User talk:RobotGoggles

Unsigned Comment

? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.97.23.137 (talk) 17:21, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment titled by User RobotGoggles (talk) 01:00, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

United States Forest Service March 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at United States Forest Service, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:37, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for discussing this with me. In editing the popular culture section, I cited the game's official website. (which is, in fact, considered a reliable source) The Forest Service plays a mojor part in the game, however, it is not mentioned in the game website. Is that the issue? If so, I don't know how I can fix that. Should I find a transcript of the game's dialogue? I have made a screenshot of one instance of where the United States Forest Service is referenced, and I used it on another wiki specifically for that game. Here is the image:

Firewatch USFS Mug

RobotGoggles (talk) 11:35, 16 March 2016 (PST)

That won't really count as a reliable source on Wikipedia. What are we to do? Google seems a popular site for searching the internet (www.google.com), so I went there and added this to the search box: "Firewatch""Forest Service""Campo Santo". In milliseconds I was able to find two reliable sources which indeed confirm a link between Firewatch (the video game) and the U.S. Forest Service. See here and here. Please take a moment to learn how to add these sources to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:20, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Hello, I'm Mlpearc. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Cesar Romero, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mlpearc (open channel) 18:12, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kopi Sotiropulos Feburary 5 2016.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kopi Sotiropulos Feburary 5 2016.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ambulance chasing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Client. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:49, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Internet phenomena, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bandwagon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Playland (Fresno) (August 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Playland (Fresno) instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft is either essentially the same as the article with the same name, or a subset of the article with the same name. The draft will be replaced by a redirect from draft space to the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Playland (Fresno) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Playland (Fresno), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:49, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RobotGoggles! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:49, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Suicide (drink) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Suicide (drink), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Lapablo (talk) 09:52, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for 2020 American athlete strikes

On 17 September 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2020 American athlete strikes, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that professional athletes protested by refusing to play in response to high-profile police shootings of Black people in 2020? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, 2020 American athlete strikes), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sparta, North Carolina, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greek.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rose Garden Massacre for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rose Garden Massacre is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rose Garden Massacre until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 02:22, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you for this, and especially for your most detailed edit summary. It's nice to know my efforts at article improvement on Wikipedia are appreciated by at least one person. Thanks again, Right cite (talk) 07:04, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure, sir. RobotGoggles (talk) 07:05, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And ... you were just reverted. Seems like a Catch-22. You can't argue for notability because it's not notable in the opinion of others. And you can't add things to the page that show notability from secondary sources because that would be not neutral. In other words, leave it alone, leave it a stub, and delete it. Don't improve Wikipedia. Don't do research. That is just ... disheartening. Right cite (talk) 07:34, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

John E. Hutton, Jr. moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, John E. Hutton, Jr., does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 22:25, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Family of Joe Biden

Interested in your thoughts on this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Family_of_Joe_Biden#Why_only_living_family_members_in_the_infobox? thanks! ciphergoth (talk) 16:54, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:47, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2021 united states capitol protests article

Hi, I see that you are an authorized editor of the article 2021 United States Capitol protests, under section International where it says Australia and PM Sebastian Kurz, it's supposed to be Austria not Australia they are two different countries. Manvswow (talk) 23:00, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'll look into it, thank you, User:Manvswow RobotGoggles (talk) 23:12, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of ArbCom-authorised discretionary sanctions

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has enacted a more stringent set of rules. Any administrator may impose sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--OhKayeSierra (talk) 23:26, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Sierra RobotGoggles (talk) 00:16, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Suicide (drink)

Hello, RobotGoggles. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Suicide".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 13:42, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joker Stairs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joker.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Derek Chauvin cropped.png

Thanks for uploading File:Derek Chauvin cropped.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Tutelary (talk) 22:13, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Nazi Germany. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:12, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cute, kid. Very cute. RobotGoggles (talk) 02:15, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You will be blocked for edit warring if you fail to raise your concerns on the article talk page, and wait for consensus, rather than attempt to force your position. The above retort is not suitable for Wikipedia which relies on collaboration and WP:AGF. Johnuniq (talk) 02:34, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:John E. Hutton Jr.

Hello, RobotGoggles. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:John E. Hutton Jr., a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:03, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Thanks for your contributions to Airplanes (song), keep up the good work. thanks. SomeWhatLife (talk) 17:40, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Hello, I'm WuTang94. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, it's important to be mindful of the feelings of your fellow editors, who may be frustrated by certain types of interaction, such as your addition to Disappearance of Gabby Petito. While you probably didn't intend any offense, please do remember that Wikipedia strives to be an inclusive atmosphere. In light of that, it would be greatly appreciated if you could moderate yourself so as not to offend. Sometimes, I take a deep breather before editing a recent, highly-contested or controversial article on Wikipedia. I've been dinged before when making an edit under high emotions. Also, be careful not to edit war, even if you are "right". WuTang94 (talk) 19:40, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:John E. Hutton Jr.

Hello, RobotGoggles. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "John E. Hutton Jr.".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:42, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quotes

You're going to a lot of trouble putting quotation marks around note names, but they are not required (if there is no space included) and just make more work. Please stop. deisenbe (talk) 13:25, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:deisenbe I have literally no idea what you're talking about. I've not touched any notes in a long while, for months, in fact. RobotGoggles (talk) 16:51, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See [[1]] deisenbe (talk) 20:51, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2023 Writers Guild of America strike, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Universal City.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Status quo

Howdy. I recommend that you seek consensus on the talkpage, for the changes you wish to make in Charles III's lead. Remember, the status quo came about from a consensus reached my many editors, over several weeks. GoodDay (talk) 16:34, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mid Valley Times Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mid Valley Times Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:21, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Please do not restore one of your edits that has been reverted, as you did here, as this may be interpreted as edit warring. Please instead take your dispute to the article's talk page for arbitration. GOLDIEM J (talk) 12:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Caption style

Where in the MOS were you referring to in this edit? I don't see any specific guidance about how to set off dates in Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Captions, and MOS:CAPLENGTH gives examples both with "in" and commas as acceptable. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:30, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

refer to the section on "full sentence captions" and compare it to the previous section. The word "in" is only acceptable when a date is a short caption, not when one is used in a long caption. Compare "Cosby in 2013" with "Oxnard Transportation Center in the morning, 2007"RobotGoggles (talk) 14:47, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oxnard Transportation Center in the morning, 2007 is not a full sentence; the short caption guidelines are still the relevant ones. Furthermore, there is no indication anywhere in the page that "in" is not acceptable in full-sentence captions. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:53, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]