User talk:Rlitwin
Welcome
[edit]
|
Gracias
[edit]
Thank you for starting the article on REFORMA. Maybe I'll see if there's anything in the archives I can add. Welcome to Wikipedia and if you ever need any help with anything, don't hesitate to ask. 8) --Rockero 05:43, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
Go Go Bill of Rights
[edit]Bill of Rights article looks great! Jessamyn (talk) 17:41, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
Danke!
[edit]Thanks for your kind words. Yeah, I'm having a pretty nasty case of patience this week, so.. I thought I'd try this approach out and see if it works. I've always wondered if what I'm trying is possible so... we'll see what happens. If nothing else, it'll look good on my wikiresumé if I ever wikirun for a wikioffice. (you can never have too many wiki prefixes).
Sorry I misattributed the kinds words to Jessamyn instead of you-- I've corrected the error. It didn't stem from any belief that she's nicer than you, though, I promise. When you called it a "good addition", you subsquently posted the sentence "I'm an active member of ALA and a member of ALA Council, like Jessamyn, but not an employee.". At my screen width, her name is the left-most word on the line, so my eyes must have assumed that was the sig. :) whoops! --Alecmconroy 22:42, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
You Are Famous!
[edit]You are famous! You are named and quoted in Librarians "Heroes" at ALA Conference?, Library Journal, 18 July 2006.
- Others were more nuanced. Wrote Rory Litwin, "While our choice to stick with New Orleans as the conference site was laudable, describing it in mildly hyperbolic language as "bravery" placed the discussion in that tradition of self-praise that many of us like and many of us don't like, and have been noticing for many years."
You are famous, and more nuanced!! Now how can I get some quotes in the Library Journal? --SafeLibraries 05:30, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
Subgenii
[edit]to answer your question, I actually know several of the people that were catagorized, and they are not part of Subgenius. Also, if you look at the person's data, you'll see multiple bans, with the sub-genii being the most recent. I looked at every article before cleaning it up. If you have any further questions or concerns, let me know. Rsm99833 01:06, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
uncopyrightable
[edit]Rlitwin: Is there no room in Wikipedia for trivia?!--Nowa 15:01, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
R.R. Bowker
[edit]Thank you for your excellent work in expanding the R.R. Bowker article. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 06:26, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
Wigger article
[edit]Heh, no need to apologize. I'm over it too. I thought I made my case well enough, but if that wasn't enough, "shrug".Snackmagic 01:01, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
Verso
[edit]Rlitwin: You seem very protective of this word. 15:55, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
- Just read the policy: Wikipedia:External links. Nothing could be clearer. Rlitwin 16:53, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
Bibliographic databases
[edit]Let me know if you need a hand with the overhaul on this article or the category. Cheers, ♥ Her Pegship♥ 19:40, 16 August 2006 (UTC) (California librarian)
Re: posses poses possess
[edit]Rlitwin wrote:
- I am not sure your bot is working very well when it comes to "posses." Clearly it's a misspelling of some word, but without looking at the context, how can you tell whether it is meant to be "poses" or "possess"? Rlitwin 21:27, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
This isn't an automated bot, it's just an account for me to do high-speed assisted editing with. So I do look at the context, and select the appropriate word. Since you've left me a message, though, I must have slipped up somewhere... and indeed I have, on American middle class. That was my fault, for rushing through multiple corrections and not looking closely enough at the context of the words. My apologies! Thanks for correcting it – Gurch 21:33, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Hey
[edit]Rlitwin, thanks very much for your thoughtful note. If you've seen the page I linked to, you will have seen the harassment that's been going on since January. I will confess, it's draining. I have no strong feelings about the link in question, and would welcome input from others. If you wanted to post on the talk page that you felt that, on balance, the link ought not to be there, that would be great. Or if you wanted to post the opposite, that would be great, too. You will notice, I did not revert Gnetwerker's edits. I have not in fact done so to any edit he has made with his legitimate account since January (I think I'm right on that, I'd have to double-check to be 100%). If there is an emotional commitment, it is on his part, to harass me away from pages that he feels he owns in some way.
I believe I have been pretty patient, even privately urging involved admins not to ban him, but I'm not going to allow him to bully my edits any longer. I certainly wouldn't want to commit to a bad or wrong edit out of stubborness, but I'm not going to give up in the name of making peace; believe me, I had already tried giving up on many of the articles he stalked me to, but that did not stop the stalking. So now I'm not going to give up on them. But I truly welcome your feedback, positive or negative. IronDuke 20:29, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
- IronDuke. Tell me what page you are talking about. Maybe I'll go in and see if I can help you any. --SafeLibraries 22:15, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
bibliographic databases
[edit]hurrah! I am finally back to editing & saw your note -- glad you're interested in the topic, found the article & want to work on it. Where shall we take it? Right now it's basically a definition, better for Wiktionary than here; there has to be more to say than that! Anyway, always good to meet another librarian :) best, phoebe 06:38, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
- Hi, Phoebe! Thanks for writing. Let's take figure it out on the talk page. Rlitwin 12:46, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
Gorman
[edit]Ah yes! I had forgotten about that. Thanks for catching it. Cheers, ♥ Her Pegship♥ 16:33, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
more on gorman!
[edit]Something has to be done about Michael Gorman (librarian) -- right now it's a copyvio. I'm working on re-writing it, but need more sources as well. I'm on the fence about the controversy section -- it seems interesting, was important at the time, but perhaps not important enough for the article... would be better suited to being a section in a longer article that discussed his career. Thoughts? phoebe 00:19, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
Safelibraries RFC
[edit]As discussed on the ALA talk page, I've gone ahead and asked the Wikipedia community to comment on Safelibraries edits, so that people who are unrelated to this dispute can help guide him. You may want to respond to this RFC at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/SafeLibraries.org. --Alecmconroy 22:25, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
- If you get a chance, please head over there, since the RFC needs to have at least two signers, and more would be, in my own opinion, helpful. Jessamyn (talk) 11:07, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
ESBN article was speedy-deleted by Rich F as a WP:CSD G11
[edit]Hello Rory. For ESBN, see [1]. I think the quick action may be due to the new policy on commercial spam: [2]. Similarly the ISEN.
Since you have been following library stuff, can you tell me if the following are all legit and currently being used? ISAN, ISCI, ISMN, ISRC, ISTC and ISWC? Also, would it be fair to refer to CODEN as obsolete? EdJohnston 14:42, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
librarianship
[edit]The only distinction I have been able to find is that the Rubin Introduction to LIS. book uses librarianship in its bibliography to mean the career aspects of the library profession, librarianship as a careeer. I'm going to give that as one possibility and yours as another, and quasi-synonyms as a third. If you every find some ref, or I do, we'll put it in.
As would be expected, I've been diverted here into a number of other things as well, most lately Gutenberg & related pages, where odd views abound. (I'm also somewhat involved with the competitive project.) Thanks for helping me get started hereDGG 03:22, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
electronic article RfD
[edit]An article I have contributed to relating to libraries, Electronic article, has been listed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electronic article. DGG 02:18, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
List of BibliographicDatabases
[edit]The article, List of bibliographic databases, has just been turned into a redirect, and simultaneously the Academic databases and search engines article has had all the links changed--all of this in the last few days--alll of it , all the links & the redirect by User:Karnesky at the rate of several hundred edits a day. See discussion on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Academic_databases_and_search_engines#links DGG 03:53, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
- I apologize for the language in the edit summary--no matter how many edits, I should not have used "vandalism"DGG 04:23, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on User talk:DGG, by GarrieIrons, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because User talk:DGG fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting User talk:DGG, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate User talk:DGG itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 03:32, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
Alphabetization and collation
[edit]I am inviting you to comment, in your capacity as a librarian, at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style#Alphabetization and collation. -- Wavelength (talk) 20:16, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
request for comments
[edit]Hello, if you have the time, would you mind looking at the LAUSD entry's discussion page and comment on the "teacher librarian questioning" section (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Los_Angeles_Unified_School_District)? Msnora (talk) 17:41, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Library needs you!
[edit]
The Wikipedia Library
Did you know that Wikipedia has its own library? The Wikipedia Library is seeking volunteers from those in galleries, libraries, archives and museums.
- Become an account coordinator to distribute research accounts to editors
- Get involved in some of our special projects:
- Expand our Resources page with free resources for editors in all subject areas
- Help develop a template for citing archival collections
- Write guides to accessing and using library resources
Delivered on behalf of The Wikipedia Library by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:18, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Punctuation
[edit]You undid my correction to the Sic article, claiming, "In American English the punctuation goes inside regardless." You are incorrect. The Wikipedia Manual of Style says,
- On the English Wikipedia, use the "logical quotation" style in all articles, regardless of the variety of English in which they are written. Include terminal punctuation within the quotation marks only if it was present in the original material, and otherwise place it after the closing quotation mark. For the most part, this means treating periods and commas in the same way as question marks: Keep them inside the quotation marks if they apply only to the quoted material and outside if they apply to the whole sentence.
Please put it back the way it was.
J. D. Crutchfield | Talk 18:35, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
per List of information schools
[edit]Thank you for notifying me of the recent comment on Talk:List of information schools. In addition to my reply there, I'll add that the article has had a particular focus on the I-School movement since its first iteration in 2007. — HipLibrarianship talk 05:20, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Rlitwin. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Litwin Books, LLC has been accepted
[edit]
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Onel5969 TT me 19:18, 29 December 2016 (UTC)ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Rlitwin. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Emeritus
[edit]In most US universities, "professor emeritus" means no more or less than "retired professor", and is given to all professors who retire. In some cases, it means "distinguished retired professor", and is only given to some professors. In either case, when a retired professor dies, it is appropriate to say "Professor Emeritus X died at his home in Y", because he was emeritus at the time of death. But it isn't appropriate to say "Jones was a professor emeritus at Z" in a biography. The emeritus part was just a status after he/she retired, and doesn't summarize his/her career. Jones was a professor. --Macrakis (talk) 18:28, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Amelia Bloomer Project
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Amelia Bloomer Project, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:18, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Rlitwin. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Papermill Creek Saloon
[edit]
Hello, Rlitwin. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Papermill Creek Saloon, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:02, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of American National Ballet for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American National Ballet until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.