User talk:Rmujaahida

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Rmujaahida/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 16:16, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Rmujaahida, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 16:16, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Malissa A. O'Dubhtaigh for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Malissa A. O'Dubhtaigh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malissa A. O'Dubhtaigh until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gbawden (talk) 07:53, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Removing AfD template

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Malissa A. O'Dubhtaigh. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:07, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Don't give up please

Hi! I just wanted to say please don't give up on wiki. We need more editors like you adding to the diversity on wiki. Women and non binary gendered people are marginalized. .. but we can fix it. I enjoyed your article and I'll see if she passes GNG tomorrow morning. :) Megalibrarygirl (talk) 04:32, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Likewise! I honestly can't say whether Malissa_A._O'Dubhtaigh is notable according to the complex web of policies, guidelines, and essays that govern these sorts of things. But I can say (and have said as much in the discussion) that you and your article were treated shabbily in the discussion. Only a few know what gobbledygook like BLP1E means or would bother to explain it. But despite everything, I would urge you to get involved with editing and commenting. I hate to come out and say it, but as far as new articles on topics not favored by a few active editors, Wikipedia is closed for business. Most new submissions are marked for deletion as soon as they're received. But just a few days ago, the List_of_unlawfully_killed_transgender_people was saved. So new page work may be dead, but Wikipedia is a big place, and there are a lot of places to make a beneficial difference.--69.204.153.39 (talk) 01:29, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Rmujaahida/sandbox

Hello, Rmujaahida. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:28, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]