User talk:Robert Dalziel

Mr. Dalziel, you misjudge my contributions to th HZ article. If you look through its history over the years, you will notice I have added much of the factual information and all or most of the photos. I understand you are feeling sensitive about the vast tracts that were subtracted from the article, and perhaps and especially if you were the person who added them. I honestly feel they were irrelevant and do not put the subject in context. My major observation is that the material was unsourced. The rules require no original research. Comments about the life and views of Schlesinger et al. belong in an article on Schlesinger. What Google picks up is beside the point. HZ discusses the FBI in his memoir. It is no secret. The long tracts about who the critics are, especially alleging one of them is "prominent" is pure b.s. The material about Kazin belongs in an article about Kazin, not about Zinn. I would be happy to discuss this further with you. Skywriter 06:55, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Daniel J. Flynn

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Daniel J. Flynn requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. 155blue (talk) 13:32, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Daniel J. Flynn

The article Daniel J. Flynn has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This biography is about a man that does not meet the general notability criteria and it cites no reliable sources in its Biography. It is written like an advertisement and it needs to be removed.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 155blue (talk) 11:33, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal has been removed (see talk page)GuyHimGuy (talk) 06:08, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]