User talk:Robot100

Hello, Robot100. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Adriana Ferreyr, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Flat Out let's discuss it 08:25, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Adriana Ferreyr

please stop remove referenced infos. Thanks. Lenore (talk) 10:22, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Adriana Ferreyr. Your edit summaries appear to be disingenuous and disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Flat Out let's discuss it 12:43, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Adriana Ferreyr shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Flat Out let's discuss it 13:01, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Adriana Ferryr and legal claims

Please do not claim that information is "libelous"; some editor may interpret that as a legal threat, which we explicitly forbid per WP:NLT. That is, you're welcome to take legal action against the Wikimedia Foundation or its editors, but you can't edit while you do so (or threaten to do so). I've fully protected that article for 3 days so that no one can edit it (except admins), so please use this time to discus your suggested changes. I recommend that you read WP:V, WP:BLP, and WP:OR, which are some core policies that apply in this case. Qwyrxian (talk) 13:41, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Adriana Ferreyr, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Flat Out let's discuss it 08:23, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bloqueio na Wikipédia

Caro(a), com relação ao seu bloqueio na Wikipédia em português, infelizmente nomes que façam referência a robôs ou contenham "bot" não são permitidos, pois podem ser confundidos com contas robôs.

É possível alterar o seu nome para um outro que não possua "bot". Se estiver interessado(a), por favor, entre em contato. Boas edições.—Teles «Talk to me˱_{M @ C S}˲» 17:54, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]