User talk:Robbie Woodrow

May 2015

Hello, I'm Param Mudgal. Your recent edit to the page Odense Boldklub appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Param Mudgal ^talk? 11:25, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kasper Johansson

A tag has been placed on Kasper Johansson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

References are fake , even the links were added by the page creator deliberately so that this article isn't deleted.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Param Mudgal ^talk? 11:28, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

Hello, I'm Param Mudgal. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Sudan national football team because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Param Mudgal ^talk? 11:39, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 11:50, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Robbie Woodrow (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Administrators, I let my little brother on my computer and and I saw him on Wikipedia looking at a football article and I notice after the block that he must've done it so I promised I'll not let him on my computer again and he'll have to use the family computer. Robbie Woodrow (talk) 14:27, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Refer to WP:BROTHER. PhilKnight (talk) 16:40, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Robbie Woodrow (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Administrators, I didn't know that I was vandalising pages in Wikipedia and I confirm I will try not to do it again and I'll try to remember. Sorry about not looking at the Wikipedia and will sure visit them AFTER you unblock me. Also very sorry about vandalising and not following the rules. Cheers, Robbie Woodrow (talk)

Decline reason:

You have now conceded that your account has been used both by your brother and by a friend. Your account is therefore doubly compromised and will not be unblocked. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 21:16, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Since, per below, this account is either fundamentally compromised or being used fundamentally unconstructively, no point in allowing it post further requests. Max Semenik (talk) 21:17, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't write that request

PhilKnight and other administrators, I didn't write that, It was my friend who wrote it as a joke but I didn't know he posted it, sorry about that.