User talk:Robynthehode/Archives/2022/April
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Robynthehode. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
your removal of Palais royale at list of tallest buildings in India
Hello, In your last edit to List of tallest buildings in India you removed Palais Royale Mumbai from the list and the reason you gave was that its neither complete or architecturally topped out and that true but the building has structurally topped, it had structurally topped out back in 2018. According to Skyscraper Center Palais Royale is on hold but that is not the case construction is going on in full swing i can see it with my own eyes in fact the full building is lit up at night and the cranes are also lit up at night and construction is clearly going on. Anyone who lives in Mumbai can see that. CTBUH takes a lot of time to update its databases many buildings like 360 west, oberoi sky city etc are already complete and fully occupied but according to CTBUH they are still under construction, Palais Royale is no different the building has structurally topped out and is under construction so i'm restoring the page to the earlier version.Joy goel (talk) 15:59, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
- CTBUH says it is on hold. Unless you can provide another reliable source to say otherwise it should remain out of the list. You seeing the building being worked on is irrevelant. That is WP:OR and is not allowed in Wikipedia. Please take any discussion of this to the article talk page - the proper place for content discussion - so other editors can contribute. But please do not revert my edit without that discussion. Thanks Robynthehode (talk) 19:38, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
As i said in the earlier message CTBUH takes a lot of time to update their databases it does not reflect the correct information.
- Joy goel First please learn how to format talk pages correctly. Second always sign all your posts. Third neither of those sources are reliable sources. They are just commercial business page sites. Certainly not reliable for information about buildings. Robynthehode (talk) 20:31, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
But that's the reality Palais royale has structurally topped out and under construction i can show you a thousand pages like those, Ctbuh takes very long to update it's database I think we should put up correct information on Wikipedia in this case CTBUH is definitely not correct. Joy goel (talk) 20:40, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
- You haven't shown it is structurally topped out supported by reliable sources. Please don't change this without those reliable sources and consensus from other editors. I have copied this discussion to the article talk page because as I said such discussions should be on the article talk page not my personal one. Robynthehode (talk) 06:45, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
The rollback of my edits in the List of Tallest Statues in the World.
I made 5 edits to the page,
- Added an image for a statue
- Added flag template for the Indian Flag
- Added flag template for all flags
- Added one more flag template which I missed out
- Added a newly inaugurated Hanuman Statue (this one did not have a citation)
Instead of reverting the last edit which did not have a citation, which could have been easily sorted out by simply googling and adding a relevant citation, you instead of adding a citation decided to revert the edits, please explain how is this justified?
Xoocit (talk) 08:42, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for your message. It is your responsibility to properly source any content you add to Wikipedia not other editors. See WP:CITE, WP:V. Flags should not be added to list articles as a general rule as per MOS:FLAG. If the image is a suitable one from the commons and does not replace a better previous flag then I have no objection to that. Rather than doing multiple edits that mixes added content - maybe do one type of content addition at a time or take your proposal to the talk page first. Robynthehode (talk) 10:03, 17 April 2022 (UTC)