User talk:Roast Etti

This is Roast Etti's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Naren J. Chitty (March 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Mostly unreferenced.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Naren J. Chitty and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:34, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear DoubleGrazing, Many thanks for having looked carefully at the draft. As you can see I have revised and resubmitted following (as far as I can tell) your guidelines. I am happy to undertake further edits as required. The main reason for this response is that following resubmission and change-of-status to draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review, a message was received from a consultant at Wiki Submissions (from a 51 country code - Peru) offering free consultancy from experts in setting up the webpage. Please advise me if this is part of the standard Wiki process or something other. Best, Roast Etti Roast Etti (talk) 04:25, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, no that is most certainly not part of the standard process, and has nothing to do with Wikipedia. My advice would be to steer well clear of such offers, as you are likely to have your money taken and may not get anything in return. Or at least not anything that you couldn't do yourself for free. Best, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:13, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Roast Etti! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:34, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Naren J. Chitty has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Naren J. Chitty. Thanks! Cabrils (talk) 03:17, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Naren J. Chitty (August 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tutwakhamoe was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to

meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth

Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Relies exclusively on trivial mentions, entry on databases and contents published/co-published by the subject. Please include multiple significant coverage from reliable and independent sources to prove the subject's notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Naren J. Chitty and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tutwakhamoe (talk) 02:18, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Naren J. Chitty

Hello, Roast Etti. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Naren J. Chitty".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:01, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wiki Editors,

Following feedback by Tutwakhamoe on 14 August 2023 and Cabrils on 8 August 2023 the entire draft was completely revised by me. There was no further feedback, but the draft was removed from Wiki Drafts early in 2024. I appealed and it was re-instated. Circa 27 May 2024 Following feedback by Tutwakhamoe on 14 August 2023 and Cabrils on 8 August 2023 the entire draft was completely revised by me. There was no further feedback, but the draft was removed from Wiki Drafts early in 2024. I appealed and it was re-instated. Circa 27 May 2024 WereSpellChequers noted having edited the article and that the author was to be informed. However, I have not received any feedback from WereSpellChequers. There is also a requirement to RESUBMIT and warning “that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again”. As I said feedback has not been provided. I look forward to receiving feedback if resubmission is required.

Thank you for your kind assistance. Roast Etti (talk) 13:00, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]