Jump to content

User talk:Rodw/Archive 5

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6Archive 7Archive 10

Mendip way

Rod, if you have a moment, will you take a look at User:Derek Andrews/mendipway and tell me if I am on the right track here. I don't want to do this for the whole route and then have objections regarding original research or insufficient citations. My argument is that it is citing the OS maps, making a written description from their visual description. I plan on walking as much of the route soon to add more photographs. Derek Andrews (talk) 12:04, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply Rod. The link to South West Coast Path was what I really needed. I have looked at lots of path pages and not found any with significant content, so I will use that and Leeds Country Way as good examples to follow. As for grid refs, I was only going to add those for the two ends of the trail, and I think they would be better placed in the infobox. I don't know how of the trail I will get done. It will probably be sections that I can get to by bus. I just hope the weather is good:) Derek Andrews (talk) 14:11, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Assessment

Sure. It is still only the basics though. But i'll see what i can do. Simply south (talk) 21:32, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Okay, i've created an assessment department but it will have to be adapted from there. Its a start though. (And i borrowed some stuff from the Somerset project) Simply south (talk) 23:51, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Why?

Hi Rod!

Quick one - why was my Cheddar edit deemed inappropriate?

Cheers —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.153.34.13 (talk) 20:48, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Ah, fair enough.

Hi Rod!

Then I shall do a Wikipedia page on who the Terrys are and the significance it has for the town, then re do it.

Cheers —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.153.34.13 (talk) 21:00, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Combwich

That is just a tag at the bottom of the page. Click on the Enter button, it is only a new site but it is growing as more people from the village are starting to submit information and pictures for it.

It is linked to from the Cannington website as well as many other local ones like the local pub and boat club. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tonicblue (talkcontribs) 11:31, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

I am confused. When I click on that I see this page (That is another link to it using the my sub domain instead of the main domain) I am in the process of changing the Name Server to park to domain on my web host but I didn't think that had come into effect yet. I will make sure that my Host is handling the new domain properly. Sorry about the confusion. --Tonicblue (talk) 15:14, 25 March 2008 (UTC)


for all your help with the Museums Project

Your rating system

You have rated Kedleston Hall & Little Moreton Hall as "start class." witjout transforming them onto FAs what do you feel needs to be added? Giano (talk) 13:41, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

PS: Ascott House as well. Giano (talk) 13:43, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

I've given you rollback...

... just because. You seem to be in good standing, so have fun with it. Justin(Gmail?)(u) 17:01, 2 April 2008 (UTC)


Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in ...

I saw your name at Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Photographers. I revised the pages at Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in England. Please consider adding your name to the top of the page at Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in Somerset and to any of the other subpages for Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in England. Thanks. GregManninLB (talk) 01:53, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

I used "The" in the title to distinguish this museum from the Hammer Museum. I suppose it could be changed to Hammer Museum (Haines, AK). What do you think?Mycota (talk) 00:00, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Museums in Cheshire

(copied from response on WP:CHES's talk page.) I've added a load (yesterday) and tried to put in either websites or contact details for them, too, to reassure people that they are real (like the "Cuckoo Clock Museum", for instance). May be there are more, or there are some which could be added but which I thought were outside the remit of the project? What kinds of places which one might not immediately think of as museums would be included?  DDStretch  (talk) 11:14, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Alterations to The Castle School

Hi Rodw, I had to edit a page of Wikipedia for a course I am studying, and provide reasons for doing so, and proof that I had done it, plus critisism on the edit from an interested party. I found a couple or errors and omissions, which I have corrected. If you would like to comment anonymously, I could use that as my feedback. I'm certainly not going to start an edit war! :-)

Regards, Nethobo —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nethobo (talkcontribs) 14:46, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

The Castle School - alterations

Hi Rodw, Thanks for the feedback, it was very useful to a first time editor. I didn't use the term CDT, or write about the all weather pich, they were already in place, but I understand your comments. Thanks for pointing ouy the protocols, I must admit I'm on a tight schedule, and didn't read all the help pages. I chose this page to edit because I work there and my children attended the school. The course I am doing is an Open University module on Systems Thinking (T214). Regards, Nethobo —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nethobo (talkcontribs) 16:08, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Palazzo Pitti

Rod! I know I only come here to moan, one day I will come grinning like a Cheshire cat...but how can the Palazzo Pitti be a museum of only mid importance [1]. It contains some of the greatest paintings of the world, hundreds of rooms packed with artefacts and art of the greatst importance. Not to mention the gallery of modern art, where I intend to gave my ashes scattered (when no-one is looking). The collections of the Medici are there, the greatest collectors of art the world has ever known. After the Uffizi it is Florence's greatest gallery, in my view, for the less intelectual tourist it is better than the Uffizi because the items are in the habitat and setting for which they were intended. The Palazzo contains not one single ugly object. It is one of the world's premier museums. Giano (talk) 18:24, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Hey, Rod, I'm coming to this completely out of left field... being a botany/medical writer by training ... but I would have to agree with Giano above. Everyone from everywhere goes to the "Pitti Palace" when in Florence. It's a must-see, truly a world-class attraction.Celia Kozlowski (talk) 23:20, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Quantock Hills

Hi Rod, Thanks for the note about your schedule. I hope to finish the review today unless a real-life event prevents it. I'm doing a few light edits as I go, partly to be helpful and partly because it's often easier to make a change than to write an explanation. Finetooth (talk) 15:31, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Done and on hold. Given your schedule, the seven days is really more like five days. If this proves to be too much of a crunch, let me know, and we'll work out something else. Finetooth (talk) 01:51, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Somerset Tower

I couldn't decide between Somerset Tower vs. Somerset Towers... but I have pushed this towering inferno? out there into wikispace. I took your suggestion and just went with the Poyntz Wright scheme, but added weasel language and put in italics all the dates and categorization from him... It may not be wiki style, but it does let people know what came from him and that they should be on their guard. Can you check to be sure I didn't italicize dates that you may have got from elsewhere? I did change the description of Langport All Saints -- it said it has an octagonal tower, but I've been there.. and as the picture shows, the tower is quite square. The turret does look a bit octagonal, so I said square tower (with octagonal turret). I wonder if maybe that got confused with Somerton -- it does have a famous octagonal tower (as does N. Curry) but I didn't go into any of those in this article... which is probably too long already!

Is there a special Wiki for architecture? It would be good to have someone who actually knows something about the subject have a look...

Also ... I'm so hopeless with reference formatting.... Could you fix West Monkton and Thurlbear so the references number properly?

in any case, thanks for all your help, as always,Celia Kozlowski (talk) 23:16, 10 April 2008 (UTC)


Oh! I found the architecture wiki project and posted a note on their talk page asking them to have a look. Maybe I'll also have my friend Jim and my sister look in, too. cheers!Celia Kozlowski (talk) 23:38, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

More Castle School

Hi Rod, I made another brief edit. I changed 'CDT rooms' to 'Craft Design and Technology department' as you suggested, and added Art Department to bring it up to date. Hope this is ok. If I can get hold of some images next term, I will be in touch for advice on how to add them. Hope it looks ok. Nethobo —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nethobo (talkcontribs) 12:37, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Help on referencing content

Thanks for the welcome - its like being a new kid at school. I am responsible for Flat Holm Island and have set the team the challenge of getting to featured article status. We have a wealth of information on every aspect of Flat Holm and the Wardens have now got a broadband link so it will help pass the lonely hours between school visits. My question is how should we reference facts which come from our own leaflets and reports etc? I've looked at the guidance and various examples but still not sure. Also any advice on the long haul to the prized star staus would be much appreciated

Thanks in anticipation

Tony (talk) 15:54, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Sandbox testing?

Hi Rod thanks for the tips - it seems a good idea to work out things in my sandbox until I've got the style right - but I'm not sure if I've set up the test area correctly so if you have time please will you look at this Sandbox and let me know if I'm doing it right? Thanks Tony (talk) 11:57, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Halsway Manor

I have nominated Halsway Manor, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Halsway Manor. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Kironide (talk) 02:04, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Enjoy the holidays

sorry I didn't get to the peer review for the Bristol article. Will do ASAP TRAVELLINGCARIMy storyTell me yours 11:44, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

How far to go with Flat Holm

Hi Rod the Flat Holm page is coming along well thanks for your help. I'm not sure how much to add can you suggest a good benchmark article please? Tony (talk) 19:49, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

DYK

Updated DYK query On 16 April, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Somerset Towers, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Cirt (talk) 12:38, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Flat Holm

Hi. I've made a few tweaks. Looks like it should reach GA status easily. SP-KP (talk) 14:42, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Mary Seacole

All done. Rudget (Help?) 13:15, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Hakluyt's memorial tablet in Bristol Cathedral

Hi, Rod. Bristol Cathedral helpfully e-mailed two images to me – one of the memorial tablet, and the other of a wonderful stained-glass image of Hakluyt. I've uploaded these to the Wikimedia Commons: see "Category:Richard Hakluyt". However, if you would like to take more photographs and add them to the category, please feel free to do so. And thanks again for volunteering! — Cheers, JackLee talk 23:11, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Page protections

It's preemptive anti-Grawp protection -- he seems to like moving featured geography articles. I'm going to put a note on my talk page saying that I'm willing to move any article I've move-protected if the move has been discussed and there is consensus for it. I really can't think of a good reason to move a featured article without any discussion. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:39, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

While I put the template on, intending to review it, I notice somebody else had already put the template on the article talkpage before me, so he or she gets precedence.. --Relata refero (disp.) 12:31, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

My feeling is that the article is likely to fail GA unless the issue about "A lot more expansion of the history section, please. It is outweighed by the organ section" is addressed. I can help with the copyediting, but I can't help with the history aspect. As it happens, I agree with the reviewer; almost half of the article is about the organ, not the abbey. --Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 23:10, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Avonfirebadge.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Avonfirebadge.gif. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 13:25, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

solsbury hill

the images with the relevant information for the references/ citations are available on the solsbury hill, if you just look on the history and go back you will see the images. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.157.251.230 (talk) 17:39, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

use the discussion pages

instead of sending me new messages try using the discussion page —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.157.251.230 (talk) 21:47, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Bathchronicle.jpg}

Thank you for uploading Image:Bathchronicle.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:24, 21 May 2008 (UTC)


Fair use rationale for Image:Bristolobserver.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bristolobserver.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:56, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

WP: Devon

Thanks so much for taking interest! After I've done all the categories I'm going to start marking all the unassessed article to the correct assessment (a lot of them should already have their assessment on their talk page). You can do the same with importance as well as their class. If you want to help me out with this you can start from the end of the list and go backwards and I'll start from the front and work my way back. Only if you want to of course! Meaty♠Weenies (talk) 19:47, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! Meaty♠Weenies (talk) 20:53, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Do you know how you can get one of these pages for the Devon (or Somerset) Wikiproject? Meaty♠Weenies (talk) 21:27, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

I appears as though User:WP 1.0 bot has just done this for me. Thanks anyway! Meaty♠Weenies (talk) 00:48, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Somerset Towers -- Good Enough?

Hi, Rod -- all sorts of family issues have kept me out of the wikiworld of late. I put in the pevsner citations for two picture caption quotes and changed the Huish Episcopi caption, with another reference... But I'm not very good at references so we now have two additional Pevsner reference appearing at the end... and I see if I'd known how to do it, I could have piggy backed on another reference already there on the Huish Episcopi tower being on the 1972 9-p stamp... I'm hopeless. I also don't know whether the article is good enough to be nominated as a Good Article.... but feel free to run it up that flagpole and see if anyone salutes... a good yankee expression for "give it a shot" I guess... chrs et bestCelia Kozlowski (talk) 21:42, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

DYK

Updated DYK query On 6 June, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article John Billingsley (agriculturist), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Daniel Case (talk) 04:09, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Shortening Somerset Towers

Hiya, Rod, IMHO... Better than taking out quotes or pix, I'll suggest on the talk page for Somerset Towers that we cut it just before the beginning of all the Generations... and move that to a secondary page e.g. A Tour of Somerset Towers or some such. cheers,Celia Kozlowski (talk) 21:29, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Improving Somerset Towers Images

Hi there Rod, incase you havn't seen my reply over in the graphics labs, i have begun improving several of the images, fixing perspective, colour-correction and channels etc and will continue to work on the others. Im finding this a rather intriging project, nice to see so many different examples of architecture and im enojying working on it. Is there any specifically that you would like to be paid attention to? As for deciding which are best I really can't say at this stage there are so many to choose from ;) thanks Tango22 (talk) 23:32, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Places in Somerset

Hi, You've added several red links to List of places in Somerset which, as a far as I can find out, are tiny hamlets &, in one case, a single farm, which I don't think meet the notability criteria for their own articles. Therefore I've been doing redirects to the civil parish they are in - hope this is OK? if not please revert & start the relevant stubs (& I don't think they will ever be more than stubs).— Rod talk 11:46, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Absolutely OK with me. It's not just Somerset I add them to; it's for consistency with the lists of UK places and when I create disambigs there I try to remember to update the appropriate county list as well. Best Wishes Saga City (talk) 09:35, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Illegally placing copyrighted content onto Wikipedia

On several occasions, such as this one: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mendip_Hills&diff=100966700&oldid=100951410 you have illegally copied copyrighted content from other sites (including my own UK caves database site) and put that content into Wikipedia. I have now removed my copyrighted content from here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caves_of_the_Mendip_Hills However, I am now wondering how many other places you have added my content to this site.

You must now go over the pages you have edited on this site, and remove any and all of the content from my site that you have copied here, and the same for any illegally copied content of other sites.

For your information, Wikipedia's license reads: "To this end, the text contained in Wikipedia is copyrighted (automatically, under the Berne Convention) by Wikipedia contributors and licensed to the public under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL)." that means you must not copy any information to this site unless it is already licensed with a compatible license. Most content, my own included, is not compatible with this license.

Further, it says: "If you contribute material to Wikipedia, you thereby license it to the public under the GFDL (with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts). In order to contribute, you must be in a position to grant this license, which means that either you hold the copyright to the material, for instance because you produced it yourself, or you acquired the material from a source that allows the licensing under GFDL, for instance because the material is in the public domain or is itself published under GFDL." I am the copyright holder for the content you have been copying, and I did not under any circumstances give my permission for you to license my material in this way.

Read the Wikipedia:Copyrights page before copying any more information to Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Copyrights 82.13.95.125 (talk) 11:52, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the speedy resolution to this. (Logged in this time - IP address was not static for long but got your reply.)TarquinWJ (talk) 14:24, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your clean-up of the citations on Cleeve Abbey. I must admit I've been doing the cites the way I was taught to do them at university (which is now a very long time ago), but if the style you've used is the recommended Wiki style I'll do them that way from now on - cheers for the heads-up. So far I've mostly been doing Cistercian and Hampshire monasteries, as there are so many that need work and one has to start somewhere - but I'll happily have a look at some of the Somerset ones too. I see Glastonbury Abbey, for instance, needs a complete re-doing. Soph (talk) 21:20, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Hi Rod! As Exmoor will shortly be on the main page as Today's Featured Article, I am going to do a spoken version of it. I have had a quick look through it for difficult or strange pronunciations, and the only one I'm a bit concerned about is Simonsbath. Do you happen to know if it is pronounced intuitively with a long "i", or if is pronounced "Simmons-bath"? I know there's somewhere in Britain which is called "Simon"-something but is pronounced with a short "i", but I can't remember if it's Simonsbath or somewhere else...! Thanks, Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 12:03, 18 July 2008 (UTC)