User talk:Richcherry

Rich Cherrys Talk Page

Wikimedia@MW2010

I am attending and supporting some Balboa Park museum staff to attend Wikimedia@MW2010 [1]in April, a workshop for exploring and developing policies that will enable museums to better contribute to and use Wikipedia or Wikimedia Commons. This meeting will be attended by Wikimedia Foundation Board members, staff, and Wikipedia editors as well museum professionals from across the country.

Your invitations to local wikipedians

Hello! You posted a message on my talk page about a possible meeting between existing wikipedians and Balboa Park museum people. I assume you are sending this to people who have contributed to articles about Balboa Park or San Diego. I gather this would be in advance of your Wikimedia meeting. I might be interested but I would need to know more about it, what your goals are and what your expectations are. (As I'm sure you know, Wikipedia takes a very dim view of paid editing, promotional editing, self-serving or conflict-of-interest editing, etc. - so we would need to be sure you aren't just looking for a bunch of people to plant good stuff in Wikipedia for you!) But as you gather information and names, please keep me informed. --MelanieN (talk) 23:56, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Balboa Park Local Wikipedia Meeting draft Goals

1. Introduce the real people behind the names that create and edit the articles on Wikipedia to the real people that work at local cultural institutions.

2. Inform cultural institution staff about how Wikipedia works, what the rules are and why Wikipedia is important to them

3. Open a local dialogue to determine how local cultural institutions could work with local wikipedians and vice versa.

4. Provide behind the scenes access to local Wikipedians to the cultural institutions of Balboa Park.

I would appreciate your comments on the above goals and if your still interested, any help you might be able to give in suggesting other potetial attendees. Richcherry (talk) 00:21, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's a tough one - for several reasons. One, I am relatively new here; two, a lot of Wikipedians don't reveal where they live, and three, many of the people who edit regularly on San Diego subjects actually live elsewhere. I'm not sure there are even enough of us identifiable to have a meeting! You might consider asking User:Ohnoitsjamie, User:Born2cycle, User:SoCal L.A., and User:Alex537. If they are interested they might be able to suggest others. (BTW, just now in looking for names I realized that some of the articles need serious work - for example, Reuben H. Fleet Science Center needs references added - and I added them to my to-do list.) --MelanieN (talk) 23:56, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Museums and the Web LLC

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Museums and the Web LLC, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Lapablo (talk) 21:58, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Richcherry

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Richcherry, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of https://www.museweb.net/author/rich-cherry/. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 22:16, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright and conflict of interest

You cannot post copyrighted material on Wikipedia even if you are the copyright holder, unless special licensing permissions are in place. In short, a copyright owner cannot offer Wikipedia a one-time license for use. Rather, the copyright to the material has to be released – permanently and irrevocably – into the public domain or under a free copyright license that is compatible with Wikipedia's licenses. This is because Wikipedia aims to be freely distributable and copyable by anyone, so all content must be licensed for that purpose. You can learn more about this policy at Wikipedia:Copyrights.

Also, if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 22:20, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]