User talk:Rich nffc
Hello
[edit]Welcome to my talk page.
If you want to tell me off for vandalizing a page, please do so in here :)
If you want to praise me for a good contribution, also please do so in here :)
Thanks, Rich 16:21, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Edits to Derby County F.C.
[edit]Just a small request... please use actual dates in articles, as words like 'today', 'tomorrow' etc quickly become outdated. Cheers. --Jameboy 20:57, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
May 2008
[edit]Welcome
[edit]Welcome back to Wikipedia. To stay in Wikipedia, an article has to be about something notable, that is, of general interest. Click on Notability for an explanation of what that means. Also, it must give independently verifiable sources. Articles that don't meet these requirements are likely to be deleted. Follow the links below to learn more:
- To find out more about creating articles, read the Introduction and the Guide to creating your first article.
- You should not write articles about yourself, your band, or your best friend - that's a conflict of interest.
- Wikipedia is not an advertising service. Before writing about your own business, read Business' FAQ.
- For experiments, please use the sandbox.
JohnCD (talk) 17:58, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article My home, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? JohnCD (talk) 17:58, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of My home
[edit]An article that you have been involved in editing, My home, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My home. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? JohnCD (talk) 18:05, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
Your recent edits
[edit]Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 18:32, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
Your home
[edit]I'm not anti-British, in fact I'm British; but I'm interested in keeping Wikipedia a useful encyclopedia, not just an indiscriminate collection of information. The way to do that is to insist that articles have to be about something of enough general interest, defined as notability - see policies like Notability and guidelines like Notability (places and transportation). Regards, JohnCD (talk) 18:42, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
Ok, that's fair enough. I just wanted to see if I was capable of building a location article. I'm trying to give places in Derbyshire a higher profile on Wikipedia, and have made a large contribution to a lot of local articles, especially Codnor, I did also create Loscoe, but I'm worried it's not a big enough village to be considered Notable? Rich 18:48, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
- Loscoe should be OK (I've added "England" for the benefit of non-Brits, there are probably other Derbyshires in the world!) Any village big enough to appear on the map is usually accepted. Suburbs and districts are dodgier, unless they have some distinct character, and housing estates and shopping centres even more so. WP:NPT is the relevant guideline - it's only a proposal, not set in stone, but it gives an idea of what's acceptable. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 19:09, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
Reverts
[edit]Hi! If you think an article should be deleted, please tag it for deletion. For this, see WP:AFD. Blanking a page is (almost) never the right thing to do. Most of the time, it constitutes vandalism. Ok? --Abrech (talk) 19:15, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
Ok I will do.
- Good and thanks. I have deleted the warning message because I think it's not appropriate anymore. Kind regards, --Abrech (talk) 19:15, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
- I see what you were trying to do, but there is a better way: you can change the title of a page by "moving" it - click the "Move" tab at the top of the page and fill in the new title on the form that appears. Then the old page is left behind as a redirect, and if it's not useful you can put {{db-r3}} at the top, which asks for it to be speedily deleted. Blanking a page is something vandals do, and triggers all sorts of (human and automatic) alarms. If you want to get rid of a page where you are the only author, you can put {{db-author}} at the top. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 19:18, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the advice! I've still got a lot to learn on Wikipedia so I'll make sure that I try to do things like that in the correct manner.
- Your attempt to move Kilburn, Derbyshire to Kilburn by just copying the text and then deleting the original article would violate Wikipedia's copyright license by eliminating the edit history. Please don't do that. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 19:35, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
EXCUSE ME? I think you're wrong. Please stay out of this. I'm not editing maliciously at all.
And copyright, when I've wrote most of it at a friends house???
- I will accept that you are trying to do the right thing, but you are not succeeding. You copied the full text of Kilburn, Derbyshire to Kilburn instead of moving it. If we now delete Kilburn, Derbyshire, then the edit history will disappear. That would violate the GNU Free Documentation License. That's in addition to the fact that Kilburn, Derbyshire, is not the largest place named Kilburn even in its own country; Kilburn, Greater London appears to be more populous. So it's not clear to me why the Kilburn in Derbyshire gets the plain name, and in fact I have changed Kilburn to a redirect to Kilburn (disambiguation). Several different editors have contributed to Kilburn, Derbyshire, so it's not clear to me how I can confirm that you wrote most of it. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 19:40, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
Ok, sorry. Kilburn, Greater London, isn't actually a town in it's own right. It's an area divided between three London boroughs, and people who live in that area wouldn't say they lived in Kilburn, surely they'd say they lived in one of the three boroughs instead? Can the warning please be deleted? I'm editing in good faith. Rich 19:44, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
- Just to be clear, people who live in Kilburn definitely do say they live in Kilburn, it's a district and people identify themselves with districts far more than boroughs, which are local authorities and cover a fairly wide area. ArtVandelay13 (talk) 20:00, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
- That's all right. I have removed the harsh part of the warning. If it is considered really desirable to move Kilburn, Derbyshire to Kilburn, please discuss that on an appropriate talk page and get a consensus first. Then the page can be moved using the proper "move" function rather than cutting and pasting the text. Even then, a redirect must be left at Kilburn, Derbyshire -- that page should never be deleted entirely, just left as a redirect in case of a move. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 19:49, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
Cross Hill merger
[edit]Hi Rich
Merger is a good idea. I created the page from a red link in List of places in Derbyshire; it's not the smallest "place' to have its own page, there's probably quite a few that could be merged. Ning-ning (talk) 18:34, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
Yeah I have noticed that too, for example these three articles all co-exist: Aldercar, Langley Mill & Aldercar and Langley Mill Rich 08:49, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
- I have a view (not widely endorsed) that in rural areas, the Wikipedia article should be at the civil parish level. So in this case Aldercar and Langley Mill should both be redirects to Aldercar and Langley Mill. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 07:13, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Vandalism on my page
[edit]"This user thinks that mentioning Diet Coke and Mentos in a Wikipedia article is advertising! How silly."
Actually it is. Wikipedia is a not for profit encyclopedia, doesn't have advertising, and you don't need these products to produce the effect described in the article. And I'm speaking as someone who's produced some of these fountains with other soft drinks... It's a stupid article, but it doesn't need blatant product placement in the title and pictures.
And leave the racist Groundskeeper Willie jokes somewhere else... I decided to clype on you for mucking around on my homepage.--MacRusgail (talk) 15:58, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing.
March 2011
[edit]Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Surviva. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —KuyaBriBriTalk 20:32, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
[edit]Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rich nffc for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Cind.amuse 22:28, 3 March 2011 (UTC)