User talk:Riyyyaa19aaaa

September 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Karuvaki have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Karuvaki was changed by Riyyyaa19aaaa (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.859779 on 2021-09-04T08:38:25+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:38, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Karuvaki. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Materialscientist (talk) 09:28, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Karuvaki have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Karuvaki was changed by Riyyyaa19aaaa (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950577 on 2021-09-13T14:26:52+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:27, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Karuvaki, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Notfrompedro (talk) 16:26, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 09:35, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sunayaana

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sunayaana requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Joyoc Rufin Julius (talk) 09:25, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Charumitra

The article Charumitra has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

One-line unsourced stub, no evidence of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 13:07, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Editing tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 11:59, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Charumitra for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Charumitra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charumitra until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

TrangaBellam (talk) 11:07, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Karuvaki, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kalinga. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Charumitra, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Venkat TL (talk) 09:21, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Susima, you may be blocked from editing. Venkat TL (talk) 09:26, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Karuvaki. Revert to older version and removing most of the unsourced edits by User:Riyyyaa19aaaa Since you are conflating history with a fictional plot of TV serials. Please do not add any unsourced content. Venkat TL (talk) 09:35, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Samprati, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Venkat TL (talk) 09:38, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Karuvaki. Venkat TL (talk) 09:45, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What are you trying to say Riyyyaa19aaaa (talk) 10:02, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou for the advice I'll make sure to add references and not remove them from an existing page. Riyyyaa19aaaa (talk) 10:19, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Karuvaki. Venkat TL (talk) 10:30, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Riiiiiraa19

Are you User:Riiiiiraa19 ? Venkat TL (talk) 10:29, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes Riyyyaa19aaaa (talk) 10:56, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Karuvaki

What are you trying to say Riyyyaa19aaaa (talk) 09:57, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits were removed as they were made without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources. Please do not edit without adding a reliable source to verify your edits. Venkat TL (talk) 10:27, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me please dont revert my edits I'll make sure to add references Riyyyaa19aaaa (talk) 10:57, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's my request to you Riyyyaa19aaaa (talk) 10:58, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have added some references which I knew and the citation needed tag so please dont revert my edits Riyyyaa19aaaa (talk) 11:16, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Riyyyaa19aaaa, If you want more time to search for good quality references then please copy the content and improve them in User:Riyyyaa19aaaa/sandbox. Please do not add any text without a reference. If you add it will be removed. You can always find your content back from Page history also. Venkat TL (talk) 11:32, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have added all the references so please dont revert my edits,please Riyyyaa19aaaa (talk) 11:31, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok sure thanks for the advice Riyyyaa19aaaa (talk) 11:33, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are not listening. Please stop. As you can see here, in this edit, you are still adding several lines without any source for that content. So it has been removed from the article and saved in the Page history. You should not add content with Citation needed tag. Since you are adding that content it is your responsibility to provide citation. You cannot add anything you want with citation needed tag. Venkat TL (talk) 11:42, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The story of the TV Serial Chakravartin Ashoka Samrat is not true history

Hi,@Riyyyaa19aaaa, I understand that you are a fan of the TV serial Chakravartin Ashoka Samrat. But you need to understand that the story of the story of the TV Serial Chakravartin Ashoka Samrat is not true history that you can add in Wikipedia.

At best the characters of the TV Serial Chakravartin Ashoka Samrat, are inspired by the historical characters, Their dialogues and their acts are fiction even though they use the same name as the historical characters of Magadh Dynasty. The Historical character Karuvaki is not the same as the TV Character Karuvaki, even though they use the same name.

If you click this link for the episode, of the serial https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDu-cemsTf4 you will find that the description says, "The accuracy, completeness, currency and/or suitability of the above video description is not endorsed by its licensor or broadcaster or the Channel. They shall not be liable for loss and/or damage arising from the video description." So the serial makers do not claim that their serial is authentic. Wikipedia article on Karuvaki should not contain material from sources whose accuracy is not verified.

What you see in that serial Chakravartin Ashoka Samrat can only be added in the plot line of Chakravartin Ashoka Samrat. Any details about the characters in the serials can only be added next to the Name of the TV character in the list of Casts in the Chakravartin Ashoka Samrat serial. Please do not add to the article of the historical person named Karuvaki. Venkat TL (talk) 13:08, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

But I am not writing or taking inspiration from Chakravartin ashoka Samrat serial like I have read books and my aunt is an history teacher so what I have read I wrote Riyyyaa19aaaa (talk) 13:31, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And I don't even watch ashoka Samrat serial Riyyyaa19aaaa (talk) 13:32, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have never even seen a episode Riyyyaa19aaaa (talk) 13:32, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Which I have read from ashokavadana or from historian M.N Das and the Mahavamsa I wrote that info in wikipedia Riyyyaa19aaaa (talk) 13:33, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And according to Ashokavadana Karuvaki was daughter of a fisherman in Kalinga and chakravartin ashoka Samrat shows that she is the princess of Kalinga Riyyyaa19aaaa (talk) 13:35, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So you see I dont watch or I took inspiration from chakravartin ashoka Samrat Riyyyaa19aaaa (talk) 13:35, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am just adding what I have read Riyyyaa19aaaa (talk) 13:36, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And I have been editing from 2 months and today only this is happening and not only Karuvaki page but even more pages like devi dont have any sources so why just me I was doing my job Riyyyaa19aaaa (talk) 13:38, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you have not seen a single episode of Chakravartin Samrat Ashoka then how do you know that Karuvaki is shown as the princess of Kalinga? Please do not use content from Ashokavadana to edit Wikipedia. You can only use History books authored by historians and published by reputed publishers. With all due respect a history teacher is not considered a reliable authority here. Venkat TL (talk) 13:40, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wait about the Kalinga princess thing my sister watches it and she told that Karuvaki was an Kalinga princess and I knew she was the daughter of Fishermen from Kalinga so Riyyyaa19aaaa (talk) 13:43, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok so you see you said you can use history books authored by historians and published by publishers then wasnt M.N Das a historian Riyyyaa19aaaa (talk) 13:45, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And you say donot use content from Ashokavadana then on Ashoka's page half of the content is from Ashokavadana or mahavamsa Riyyyaa19aaaa (talk) 13:46, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And why only me there are several pages without source of information so tell them too Riyyyaa19aaaa (talk) 13:48, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please indent your posts.

You claim that Ashokavadana mentions of a Karuvaki, who was the daughter of a fisherman in Kalinga. Please cite the page number from John S. Strong's translation.

Even if you are correct about Ashokavadana, you cannot synthesize information from TV shows to claim weird things. TrangaBellam (talk) 13:53, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't matter who watched the serial. You are editing based on the serial, so you are being held responsible. Anyway, I hope I have clearly explained why a serial cannot be used as a reference to add content to wikipedia. You can read more on Reliable source to understand more on this. M. N Das may have edited that book but Ashokavadana is authored by Buddhist monks. They are not a good source of history. So please do not make edits on articles based on Ashokavadana. And you are always supposed to mention the source of your information while making edits on Wikipedia. Venkat TL (talk) 13:50, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So I will but dont revert my edits please as last time I am requesting you and I will find some of the references for sure but till please let me live Riyyyaa19aaaa (talk) 13:53, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia has no deadline. Until and unless you find a proper source, the information will be kept out. TrangaBellam (talk) 13:56, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Everyone I said that I'm not editing based on serial Riyyyaa19aaaa (talk) 13:57, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sure Riyyyaa19aaaa (talk) 13:57, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean by a proper source Riyyyaa19aaaa (talk) 13:58, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proper source is explained in detail Wikipedia:Reliable sources but you will not know until you click and read the page at Wikipedia:Reliable sources. Until then you should edit User:Riyyyaa19aaaa/sandbox and not the articles on Wikipedia. Venkat TL (talk) 14:02, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And see guys I'm an beginner so I dont really know about these wikipedia stuff and I really want you to help me Riyyyaa19aaaa (talk) 14:00, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please indent your posts. You add one colon for each reply; thus, if my post has one colon, your next reply should have two colons, and so on. This creates a pleasing "staircase" which makes it easy to see at a glance where one person's comment stops and another's starts.

This is a not a Facebook chat-box. Take your time and draft a comprehensive reply. Don't publish after writing every single line.

About what constitutes a proper source for historical topics, consult this essay. TrangaBellam (talk) 14:02, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@TrangaBellam Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Riiiiiraa19 Venkat TL (talk) 05:12, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kunala

Please explain why you have removed content from Kunala here in this link. Please do not remove without giving any valid reason in the edit summary. Venkat TL (talk) 13:59, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It was an mistake Riyyyaa19aaaa (talk) 14:01, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ok. Please be careful while editing. After you make the edits, you can click "preview" and check your edits before you publish them. This will prevent any inadvertent mistake like this above. Venkat TL (talk) 14:04, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sure

Riyyyaa19aaaa (talk) 14:05, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia – The Missing Manual

Hi, @Riyyyaa19aaaa. Please refer to the Wikipedia – The Missing Manual to learn about editing. It is a long read, so you can read it in parts. I found it very very helpful. Venkat TL (talk) 14:07, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

But how and where do I read it Riyyyaa19aaaa (talk) 14:09, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

By clicking the link -> Help:Wikipedia: The Missing Manual Venkat TL (talk) 14:15, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Riiiiiraa per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Riiiiiraa19. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 11:34, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sunayana (Ramayana)

The article Sunayana (Ramayana) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Potentially non-notable, please consider merging into another article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 22:37, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]