also, please include your own promotions and awards in future issues. Don't be shy!

Lastly, this is your newsletter and you can be involved in the creation of the next issue (Issue 008 – December 2006). Any and all contributions are welcome. Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned, or just start editing!

Contributors to this Issue
Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.

Maker's Mark

I made those edits because whisky/whiskey was used inconsistently throughout the article. I figured, given that "whiskey" is the more common American spelling, and we are dealing with an American liquor, whiskey would be more appropriate to switch the whiskys to whiskey. Nevertheless, all references to should probably be changed to "bourbon" as it is the variety at issue in the article. "Country" Bushrod Washington 04:39, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue IX - November 2006

The November 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 23:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Withdrawn

I appreciate your support, but have decided to withdraw from consideration for a position as an arbitrator. The community has overwhelming found me to be too controversial to hold that position. Thanks again for your support.--MONGO 19:57, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter Issue 8, December 2006

WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter
Issue 008 – December 2006

Issue of the Month

Wikipedia's standards are improving all the time, with the result that many articles in The Beatles Wikiproject are being nominated for review of their FA and GA status - and many are losing that accolade. It is difficult, with such a large number of articles and the ease with which editors may make changes which are detrimental, to maintain the standard of articles, let alone improve them. As ever, members efforts are both appreciated and needed to keep the Project on course.

Beatles News
  • A Beatles compilation called "Love", featuring tracks remastered by George Martin (with his son Giles), has been released and has made number 1 in Canada.
  • The impending divorce between Paul McCartney and the former Heather Mills continues to make the pages in the tabloid press in the UK.
Project News
  • The hottest Project page this month has been Paul McCartney (see above and below).
Member News
From the Editors

If one is to be mercenary about the subject, it should be noted that Paul McCartney is going to be more noteworthy than usual in the near future as his divorce case comes to court. In that case it is great to note that a small group of Project Members (plus another individual who does not feel compelled to register himself despite important contributions) have worked very hard, and in an atmosphere of good humour, to take the McCartney piece to a succesful Good Article nomination. Perhaps this is the method to use for future articles, a small dedicated team concentrating on one subject at a time. Of course, all members are invited to join any existing group or even go about forming their own. Please note any such action in the Project Log.

If you've just joined, add your name to the Participants section of Wikipedia:WikiProject The Beatles. You'll get a mention in the next issue of the Newsletter and get it delivered as desired. Also, please include your own promotions and awards in future issues. Don't be shy!

Lastly, this is your newsletter and you can be involved in the creation of the next issue (Issue 009 – January 2007). Any and all contributions are welcome. Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned, or just start editing!

Contributors to this Issue
Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.

ArbCom election

Yeah, I'm hoping that if a large number of the candidates come out against this decision, the ArbCom might rethink. User:Zoe|(talk) 03:22, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!

Hi Roger

Thanks for the warm welcome. I look forward to contributing further in the future.

Best,

YossarianC22 23:22, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

help request: infobox television revision

Hi . I am having a doozy of a time entering theme music composer to the television infobox. I tried to add it on the syntax section of template:infobox television and my edit did not result in the addition of theme music composer. Any tips? Thanks. Dogru144 14:25, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Enola Gay

Hi Rogerd! Oh please, please stop reverting the Enola Gay song entry. It isn't a supposed hit single but a genuine one. Quoting from Wikipedia: "a single is usually considered to be a hit when it has reached the top forty position in Billboard Magazine’s Hot 100 or the UK Singles Chart". This OMD song reached number 8 in the UK Singles Chart. It's still receives some airtime and is popular in clubs throughout Europe. I know that the bomber is considerably more popular but at least let Wikipedia acknowledge the existence of the song. Thanks! Lathrop1885 12:32, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
Thanks for the support! MONGO 09:43, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

re: Peter Roskam

I suppose that my edit summary should be more descriptive. However, if you review the article history and talk page, you will see that an indefinitely blocked user, User:Joehazelton, has been making the same edit as the one whch I reverted on an almost daily basis for months. He now uses an anonymized IP address to avoid the block. When the artiocle is soft-protected, he creates a user ID in order to make the same edits to the article. In my view, the editor that I reverted is clearly Joehazelton avoiding his block. — goethean ॐ 15:38, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

Change to Common.css

Per recent discussions, the way in which Persondata is viewed by Wikipedia editors has changed. In order to continue viewing Persondata in Wikipedia articles, please edit your user CSS file to display table.persondata rather than table.metadata. More specific instructions can be found on the Persondata page. --ShakingSpirittalk on behalf of Kaldari 01:48, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

Cooperative Research timeline at 911 attacks article

Please assent or dissent to mediation in the 911 external timeline link matter. [1] Thanks.

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue X - December 2006

The December 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 23:19, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

{{blatantvandal}} on User talk:Astanhope

Hey, I'm not condoning Astanhope adding unsourced information to the article, but I really think the blatantvandal template is a bit of an overreaction. Astanhope really does seem to be trying to contribute productively to Gerald Ford and that type of warning never really does much. I just figured I'd say. alphachimp. 06:51, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

ok, so I checked again and it looks like he was only adding that information. That said, I still think it might have been a bit of an overreaction. Just saying. Keep up the good work. alphachimp. 06:53, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
hmm. I didn't consider that it had anything to do with the image vandalism. I think he started adding the information a little before the shock images (I started seeing them around 0115 EST). Anyway, it really doesn't seem important enough to have an argument about it. I understand your reasoning. I just figured I'd register my disagreement with using one of our strongest warnings. Have a great night, alphachimp. 07:06, 27 December 2006 (UTC)


Charles Durning

First of all, I reverted your edits to Charles Durning ([2]), as that information is certanally verifiable, if you have any information controdicting my theory, please put it onto my talk page. Thanks, and happy editing! Kaspazes talk

I have done a considerable amount of reasearch research on him, and it seems to me that all of that information is certainly verifiable. The World Book Encyclopedia states the same thing, and the article paraphrases it. Unless you can show any evidence against what is stated on the page, the edit will stand. Thanks! Kaspazes talk 12:47, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
I have proctured my evidence, look up Durning, Charles in the World Book Encyclopedia and a full doctrine is availible. Hence, the edit stands, as the Encyclopedia is certainly a verifiable source. Also, consider using the {{subst:SpellCheck}} template. Kaspazes talk 14:44, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Gerald Ford: Athletics

Nearly 90% of that section is devoted to Ford's history in football, both in high school and college, with some mention of boxing. If you summed the section up in one sentence, it would be Ford was especially gifted in sports, particullary football. That's why it is titles Athletics. College was too vague, and anyway it was titled Football by me before you changed it. So, Athletics is a compromise between the two.

Concerning your info on Yellowstone, it has no bearing in that section. How do you go from talking about Ford playing football to a tidbit on him at Yellowstone? That's more of a "did you know" bit of info, which isn't encyclopedic. If there was a section of Ford's outside interests, other than sports, it might fit. But remember, this article already gained "featured status". So any additional sections would more than likely be unneccessary. Veracious Rey talk↔contribs 21:09, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

I didn't mean to imply you can't add ever add a new section to a FA article. But the yellowstone info didn't fit where it was, and I didn't see anyother area for a good placement. I'm not sure if you're being sarcastic about the freemasonry section, but I'll take a look at it and see how it reads.


Photograph of B-36

Contrary to what you may think, the photograph provided by the United States Air Force is a better and higher quality photograph than the one that you took yourself. I won't stop you from trying to add it back but please consider that your camera and photograph is inferior to the one provided by the USAF. --Signaleer 18:13, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Please read the section that I posted above, this discussion is moot. --Signaleer 19:01, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

The minor edit duel that you and Signaleer have going on in Convair B-36 should have been resolved by the consensus on the talk page. Instead of continually reverting eachother, I would suggest trying to resolve your dispute --Patrick Berry 20:16, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Roger, don't worry about it. Signaleer has shown that he does not want to engage in useful discussion, or in this case, even useful editing. I will quit bothering you guys about it and simply revert his changes if needed. Patrick Berry 15:31, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Chandler_Ben.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Chandler_Ben.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:36, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Images

Rogerd, I sent you several emails. I can't say which image is better for the B-36 article, but maybe it is a waste of time to edit war over it with him. Maybe post both images on the talk page, do a side by side and have folks "vote" on it. But him telling you your camera is "inferior" is wrong....the data info indicates otherwise.--MONGO 19:18, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

I agree, I am in the process of posting a message on the talk:Convair B-36. I responded to your e-mail, did you get my response?--rogerd 19:24, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
responded via email.--MONGO 20:16, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Jay Mariotti

how is it considered vandalism if its true? jay marriotti really had a angioplastygo to his mocking webbsite and even they he had one recently dont tell we its vandilism when its not. i demand you erase my warning immediately User:Brent schneider 22:34 january 8th 2007 http://www.jaythejoke.com/index.php/site/in_which_we_wish_jay_well/

Your addition the the article was poorly spelled, not referenced, had bad grammar and was placed in an inappropriate section of the article. --rogerd 04:58, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
You "demand you erase my warning immediately", yet you do this? --rogerd 00:27, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

uh the edit before mine was yours correcting my edit of a question mark after the comment is he a douche? if you wanted to remove it you could have but you didn't. all i did was remove it from hypocrite and made it its own section. 16:04 10 january 2007 brentschneider


Hi Rogerd. I noticed that you had helped with the Jay Mariotti article and I was wondering if you could take a moment and look at the Skip Bayless article. I don't know what to do, or even if what I am doing is the right thing, but there are some who continue to add criticism that I'm not sure should be allowed. Chickenmonkey 23:36, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Lindsey Graham

Don't you see the resemblance to David Duke? -EJ220 04:44, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

No, and even if I did, it wouldn't be encyclopedic. --rogerd 11:39, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter, Issue 9, January 2007

WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter
Issue 009 – January 2007

Beatles News
  • The ongoing divorce proceedings between Paul McCartney and the former Heather Mills continues to occupy the attention of the media - Heather Mills reportedly receiving unspecified death threats.
  • The British Post Office have released a series of stamps depicting various Beatles album covers.
Project News
  • The Paul McCartney article is being primped and primed for submission as a Featured Article candidate.
  • The good folk who have been working on the above article have turned their attention to the John Lennon page. Everyone is, of course, invited to contribute.
  • The hottest Project page this month has been the Macca (Paul for those not in the know!) article, again.
  • Other Project news... Please let the editors know if anything is happening, or just contribute it to the next newsletter.
Member News
Issue of the Month

The question of capitalising of the letter "t" in The of The Beatles has been raised again. It appears that UK style references (here and here) also maintains that the letter should be in lower case. If the Project is to be appear professional then it may have to change the format. Polite discussion is invited at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject The Beatles/Policy. If possible, please provide sources/references to support your position.

From the Editors

It has been a fairly quiet time with regard to the Project (or at least that is how it seems). If you are reading this and wondering why your efforts in respect of a Beatles article has not been mentioned, it may be that you haven't told any editor. This is your Newsletter, which means you can contribute to it, so please do!

If you've just joined, add your name to the Participants section of Wikipedia:WikiProject The Beatles. You'll get a mention in the next issue of the Newsletter and get it delivered as desired. Also, please include your own promotions and awards in future issues. Don't be shy!

Lastly, this is your newsletter and you can be involved in the creation of the next issue (Issue 010 – January/February 2007). Any and all contributions are welcome. Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned, or just start editing!

Contributors to this Issue
Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.

Cleanup: US Junior Chamber

Thank you for the detailed work you did on this article; I had worried about it turning into an ad and a copylift from the National website. When I stumbled on the article, it contained very little. At that, I initiated the presence of the Creed, and started the Honors listing (using intentional brevity, so that someone else could expound as appropriate). I still wonder if a list of presidents should better be in a separate article. The icing on the cake for me personally is that three days ago my Region presented me with a Senatorship, so it does have me a bit more interested in what belongs there (and my Jaycee career started too recently to appreciate the admission of women, for example). On top of that, I'm interested in doing a userbox for Jaycees, Jaycee Graduates (Roosters), and Senators, but the first thing is to do it within copyrights. For what it's worth, the article about the JCI Senate has gone through a similar re-working by what may be the most appropriate person: the US JCI Senate webmaster. Fwgoebel 05:18, 17 January 2007 (UTC) (Senator #67012)

Convair B-36

If he is going to keep reverting or as he has put it "edit war"[3], then best to ask a neutral party protect the page. I sent you an email...and wish you the best luck tomorrow. Keep me posted.--MONGO 03:20, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XI - January 2007

The January 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 21:23, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Roger Penske article

Hello Rogerd

Roger Penske did in fact drove formula 1 car in US grand prix in 1961 and 1962. Even in the article is writen ´Interestingly enough, although Penske competed in two Formula One Grand Prix, and won a NASCAR Pacific Coast Late Model race at Riverside in 1963, he never ran the Indy 500.´ You can also look in Formula one drivers list article. And if you don't believe this, then look on these websites.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Formula_One_drivers http://www.f1db.com/f1/page/Roger_Penske http://www.oldracingcars.com/bydriver/watn.asp?letter=P http://www.formula1.com/archive/grandprix/1961/661.html http://www.formula1.com/archive/grandprix/1962/632.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1961_United_States_Grand_Prix http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1962_United_States_Grand_Prix —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Treki (talk • contribs) 13:01, 24 January 2007 (UTC).

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Rogerd/Archive006&oldid=1143271878"