User talk:Rockwell05
There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.
If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}}
at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:
- Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
- Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
{{unblock|Your reason here}}
at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:33, 3 June 2017 (UTC)- I've done the rename (from User:Powerhousefilms) and someone else will review the unblock request. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:38, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Rockwell05 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
New to Wikipedia, wasn't aware of rules regarding username not being for advertising or promotion. This has now been changed. Aim of my creation of a wiki page was to create a reference page for Powerhouse Films similar to that of other companies such as Arrow Films - see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Arrow_Films_releases. Aim is not to use the pages for promotion but purely for reference. Happy to do whatever it takes to adhere to the rules. Also happy to use my amended user account to make other Wikipedia contributions.
Accept reason:
I'm going to take you at your word that you have no connection to Powerhouse Films and unblock you. Please read our policies and always remember that information added to articles must be written neutrally and backed up by reliable sources. If you do not follow these policies, you are likely to be blocked again fairly quickly. Good luck. GoldenRing (talk) 15:14, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
- Could you please clarify what is your connection to Powerhouse Films? GoldenRing (talk) 16:56, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
- I have no connection to Powerhouse Films. I am a purchaser of their titles and film collector.
Nomination of List of Powerhouse Films releases for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Powerhouse Films releases is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Powerhouse Films releases until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --woodensuperman 14:04, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of List of Powerhouse Films releases
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on List of Powerhouse Films releases, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for Deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --woodensuperman 11:26, 17 October 2017 (UTC)