User talk:Richardson j

Hi

Hello

This is my talk page .

Vandal

Hello. In regard to your situation, I suggest you confront the vandal responsible. Talk to him, and try to work things out. Cheers,Je t Lover (Report a mistake) 01:47, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you email me with some details (your IP address), I can look into it some more. I might be able to block just the IP (not accounts on it) with a block on account creation. Mr.Z-man 22:39, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, if you have a dynamic IP address it won't work. Mr.Z-man 00:59, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Adelaide Wikimeetup 3

Adelaide Meetup
Next: 15 November 2024
Last: 6 March 2020
This box: view • talk • edit

Hi Richardson j - after some planning we've decided to hold the third Adelaide Wikimeetup on Sunday, 17th February, 2008. The meeting will be held at Billy Baxter's in Rundle Mall at 11:30AM. Further details and directions are available on the meetup page. Please RSVP here by 20:00UTC on 15th February 2008 (that's 6AM Saturday for our time zone) so that we can inform the restaurant about numbers. Hope to see you there!

You are receiving this message because you are in Category:Wikipedians in South Australia or are listed at WP:ADEL#Participants. If this has been sent in error, please accept our apologies!

On behalf of Riana ⁂, 11:30, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah Natochenny

Responding to your note on my talkpage, I think the problem the other editor has with the material that he reverted from the article is that it is statements of opinion rather than written from a neutral point of view and does not cite any reliable sources. This is helpful in any article, but especially important where the article falls with in the biographies of living persons policy. If you can improve the material based on these guidelines, you might be able to develop a paragraph that both sides can be happy with. Good luck. Newyorkbrad (talk) 23:21, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Sarah Natochenny

An editor has nominated Sarah Natochenny, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Natochenny and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:59, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Richardson j (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why I'm accused of abusing multiple,in fact I couldn't edit this page using my normal account

Decline reason:

So you have another, "normal", account. That's an indication for abusing multiple accounts right there. Sandstein 10:37, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Suggestion for blocked user

Using alternate accounts to post an unblock request generally won't help your case, and will usually hurt your chances of being unblocked. Since you cannot edit your talk page on your main account, the best thing you can do at this point is to cease using any further accounts and email the ArbCom's Ban Appeals Subcommittee asking how you can become a contributing editor to Wikipedia. It's very difficult to be reinstated if you're blocked for abusing multiple accounts, so if you go this route, you will have to take it very seriously and follow any instructions or advice the arbitrators give you. Under no circumstances should you continue using alternate accounts. You need to show the community that you can be trusted to edit again, and using alternate accounts to evade your block will just cause the community to distrust you more. --Tathar (talk) 06:55, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]