User talk:Rivanho

Welcome!

Hello, Rivanho, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for helping us build a great free encyclopedia. We have five basic principles, but other than that, we advise that you be bold and edit. If you ever have any questions or need help, feel free to leave a message at the help desk, and other Wikipedia editors will be happy to assist you.

Thanks again and congratulations on becoming a Wikipedian!

P.S. New discussion threads for you will appear at the bottom of this page.

Kirill Pokrovsky

Hello Rivanho,

It seems to me that an article you worked on, Kirill Pokrovsky, may be copied from http://www.kirillpokrovsky.com/biography.htm. It's entirely possible that I made a mistake, but I wanted to let you know because Wikipedia is strict about copying from other sites.

It's important that you edit the article and rewrite it in your own words, unless you're absolutely certain nothing in it is copied. If you're not sure how to fix the problem or have any questions, there are people at the help desk who are happy to assist you.

Thank you for helping build a free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 13:40, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kirill Pokrovsky

The article Kirill Pokrovsky has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 08:12, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: User:Rivanho/Kirill Pokrovsky (November 15)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rivanho/Kirill Pokrovsky.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! ChrisGualtieri (talk) 02:11, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kirill Pokrovsky

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kirill Pokrovsky, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 12:45, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will be removed shortly (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 12:51, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Kirill Pokrovsky may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* {{Russian Wikipedia page| http://www.ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Покровский,_Кирилл_

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:06, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article Suggestions

You should read WP:COI also WP:ARTIST and WP:RS. Those three articles will help you in crafting the article. Trying to direct people to the website and lack of independant sourcing is why I nominated it for deletion. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 12:55, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kirill Pokrovsky

The article Kirill Pokrovsky has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 13:07, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the csd tag and added a BLP Prod which will give you time to add sources to the article. If you do not add sources it will be deleted. Make sure they are seperate from wikipedia and are reliable. Russian language sources are ok. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 13:09, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DO you speak Russian?

пожалуйста, не постоянно менять альбомов, что художник сделал в разделе ссылок. Он не принадлежит там, если вы найдете источники отдельный от источника добавить их в статью. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 13:39, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No I speak DUTCH, i live in Flanders (Belgium)

Do not remove Biographies of Living Persons PRODs from articles, unless reliable sources have been provided. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the respective talk page instead. Thank you. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 13:52, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages as you did with this edit to Kirill Pokrovsky. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 13:59, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dutch

Gelieve niet te houden veranderen van de albums die hij heeft gedaan om de sectie referenties. Dat is een sectie voor derden referenties, moeten we bronnen die niet zijn uit Wikipedia of zijn website te verwijderen van de BLP Prod voegen. Het maakt niet uit of ze in het Nederlands of als ze in een andere taal hebben we gewoon behoefte bronnen aan te tonen de bronnen betrouwbaar zijn en dat hij is opmerkelijk. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 14:07, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry i removed the prod tags again but after i put other sources, hope they are reliablel enough now ?

I removed the tag it looks like e may meet the standard for notability but it at least staves off deletion. Thank you for adding the sources. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 14:21, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So lets hope for the best then if the sources are OK this time, thank you for your support. So I just wait for a few days now and see if the page will stay or not ?

More then likely it will stay. I have done a little searching and he is cited in several sources. I'm a deletionist which means that if I think it's not notable I will have it deleted as my first choice. I could be wrong here but I doubt it. Just drop a line on my talkpage if you have any questions and I will try and help you through whatever issue that comes up. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 14:36, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, there are a few things i cannot correct as i do'nt really know how to correct them: "This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. The specific problem is: MOS compliance." ??? -->What is MOS compliance ??? "This article may be written from a fan's point of view, rather than a neutral point of view." -->I think there is nothing in the text referring to fans. "The topic of this article may not meet Wikipedia's general notability guideline." --> ???

I'd let more experienced editors handle that being that MOS is Manual of Style. those tags just ask for people's help to make sure it looks good. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 15:12, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]