User talk:Robcamp108

AfD nomination of RASA (band)

An editor has nominated RASA (band), an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RASA (band) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 18:59, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of BLISS (band)

An editor has nominated BLISS (band), an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BLISS (band) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:59, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Robert Campagnola

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Robert Campagnola. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Campagnola. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:20, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of material and references

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Harikesa Swami, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Material in BLP has to follow the sources. Wikid ^as© 22:54, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Harikesa Swami, you will be blocked from editing. Please discuss the relevant material on the article's talk page before removing it again. Thank you. A More Perfect Onion (talk) 13:47, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Onion,

As I am the only one who actually knows anything relevant about Harikesa Swami, it would be counter productive to block me. The reason that I started to correct these inappropriate statements is due to the vandalism that occurred on another page that redirected users of Wiki to this page. A person blanked the page of Robert Campagnola's entry in wiki and placed a redirect to Harikesa Swami. This could not be corrected as the vandalism continued. Therefore I nominated that page be deleted. It seems to have been so. To make any search on Robert Campagnola go to Harikesa Swami is incorrect as it does not reflect the reality of who either of these persons are. Robert Campagnola is not Harikesa Swami. This name was accepted for some time and was left behind. Robert has a totally different life and does not use nor have any connection to this previous name. To remove all entries related to Robert Campagnola and restrict his biography to be related to one isolated incident (his departure from ISKCON) and ignore the thousands of other events with far greater import is not only unfair but it borders on libelous. Why have an entry at all for Harikesa Swami when his only notoriety according to this Wiki is that he took some medicine and left ISKCON? Is this the standard of Wikipedia?

The discography is a joke and has nothing to do with the works of Harikesa Swami who did record 26 albums from 1979 to 1996. The listed albums are, as noted by me, incorrect and are not works of Harikesa Swami. If you argue that the works of Hari are the works of Harikesa Swami then you are making the mistake of thinking that an alias of the past should carry over to the present. Harikesa Swami only relates to a person who lived and worked within ISKCON not to a person did other things. Therefore the entry of Robert Campagnola was created to insure that there was a distinction between the two. Since that did not work, then there is only this entry. If this entry should exist, and I nominated it for deletion because I cannot see how it has any value when the information within it is insignificant and not of interest as a biography when it does not address 30 years of work in ISKCON and only addresses two small events, namely, the initiation and departure. If you are an editor of Wiki, then why are you maintaining this illusion that this text represents anything?

And when I edit it to reflect truth, you become upset. I tried to put a more comprehensive biography that did indeed reflect the history, but that was vandalized. If you allow others who do not know the history and who have an agenda to edit, then why not me who is attempting to stop incorrect and libelous information from appearing? I am not sure of my legal options, but I shall certainly investigate them.

Is verification of a fact a simple act of linking to some text found in some other website? Anyone can write anything in a website, there is no checking of it. I dispute the texts in other websites.

I have restored the full text that was relevant to the biography of Harikesa Swami. It is far more interesting and reflects the history in a broader manner. RobertC - Hari (talk) 14:43, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just to make sure you read up on the rules

Welcome!

Hello, Robcamp108, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Reading on the rules may help, better later than never. Wikid ^as© 23:41, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:08, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]