User talk:Rodneye9110

Welcome!

Hello, Rodneye9110, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Feedthepope (talk) 20:04, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Morgellons edits

Hi, I see you are new at WP, so welcome. Your best bet is to discuss big changes or content additions like you have tried to make there at the talk page of the article. I am going to drop the standard warning here, don't get alarmed, it just explains the policies etc. Happy editing.

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Dbrodbeck (talk) 12:47, 5 July 2013 (UTC) okay, I went to the talk thingy and stated my case. I got a list of 50 citations I would like to add since only one or two of them seem to be included.Rodneye9110 (talk) 14:03, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Rodneye9110 reported by User:Dawn Bard (Result: ). Thank you. Dawn Bard (talk) 14:55, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Morgellons. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 21:50, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rodneye9110 (talk) 01:23, 10 July 2013 (UTC) Unblock; This is my only account. I am not a sockpuppet as has been accused. I am simply someone diagnosed and receiving treatment for a version of Lyme disease called Morgellons. Mainstream doctors with mainstream medicine. When I asked in a dispute resolution for information regarding a CDC study on Morgellons (page 9 of the study states that 83% of the fibers found were protein) I argued that this information should be included under the CDC study information. I was then accused of being a sockpuppet and blocked indefinitely. I don't know this user they accuse me of being a puppet to. Denial is not a river in Africa! Keep living with your heads in the sand. I will spread the word that wikipedia is flawed because only serlect people are allowed to say what is truth.[reply]

My treatment has been multiple rounds of keflex and most recently doxycycline multiple times. As stated earlier I have two out of the five markers for Lyme Disease under the Western Blot test which proves exposure to the Lyme Disease. My mind is affected but not so much to not recognize a cover-up in progress. Go ahead, pick and choose your editors and your sources. In the end the truth will come out and so will your foolishness. Popular Mechanics, CNN, Washington Post are amongst your scientific cited sources. That speaks for itself. Puff yourselves up and feel proud because that bubble is about to pop.

Accusation of multiple accounts

<attacking commentary removed> I'm going to give you one chance and one chance only. I've removed your personal attacks here. If you wish to post an unblock request, follow the instructions in the block notice, which I've reinstated. Please read WP:GAB first--your unblock request should not contain even a single mention of your disease, your opinions about said disease, or other people's conduct. You must address only your conduct. If you use this talk page for any other actions, I will remove your access to it. Qwyrxian (talk) 23:07, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Because you reinstated the attack, I have removed your ability to edit this talk page. If you wish to request an unblock, you will need to use the Unblock Ticket Request System. Qwyrxian (talk) 01:21, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ANI discussion

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Dbrodbeck (talk) 21:58, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]