User talk:Robert25

Minor edits

Please remember to mark your edits as minor when (and only when) they genuinely are minor edits (see Wikipedia:Minor edit). Marking a major change as a minor one (and vice versa) is considered poor etiquette. The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting, and minor rearranging of text should be flagged as a 'minor edit'. Thanks! --WikiSlasher 07:39, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List

S-O-U-R-C-E. Present a source you base the changes on and we'll discuss the matter. Until then, sorry, the article stays as it was. CP/M^comm |Wikipedia Neutrality Project| 02:16, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hillsdale High School

Please do not deliberately introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Hillsdale High School (San Mateo, California). It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Your recent contribution(s) to Wikipedia did not provide specific references or sources. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a drive to improve the quality of Wikipedia by encouraging editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. Editors may choose to remove material you have contributed if it is not verifiable. Please provide specific references in your contributions to any books, articles, websites or other reliable sources that will allow people to verify the content. You can use a citation method listed at inline citations that best suits each article. Thanks! Zedla 06:14, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

responce

this is my high school and i am not the first to do this.

...oh wait, no one gives a damn what i write here.

Questions

I hope I can solve all your questions here. Wikipedia is founded on the policy of Verifiability. This means that nothing on Wikipedia should come from something that is assumed. This includes Katara vs. Toph in The Chase, as well as possible references to real world buildings when designing The Library. Before something can be put up on Wikipedia, it must be proven. We don't know what the library was based on, it could be based on early sketches of the Library of Alexandria. Since we don't know the real answer and only have assumptions, we must leave it off Wikipedia. Hope that clears things up a bit. H2P ^{(Yell at me for what I've done)} 06:19, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Fullmoonpic1.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Fullmoonpic1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --- RockMFR 21:00, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Katara02.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Katara02.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:06, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you for notifying me. I am changing the lisensing immediatley.

Image tagging for Image:Katara03.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Katara03.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:07, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Katara Profile

Saying "I think this should be the new image" is not discussing. If you check the Katara talk page, there's a concern with the AvatarSpirit.net logo. There hasn't been any consent, so stop putting it up over and over again when various people are obviously objecting to the action by reverting it. Y BCZ 19:19, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Dailiships.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Dailiships.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 13:18, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Joshpic2.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Joshpic2.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. The official site clearly claim the copyright for the image so it is not public domain and it probably fails wikipedia's fair use criteria as well.--Eluchil404 21:57, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Crack Yankers

Welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as Crack Yankers) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Pig ^man 04:50, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the speedy deletion tag and all of your text and substituted a redirect to the existing article on this series, Crank Yankers under its correct title. If you want to add anything to this subject, please edit that article. --Proofreader J-Man 05:27, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

People's Revolutionary Army of San Esperito

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article People's Revolutionary Army of San Esperito, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. CA387 02:36, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Al Asarki Mosque.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Al Asarki Mosque.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:05, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Iraq Flag

Please do not change the current flag of Iraq, considering a new propesed flag is undecided. If you have any concerns discuss it on the Iraq talk page.--Abdalla A 02:20, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image of Al-Askari mosque

Copyright problems with Image:Al Asarki Mosque.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Al Asarki Mosque.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sircus 07:15, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This image is copied from the BBC website and is (c) both Reuters and AP.

Non-free use disputed for Image:Trclogo.gif

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Trclogo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:04, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Full Ozai.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Full Ozai.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Derekloffin (talk) 00:26, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Full Ozai.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Full Ozai.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 22:27, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Fullmoonpic1.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Fullmoonpic1.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:14, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Lakers60th.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Lakers60th.gif. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 04:41, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Lakersalternate.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Lakersalternate.gif. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 04:44, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Some kid.png

A tag has been placed on Image:Some kid.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Some kid.png|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. JaGa^talk 02:14, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with File:Lakersspurs.png

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Lakersspurs.png, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.flickr.com/photos/vaguelyartistic/2426578811/. As a copyright violation, File:Lakersspurs.png appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Lakersspurs.png has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Lakersspurs.png and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Lakersspurs.png with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Lakersspurs.png.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 05:25, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Zukopic3.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Zukopic3.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:35, 16 December 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 05:35, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Lisaleslie.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lisaleslie.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 05:36, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Uploading files

Robert25:

Assuming good faith and no prior notice, please note that ALL files uploaded to any of the Wikimedia projects require full media information when available, including author, publisher, date of creation, and copyright status. Copyrighted image uploaded to Wikipedia, or any other place, by anyone but the user must have the proper information and permission. For more information on the subject, see WP:C. If you continue to upload materials without documentation, you may face an investigation. CB...(ö) 23:53, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files listed for discussion

Some of your images or media files have been listed for discussion. Please see Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 August 11 if you are interested in preserving their usage.

Thank you. ★ Bigr Tex 22:44, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!