User talk:Robert (Bic) Bicknell

Welcome!

Hello, Robert (Bic) Bicknell, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Australian Rostrum. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Ammarpad (talk) 05:17, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Robert (Bic) Bicknell! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 06:03, Saturday, October 7, 2017 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sidney F. Wicks has been accepted

Sidney F. Wicks, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sulfurboy (talk) 23:17, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Adrian Curlewis

Hello, Robert (Bic) Bicknell. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Adrian Curlewis, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Adrian Curlewis to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks,

Owlsmcgee (talk) 07:48, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Response to your email

Per the message at the top of my talk page, if the communication is not confidential, please do not email me. Anyway, I did not delete your draft, all I did was move it back to Draft:Changi University, which still exists. You moved it to the project namespace, which is not meant for articles, so I moved it back. I have submitted it to Articles for Creation on your behalf, and a reviewer will get back to you soon. – Train2104 (t • c) 15:51, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Changi University (January 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SeraphWiki was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Example: Despite some initial reluctant many disadvantaged men were eventually delighted to learn to read or to significantly improve their reading from a very basic standard.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Changi University and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Changi University, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SeraphWiki (talk) 02:48, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Robert (Bic) Bicknell, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SeraphWiki (talk) 02:48, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Changi University has been accepted

Changi University, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Kerry (talk) 09:13, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chester Porter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Queens Council (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions on Military history

Hi Robert (Bic) Bicknell, We’ve noticed that you edited articles related to Military history. Thank you for your great contributions. Keep it up! Bobo.03 (talk) 03:38, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Robert (Bic) Bicknell. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

working with references

Hi Robert. Thanks for adding sources to the Australian Rostrum article. I did some cleanup, since the way the references were formatted were not standard. I would recommend reviewing Help:Footnotes, and in general using a reference template. I appreciate that you found printed sources... are any of them available online? If possible, this would allow editors (like myself) to verify them.

Thanks for contributing to our encyclopedia, and please continue your constructive contributions. Feel free to reach out or visit the Teahouse if you have any further questions! = paul2520 (talk) 14:19, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page replies

Hi Robert. Just some feedback about replying to conversations on talk pages. You don't need to start a new section to say its a reply or response, just go to the next line and begin the line with a colon. This will indent your response, and the indentation indicates it's a response to the comment above. See Wikipedia:Indentation for more information. And as per Wikipedia:Signatures, sign your comment with the four tildes (~~~~) at the very end of your comment. I've formatted your reply accordingly at Talk:Australian Natives' Association because it would get too complicated if each reply had its own section. :) Damien Linnane (talk) 10:14, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Damien Thanks again. I very much appreciate you feedback and the way you impart knowledge. Also agree this is a good place to have a discussion. Robert (Bic) Bicknell (talk) 12:32, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Australasian Women's Association

Hello. The above article looks very promising. I'm worried that it may get deleted for want of more sources. Do you have more sources? I can look around for more or ask for help if needed.--- Possibly (talk) 05:25, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Damien Agreed it is an interestign topic. I have added one additional reference to the registration of their Constitution. Unfortunately the AWA did not get much press and they require deeper digging.

My focus just now is aspect of the ANA. I am expecting a book or two to be published on them this year which I expect will provide more information on the AWA at the same time. Robert (Bic) Bicknell (talk) 12:37, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Credentials

Hi Rob. Just some more information about editing. Have a read of MOS:CREDENTIAL. We avoid using titles on Wikipedia, and as per WP:COMMONNAME you should call people by their commonly known name. For example, you should call the person Carty Salmon, not "Hon. Dr. C. C. Salmon". Past-nominal letters should also be avoided when mentioning someone in passing, such as listing them in a table. Accordingly, a lot of the entries at the list of chief presidents need to be modified. Damien Linnane (talk) 01:39, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK Thanks I am woking though it Robert (Bic) Bicknell (talk) 04:07, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Kirton moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Joseph Kirton, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:54, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joseph Kirton has been accepted

Joseph Kirton, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 13:58, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Request Use of Australian Parliament House Picture

Hi Robert. Re: User_talk:Jjron#Request_Use_of_Australian_Parliament_House_Picture, not a problem, please go ahead. ~~ jjron (talk) 16:37, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]