User talk:Richard Relucio

Per today's notice at the Arbitration Committee noticeboard, the Ban Appeal Subcommittee of ArbCom has decided that Richard Relucio's indefinite ban is suspended on the following conditions:

He is indefinitely restricted to one account;
He is topic-banned for three months from articles related to Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila broadly defined and thereafter an indefinite 0RR restriction;
He is indefinitely restricted from uploading files (though this could be relaxed later if the editor finds a mentor willing to supervise and advise him on copyright, fair use etc);
The community ban may be reimposed at any time by motion of ArbCom if the editor engages in sockpuppetry; behaves disruptively; or fails to comply with the spirit or letter of these terms.

The editor has accepted the above conditions by email and has therefore been unblocked.

For the Arbitration Committee, Roger Davies ^talk 14:36, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Temporarily reblocked

As it appears that you have been socking with User:Nash17 and you have failed to respond to my email about it, I have reinstated the block pending an explanation. Roger Davies ^talk 10:29, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Having now examined the technical evidence, we accept that User:Nash17 is unlikely to be a sock of yours and accordingly the block has been lifted. Roger Davies ^talk 13:13, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My answer

I wasn't socking with Nash17. I'm not him. I have NOT edited at Wikipedia in a LONG time. As I had told you before (through email), I will never edit at Wikipedia until my ban is fully lifted. I've gone through several months of waiting just to have my ban relaxed by the ArbCom, and this is not easy to be suspected of something I am not or did not do. Please investigate this further, I'm tired of this. Richard Relucio (talk) 06:59, 14 November 2009 (UTC) Richard Relucio[reply]

Thank you

Thank you Mr. Davies for the justice, fairness and equality that you and the whole Wikipedia Arbitration Committee have given me. I've just started editing an article, but I will patiently wait until my full ban expires on 24 January 2010. Richard Relucio (talk) 15:38, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Victory and Justice

24 JANUARY 2010: Victory is mine, justice prevails...

The Wikipedia Arbitration Committee has ruled over my case and decided to fully lift the ban previously imposed upon me! I AM BACK!!!

Richard Relucio (talk) 00:40, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pamantasang Mahal

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Pamantasang Mahal, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://en.wikipilipinas.org/index.php?title=Pamantasang_Mahal. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:23, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This article was originally from Wikipedia. But because I got banned before, it was deleted here. If you will see this entry at Wikipilipinas, you'll see that there's an annotation there that it was taken from Wikipedia; thus, not a Wikipilipinas original. If this is not possible to maintain or recreate the same article, then I'd gladly comply with the admin. However, I'd like for them to help me find ways to "legalize" the creation of a previously deleted article. Thanks for understanding. Richard Relucio (talk) 15:34, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have decided to rewrite the article and start from scratch. Please allow me some time to substantiate the entries. Thank you. Richard Relucio (talk) 15:44, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pamantasang Mahal

A tag has been placed on Pamantasang Mahal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bluemask (talk) 11:04, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Poblacion.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Poblacion.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:19, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010

Unblocked

I'm sorry, Richard, these uploads were in 2009 not 2010 and therefore there was no breach of your probation. I've unblocked you. Apologies, once again for the mix up. Happy editing, Roger Davies ^talk 21:41, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This seems to have happened because I came across an image you'd uploaded and tagged it for deletion. Anyway, it would be great if you could look at the images you uploaded back then - see here - and check that they are all correctly licensed. If you need any help or aren't sure, please let me know. Best regards, Angus McLellan (Talk) 00:02, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Hi, I was Nash17 until I was blocked indefinitely. Actually, my 3 former accounts, including my previous account Nash17, were all blocked indefinitely...

I want to ask how did do that to get your account unblocked... because I wanted to unblock my 3 other account so that I can cancel them and I can focus on 1 account which is what I'm using now...

Hope for your answer and more power...

Nash18 (talk) 07:00, 19 March 2010 (UTC)Nash18(talk)[reply]

You can request from any administrator to have your other accounts deleted; I think they will be willing to do that for you. It will be helpful if you tell them that you really want to concentrate on using just one account. Richard Relucio (talk) 16:26, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of universities with industrial engineering faculty

An article you contributed to, List of universities with industrial engineering faculty is being considered for deletion in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policy. Please share your thoughts on the matter at this article's entry on the Articles for deletion page.--Paleorthid (talk) 19:16, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit to El Nido, Palawan

Sir,

I've reverted your edit re "minor details" in the El Nido article. Please continue discussion here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:El_Nido,_Palawan#Which_sitios_were_constituted_to_what_barangays_are_important_details —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ed558 (talk • contribs) 00:42, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSC02241.JPG missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:DSC02241.JPG is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Fallschirmjäger ✉ 17:11, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Attribution of Images

File:DSC02241.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:DSC02241.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 19:28, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tagbanwa.gif listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tagbanwa.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:47, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:El Nido seal.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:El Nido seal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:19, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Westminster High School (Manila), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Private. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:12, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Richard Relucio. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Ocean Park Manila Bay.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Ocean Park Manila Bay.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:PLM College of Nursing at Gusaling Katipunan.jpg

The file File:PLM College of Nursing at Gusaling Katipunan.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of File:Tagbanwa.gif

The page File:Tagbanwa.gif has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done for the following reason:

Now on Commons

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 15:33, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Rajah Solayman Gymnasium.jpg

The file File:Rajah Solayman Gymnasium.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Westminster High School, Manila (February 2007).jpg

The file File:Westminster High School, Manila (February 2007).jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Francisco Martin (Singer)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Francisco Martin (Singer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Less Unless (talk) 15:52, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Francisco Martin (Musician)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Francisco Martin (Musician) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Tatsaviturvarenyam (talk) 08:06, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Francisco Martin (Musician)

The article Francisco Martin (Musician) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Simply appearing on American Idol doesn't seem to make one notable per WP:MUSICBIO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 18:24, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Magwayen" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Magwayen. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 22#Magwayen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 16:28, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:PLM CN.jpg

The file File:PLM CN.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned image, no context to determine possible future encyclopedic use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 07:14, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Muntinlupa.jpg

The file File:Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Muntinlupa.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned image, low quality

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 07:14, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PLMUNlogo.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PLMUNlogo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:53, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pamantasang Mahal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pamantasang Mahal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pamantasang Mahal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Hariboneagle927 (talk) 13:42, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]