User talk:Rs2586

This is Rs2586's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 26)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Theroadislong (talk) 07:14, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rodiex! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 07:14, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ashish Kohli (Dogra Journalist) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ashish Kohli (Dogra Journalist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashish Kohli (Dogra Journalist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Theroadislong (talk) 19:35, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing

Hello Rodiex. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Rodiex. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Rodiex|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Theroadislong (talk) 19:38, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy or request a change of username.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. Additionally, if your contributions to Wikipedia form all or part of work for which you are, or expect to be, paid, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

Please also note that you are permitted to use a username that contains the name of a company or organization if it identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87".

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text

{{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}

at the bottom of your talk page. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names.

Thank you. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 19:40, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rodiex (talk) 20:07, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rs2586 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My name is Rodiex and i didnt belong to any organisation or company Rodiex (talk) 20:07, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Here you say you don't belong to any company but below you say you are the CEO and namesake of the company. And you only said that after it was pointed out you'd already used the company name. Even if your current name is acceptable, there are some other issues here such as conflict of interest and what further edits you intend to make. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 06:31, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

An edit summary of yours clearly says other wise "This project was created by http://rodiex.com/ Rodiex Services LLP] in 2021." Theroadislong (talk) 20:11, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rodiex (talk) 20:17, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Rodiex is my name and rodiex services llp is the firm name. I apologize for that the firm name starts from my name. I will make sure that i will not use the firm name ever in wikipedia, today is the first day when i used it. I promise willnot use the firm name again please unblock my user id and allow me to contribute in wikipedia Rodiex (talk) 20:17, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So you are the founder of the company? 331dot (talk) 22:34, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

yes i am the ceo and the director of the company Rodiex (talk) 03:37, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rodiex (talk) 20:19, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Rodiex, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that they have been paid by Ashish Kohli for their contributions to Wikipedia.

Rodiex (talk) 07:34, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Rs2586 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

new rodiexin (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

recent username was blocked i want to change my username please allow this one so that i can contribute to Wikipedia Rodiex (talk) 07:34, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You said you were not involved in the company, then you admit that you are. Now your new name is awfully similar to the problematic one. You have not addressed the conflict of interest. I will not unblock you as I am not confident that you will not use Wikipedia for promotional purposes. HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 07:36, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ok no problem you can change the username with rs2586. I am apologizing on what i had done please change the username and help me to publishing my new article, i am new in wikipedia. I dont know about the norms thatswhy these issues arise. I will make sure that this will not happened ever again Rodiex (talk) 09:11, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rodiex (talk) 07:40, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Rs2586 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

rs2586 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Old username blocked please allow this username so that i can contribute in Wikipedia Rodiex (talk) 07:40, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You need to directly address the concerns we've been raising. You'll likely only get one more opportunity to do so. Yamla (talk) 13:55, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You still need to respond to the points we have been making. You are close to losing access to this page as well unless you start to respond to our comments. 331dot (talk) 07:59, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry i am new in wikipedia and this is my first article which i had post i dont know about the norms and terms of wikipedia. I apologize what i had done please unblock my username or provide me new username so that i can work on wikipedia Rodiex (talk) 08:14, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rodiex, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Rodiexjk (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 11:29, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

globally renamed Rodiex to Rs2586

globally renamed Rodiex to Rs2586. Deferring unblock as their are other, unaddressed concerns such as WP:COI and using multiple accounts and using Wikipedia for promotion. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:38, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rodiexjk

blocked as an obvious WP:sockpuppet created to evade a block. You are not helping yourself by evading your block. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:43, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rs2586 (talk) 15:32, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

unblock my ip : 106.213.2.153

Sorry, no. You are not to edit until an admin unblocks you. Please stop worsening your situation. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:24, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy pings @Yamla, HighInBC, 331dot, and TheSandDoctor: for new developments and for consideration of unblock. I can't see it, but would be glad to be wrong. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:27, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid I don't see it, either, but if someone does, I won't stand in the way. 331dot (talk) 21:32, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have no problem if another admin feels different, but I don't see improvement here. HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 22:24, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]