User talk:RogerAcr

Welcome!

Hello, RogerAcr! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Jim1138 (talk) 01:50, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

January 2017

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Stevenage, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 10:35, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Jim1138: Hi Jim1138 - I was trying to add some info to that page, then tried to create a separate page which could be accessed via a link. However, it seems very difficult and the process is user-unfriendly to do this. I have now created the linked page and trying to enter reference sources but I am failing to understand the tech-talk in the instruction pages which don't make it clear how to do this. Pity there isn't a layman's guide to editing and creating Wiki pages. Thanks RogerAcr (talk) 17:44, 24 January 2017 (UTC)RogerAcr[reply]

Hi Roger. It looks like you figured it out quite well! I just saw your message. If this helps, see help:referencing for beginners and help:footnotes. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 01:50, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Jim1138:Many thanks, jim1138 ! I think it's one of those things that the more you play with it and use it, the 'easier' it becomes. The Visual Edit though makes it much more straightforward. Many thanks for your help and being available RogerAcr (talk) 09:57, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It becomes easier, that is, if you survive the gauntlet! Jim1138 (talk) 10:13, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Acraman (January 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Would still need all additional major independent news and reviews.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:James Acraman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 23:55, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

RogerAcr, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi RogerAcr! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Doctree (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:James Acraman has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:James Acraman. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 15:30, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Acraman (March 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

While he is a champion, it is of a relatively obscure sport. Additionally, while there is a fair amount of coverage, roughly half are simply stats listings and the other half are local sources. The main issue with local sources is that they don't really demonstrate notability - a slow news day could mean an editor looks at the local church bulletin to find out who has done what that's mildly interesting to put on the 6pm news (I know that's a bit of an extreme example, but hopefully you see my point). Basically, the page needs a few more non-local, independent reliable sources that talk about Acraman in detail.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:James Acraman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 22:06, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:James Acraman concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:James Acraman, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 21:03, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:James Acraman

Hello, RogerAcr. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "James Acraman".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. G13 account of Linguist111 (talk) 17:16, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]