Jump to content

User talk:Rod mcinnes

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Rod mcinnes! Thank you for your contributions. I am Marek69 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Marek.69 talk 03:24, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good

[edit]

Kondinin article - please note that the bottom of the article has an alert of sorts - we dont use et al in citations per the WP:MOS.

Also if you are west oz based person - note that we have a set of enthusiastic editors at the WA group in perth - and other things to do with editing in WA in general...https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Western_Australia - if you are elsewhere - at least you have a possible point of contact. User:JarrahTree 01:15, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

First step

[edit]

When leaving a message, they go at the bottom of the previous messages, and you need to learn to WP:SIGN - well worth doing that User:JarrahTree 03:02, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In fact the best is to actually go through the items in the first message above - I haven mislaid my good link for the et al business, hope to get back to you about that. Never be put off by a persons edit numbers, it is more whether they behave civilly on talk pages is always a good measure...

cheers User:JarrahTree 03:06, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of coffee for you!

[edit]
Thanks for your work on the Cremorne Theatre. Do you have a particular interest in it or did the topic just catch your eye? Keep up the good work! Kerry (talk) 23:41, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No I don't have an interest. I was following a link for John MacCallum, Skippy's creator, whose father managed the theatre. I found the site a bit frustrating in that the address, though accurate, can't be followed in a current street map, and the article ignores the existing Cremorne Theatre. I find I have a passion for improving the usability of random pages when I have free time, like today.

I understand entirely; with Wikipedia, one thing does seem to lead to another :-) Kerry (talk) 02:40, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copy and pasting

[edit]

We run "copy and paste" detection software on new edits. One of your edits appear to be infringing on someone else's copyright. See also Wikipedia:Copy-paste. We at Wikipedia usually require paraphrasing. If you own the copyright to this material please follow the directions at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials to grant license. LeadSongDog come howl! 18:52, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Rod! Although not stated, I am guessing this refers to your draft on James Ellis, which reads like something out of the Trove newspapers. If so, it is OK to use verbatim (if pre-1955) as it is in the public domain. However, you are supposed to acknowledge it by doing something like (below) the References section (after the references are dumped out). Note that the reference to the newspaper article here is just me using the "Cite" feature of Trove from that newspaper article (which is an easy way to do it, but it's fine to refer to it in other ways if you wish). I'll drop it in your draft to illustrate. Kerry (talk) 00:05, 1 September 2015 (UTC

Attribution

[edit]

This article incorporates public domain material from "Coppin's Cremorne". The Argus (Melbourne, Vic. : 1848 - 1957). Melbourne, Vic.: National Library of Australia. 8 April 1933. p. 6. Retrieved 1 September 2015.

Copy and pasting Response

[edit]
Kerry, I can't see what LeadSongDog meant either. The James Ellis text is copy and paste, but it is just a text dump in my sandbox which I am going to rewrite. I thought that it would be safe from deletion there. I did copy and paste some text in the main Cremorne Theatre article from a (cited) North Sydney flyer, which I thought would be public domain. Reading the guidelines, it perhaps isn't, so I'll rewrite that. Thanks for the pointers. Rod mcinnes (talk) 07:44, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Kerry, I've now added all the Trove citations correctly. Still working out how to make the other citations look standard.Rod mcinnes (talk) 10:49, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I can help with advice on citations. Can you point me at an example of one that isn't "standard"? Kerry (talk) 21:04, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Any of the other weblinks. I know I'm supposed to use this format:
{{cite web
| last =
| first =
| authorlink =
| title =
| work =
| website =
| publisher =
| date =
| url =
| format =
| doi =
| accessdate = 
| archiveurl = 
| archivedate = }}
But it looks like hard work. My other problem is repeated citations. I tried editing the multiple citation type (a b c d) (eg. the theatre database), but just stuffed it up. I need to know how to define variables. Rod mcinnes (talk) 21:47, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quick tutorial on citations

[edit]

OK, it looks like you already know how to add a pre-formatted citation from Trove. (Let me know if that's not so).

Next, let's talk about non-Trove citations. Saying "it's hard work" suggest to me that you have not yet discovered the "Cite" on the toolbar. If you click it, the arrow to the left of the word Cite will become a downward pointing arrow and you will get a 2nd line of toolbar with "Templates" dropdown, "Named references", and "Error Check". If you look on the Templates dropdown, you will see four options: cite web, cite news, cite book, and cite journal. So when you want to create a citation, click your mouse at the spot in the article where you want the citation to appear (where you would otherwise have started typing <ref>...</ref>). If you select the citation type that best meets your needs, you will get a pop-up form for the commonly used information in that kind of citation. Just fill out the form with as many fields as you know and click Insert. Magically the horrible syntax will be written for you.

As a concrete example, if you wanted to cite the webpage http://www.qpac.com.au/explore_and_learn/qpac/venues/cremorne_theatre/ you would choose "cite web" from the drop down and then fill in these fields:

Then click Insert. What you will see added into the article is:

<ref name=qpac>{{cite web|title=Cremorne Theatre|url=http://www.qpac.com.au/explore_and_learn/qpac/venues/cremorne_theatre/|publisher= [[Queensland Performing Arts Centre]]|accessdate=2 September 2015}}</ref>

which will look like this as a citation:[1]

These forms make it much easier to create citations as you don't have to worry about the messy syntax.

Back to the name above. This is enabling the citation to be reused. So if you wanted to cite that same website at another point in your Wikipedia article, you click your mouse at the spot, click Cite on the toolbar to bring up the 2nd toolbar (no need to click it if that 2nd toolbar is visible), then click on the little clickboard symbol (with the green dot) to the right of "Named references". Now click on the dropdown list and you will see a list of citation names, one of which will be qpac. If you select that entry and then click Insert, what will appear in the article is:

<ref name=qpac/>

which is saying to reuse the citation named qpac. Here I am defining it[1] and now I am reusing it.[1]

  1. ^ a b "Cremorne Theatre". Queensland Performing Arts Centre. Retrieved 2 September 2015.


Note citation reuse only works within an article. You will need to use copy and paste to reuse a citation in another article.

If you have an existing citation in your article that isn't already named (such as a Trove citation), just add the name into the <ref>...</ref> like so:

<ref name=qpac>...</ref>

Note that there is NO slash after qpac. This means "this is the definition of the reference known as qpac". Whereas saying:

<ref name=qpac/>

then I am saying "please reuse the reference known as qpac defined elsewhere in this article". It does not matter if the definition appears later in article or before, just so long as it appears somewhere (you get a red error message if it doesn't when you Save the page).

Does that help? If you email me at kerry.raymond@wikimedia.org.au I can send you a Powerpoint presentation that I use when I teach Wikipedia editing classes. It has lots of screenshots that you might find helpful. If you would like me to talk (as in talk-with-the-human-voice) you through any of this, please email me your phone number and best times for me to call and we can set up a time to talk via phone. Or we can skype or use Google Hangouts; whatever you are most comfortable with. Kerry (talk) 03:07, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Coloured syntax may help you

[edit]

I find it easier to navigate the messy syntax of Wikipedia by using this little tool. Go to Preferences (top right of screen). Click on the tab called Gadgets. Scroll down to the Editing section. 3rd of that list is Syntax Highligher. Tick it and Save (bottom of page). This provides a more colourful editing experience which often makes it easier to understand what is going on with the syntax. If it doesn't help you, repeat the steps above and "untick" it and Save to make it the colouring go away. Kerry (talk) 03:07, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Try the Visual Editor

[edit]

Finally, you might prefer to use the new editor tool called the Visual Editor. This gives you an experience which is more like Microsoft Word. To enable, go to Preferences, then to Beta, then scroll down to the Visual Editor, tick it, and the Save (bottom of page). Now instead of seeing just an "Edit" tab, you will see two tabs "Edit source" (which is the wikitext editor you are currently using) and "Edit" which is the new Visual Editor. You cannot do 100% of everything in the new Visual Editor (yet) but you can do many things and usually a lot easier. It also has the pop-up forms for citations (use Cite > Manual) but also has the Cite > Automatic which can (often) guess what you want to cite just by adding in a URL, then Generate, then Insert. The user manual is here (and it has lots of nice screenshots). I use a mixture of Edit and Edit Source depending on what I am trying to do; there are pros and cons to both so I pick and choose to use the best of both. Again, happy to talk-by-phone you through it if you need help to get started. Kerry (talk) 03:07, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kerry - I've just snuck a look while on lunch. Yes, Trove citations are mastered in my opinion. For the rest: No, I didn't know about the cite button. Lots to read and I've got a busy few weeks, so I might work through this slowly. Rod mcinnes (talk) 03:32, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No worries. Let me know if/when you need any help. Kerry (talk) 07:24, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sam Sailor was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
-- Sam Sailor Talk! 09:28, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Rod mcinnes, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -- Sam Sailor Talk! 09:28, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Reg Inglis (Bloodstock Agent) (September 10)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Flat Out was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Flat Out (talk) 07:29, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You could just add the material to the existing Reg Inglis article. Kerry (talk) 12:19, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Reg Inglis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.  Velella  Velella Talk   03:24, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Onel5969 TT me 18:16, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Onel5969 TT me 02:37, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Reg Inglis (Bloodstock Agent), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:41, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:William Inglis and Sons Pty Ltd, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:43, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Guy Morrison (author and playwright), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rod mcinnes. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Guy Morrison".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 TT me 20:57, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rod mcinnes. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Reg Inglis".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 TT me 19:50, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ringbang was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Ringbang (talk) 17:46, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 10 July

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:17, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Rod mcinnes. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rod mcinnes. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Guy Morrison".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 17:45, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rod mcinnes. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "William Inglis and Sons Pty Ltd".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 03:20, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:William Inglis and Sons Pty Ltd, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rod mcinnes. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "William Inglis and Sons Pty Ltd".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. LinguistunEinsuno 08:20, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Rod mcinnes. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:William Inglis and Sons Pty Ltd, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: William Inglis and Sons Pty Ltd has been accepted

[edit]
William Inglis and Sons Pty Ltd, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 04:05, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Rod mcinnes. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Potentially useful sources

[edit]

After our exchanges on the Carol Raye talk page, I thought you might be interested in a list of entertainment-related sources that I have accumulated since I began editing on Wikipedia. You can find it at User:Teblick/Online Resources for Old-Time Radio Research. The title is a bit of a misnomer, because I have expanded the page's contents to include other areas related to entertainment. Perhaps some of the sources will be useful to you in your own research. Eddie Blick (talk) 15:37, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wollogorang Station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]