User talk:Rmpwork

This is Rmpwork's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shyraa Roy (May 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praxidicae were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

black hat seo spam sites are not sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shyraa Roy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Shyraa Roy, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Praxidicae (talk) 13:28, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rmpwork! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Praxidicae (talk) 13:28, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I need to know the reason behind because i have added all the possible references and news articles to prove that the artist is authentic and established. Rmpwork (talk) 01:51, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shyraa Roy (September 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Noahfgodard was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shyraa Roy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Shyraa Roy, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Noahfgodard (talk) 16:19, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Shyraa During a Photoshoot.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Shyraa During a Photoshoot.jpeg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 18:36, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bu Abdullah for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bu Abdullah, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bu Abdullah until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Aryaan Arora moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Aryaan Arora, is not suitable as written to remain published. Notability is not inherited by available references. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. MickyShy (talk) 05:19, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shyraa Roy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cinema. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Aryaan Arora

Hello, Rmpwork. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Aryaan Arora, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:01, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aryaan Arora

The article Aryaan Arora has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

BLP does not meet WP:NACTOR

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:47, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aryaan Arora for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aryaan Arora is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aryaan Arora until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

MrsSnoozyTurtle 07:59, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Aryaan Arora

Hello, Rmpwork. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Aryaan Arora".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:18, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Rmpwork. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Iseult^Δxparlez moi 14:40, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou so much for these advices

we will try our best to not bring out any advertisement for people.

We are just trying to help wikipedia world by adding public figures articles and we will stick to it on merit basis.

Thanks Rmpwork (talk) 02:41, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rmpwork Please could you also confirm that this account is only used by a single person? Thanks. -Kj cheetham (talk) 12:50, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it is used by a single person to contribute to wikipedia. Rmpwork (talk) 19:24, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Hi Rmpwork! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Ursula Manvatkar that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 12:46, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou for the guidance, will make a note of that in future. Rmpwork (talk) 19:21, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sophiya Anjam

The article Sophiya Anjam has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails to meet the criteria of WP:BIO and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 15:28, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alina Khan

The article Alina Khan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable actress, fails to meet WP:ENTERTAINER and WP:GNG. The references are not discussing the actress but the only film Joyland.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 15:41, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sophiya Anjam for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sophiya Anjam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sophiya Anjam until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

M.Ashraf333 (talk) 05:52, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

the radio personality is notable in Pakistan since last 12 years of her service, all the links and sources are reliable as per wikipedia. there is only 1 interview attach which describes the depth of the personality, it is highly recommend to not delete the article and we will keep improving it with more resources and news links. Rmpwork (talk) 06:09, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alina Khan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alina Khan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alina Khan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

M.Ashraf333 (talk) 07:51, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with RJ Sophiya. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 02:39, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you purposefully and blatantly harass other editors. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contribs)} 06:25, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, but what about harasing us on unnecessary deletion proposals on the pages we contributed? the other editor is harassing openly by putting the articles of deletion even appropriate sources and link are available there, why can’t you see that? Rmpwork (talk) 09:54, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sanak (2023 film) moved to draftspace

Thanks for creating Sanak (2023 film). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because It needs reliable sources to demonstrate the notability per WP:NFILM, meanwhile the subject is WP:TOOSOON. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 01:10, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This item has again been moved to main despite the request that it be submitted for review at an appropriate time. It is not ready for mainspace; there is no plot section, it has not yet been released (WP:TOOSOON) and therefore no critical response. It may now become liable to deletion. Eagleash (talk) 13:02, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

will be adding plot and more reliable sources along with release date, don’t put deletion. Thanks Rmpwork (talk) 13:49, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As the item is in mainspace, it *could* be proposed for deletion at any time. Would suggest returning it to draft to complete development and the AfC procedure. Eagleash (talk) 14:10, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, Thanks Rmpwork (talk) 14:11, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved it back to draft; please develop same and submit for review when more criteria have been met. Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 14:42, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sanak (2023 film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sanak (2023 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanak (2023 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Eagleash (talk) 18:43, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ursula Manvatkar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ursula Manvatkar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ursula Manvatkar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

M.Ashraf333 (talk) 05:27, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sanak (2023 film) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Sanak (2023 film), is not suitable as written to remain published per the AfD in which you participated. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Star Mississippi 19:23, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sanak (2023), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Obsession.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sanak (2023 film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sanak (2023 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanak (2023 film) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Star Mississippi 11:48, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Hello Rmpwork. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Rmpwork. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Rmpwork|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Star Mississippi 11:52, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You also appear to be sharing your account we have created, which is also not allowed. Please declare your conflict of interest and make all related mandatory disclosures. Star Mississippi 11:53, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies if you felt like this is a paid work which is i know completely discouraging from wikipedia policy, No i’m not taking any money for such articles besides i am improving wikipedia articles by contributing Pakistani films to it. and there are multiple articles attached to it which showcase that’s it is authenticated news sourced page or a movie. Rmpwork (talk) 19:49, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for clarifying that. Star Mississippi 23:00, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for sockpuppetry.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Courcelles (talk) 13:27, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

why have you blocked me? state a reason here, and kindly unblock. Rmpwork (talk) 14:32, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome to file an unblock request, but the message is clear on why you were blocked. As you're also eligible to be blocked for your username and this is a shared account, you'll have to make a very convincing case for why you should be unblocked. Star Mississippi 14:49, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Shared account i’m definitely not endorsing to any other account you can clearly indicate from IP Address, as i mentioned i have joined wikipedia 3 years back to promote pakistani films, artists and music and only for those things i make my edits apart from that during AFD of Sanak i could only see my comments and i did not knew that voting more than once is not allowed. i request to unblock so i could contribute to wikipedia in a more principled and better manner, also i will be representing my article with more notable sources to potray my case strong, kindly unblock Thankyou. Rmpwork (talk) 14:54, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is not your article.

Please follow the instructions provided to request an unblock and make a convincing case to the admin who reviews it. Star Mississippi 15:42, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rmpwork (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I believe that my account gives a feel of a paid article formation but that’s not true, i have never charged to any film, music or artist any fees of making a wikipedia. i strong believe the policy of wikipedia is to contribute without any monetary benefits hence maybe my image potrayed wrong impact to the administratives. i present Pakistani arts and music and i am contributing it from last 3 years and more, this is the first time i got blocked please give another chance so i could follow all the principles and policy in order to contribute to wikipedia in more concentrationRmpwork (talk) 15:55, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are blocked for abusing multiple accounts. You'll need to address that directly. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 16:09, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rmpwork (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i can assure you that i have not used multiple accounts to prove my point you can clearly detect that from IP addresses, that is some random account by the name event crest who literally copied my comment in AFD and uploaded his vote, that does not mean i am sharing the account, i am a loyal contributor from last 3 years i don’t wanna be called a abuser in my contribution please give me a last chance and i promise everything will be followed by wikipedia policies i will assure you that. please its a last chance and i am extremely sorry for whatever happened. Rmpwork (talk) 03:08, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It's about more than that, I would think, but I have to defer to a checkuser on specifics. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:21, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Concern regarding Draft:Sanak (2023 film)

Hello, Rmpwork. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sanak (2023 film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:03, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sanak (2023 film)

Hello, Rmpwork. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sanak".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:07, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Arman Ali Pasha for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arman Ali Pasha is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arman Ali Pasha until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Gheus (talk) 19:02, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]