User talk:RightDigital

Edit-warring

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 13:46, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

COI

If you have an affiliation with Frank LaRose, you need to declare so per WP:COI. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 13:46, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello - The issue here is that you've added content that is politically biased, unbalanced and not completely factual. I'm not looking to get into a war here going back and forth but you haven't exactly proposed a solution that is objectively fair to this individual. If you'd prefer to discuss this via email instead of wiki, I'd be happy to exchange contact info and see if we can come up with some objective edits that are agreeable to all editors. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RightDigital (talk • contribs) 15:05, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

COI 2x

You have been mentioned here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#More_problems_at_Frank_LaRose Snooganssnoogans (talk) 14:13, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, RightDigital. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Frank LaRose, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 14:22, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Your account has been blocked from editing Wikipedia because your username, RightDigital, does not meet our username policy. Your username is the principal reason for the block. You are welcome to continue editing after you have selected a new username that meets the username policy guidelines, which are summarized below.

Per the username policy, a username should represent an individual and should not: represent a group or organization; be promotional; be misleading (such as indicating possession of special user rights or being a "Bot" account (unless approved for such purposes)); be offensive or otherwise disruptive. However, a username that contains the name of a organization and also identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87" is allowed, though, among others, the guidance on conflict of interest and the policy of paid-contribution disclosure are relevant.

You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our username policy guidelines and create the account yourself. Alternatively, if you wish for your existing contributions to carry over under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:

Adding {{unblock-un|your new username here}} below. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "Email this user" from their talk page.
At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a change of name request.
Your requested new username cannot already be in use. Therefore, please check the list here to see if a name is taken prior to requesting a change of name.

Appeals: If, after reading the guide to appealing blocks you believe you were blocked in error, then you may appeal this block by adding {{unblock|Your reason here}} below this notice.

Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 18:15, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

RightDigital, I received your email. If you are being paid to edit Wikipedia articles, then you must disclose that and also disclose who is paying you, on any Wikipedia account that you use. Please read WP:PAID carefully, and comply, because this is mandatory and non-negotiable. I see that you have been engaging in edit warring. That is a blockable offense so you must stop that behavior if you want to continue editing Wikipedia. You are also accusing other editors of being "Ohio Democrat Party staffers". In other words, you are accusing other editors of the exact same behavior that you are admitting to. If you have actual evidence that these edits were made by undisclosed paid editors, then present your convincing evidence at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard. Be aware that your own behavior will come under scrutiny there, as well as the behavior of the other editors that you are complaining about. Also be aware that neither Frank LaRose nor any other politician in the world has any right to control their Wikipedia article, which will summarize significant coverage, pro and con, published by reliable independent sources. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 01:06, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

RightDigital, I received your second email. Blocked editors can post on their own talk pages unless they abuse that right. Otherwise, how would editors be able to appeal as described in the block notice? A Wikipedia editor is never a "reliable independent source". Rather Wikipedia editors cite reliable independent sources as references, and summarize what those sources say. Your reversions repeatedly removed such references. As for deleting your account, that cannot be done. You can change the name of the account as described above, or you can abandon it and open a new account. If you are unhappy with any of the content, you can explain why at Talk: Frank LaRose once you are unblocked, using the edit request function. Please do not edit that article directly if you are paid, except to deal with unambiguous vandalism. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 15:57, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]