User talk:RichSwietek

Welcome!

Hello, RichSwietek, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Rankersbo (talk) 07:18, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! RichSwietek, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dragons: Real Myths and Unreal Creatures (October 28)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.

If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Rankersbo (talk) 07:13, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, the article seemed to be a lightly re-written version of the programme's publicity booklet. You can use the booklet as a source of facts, but the article must be in your own words and not just a re-hashed version of someone elses. The article was excessively wrong and most the sources supported facts about dragons rather than the notability of the film itself. Rankersbo (talk) 07:18, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your message on my talk page

The message above was not from me - you can see who sent it by the signature at the end. However, I will reply to your points:

The copyright problem is not because of your previous version, but because you have copied wholesale from other websites. You say you "did not merely copy and paste from another source" but, to take just one example, your section "Tiamat" is a word-for-word copy of this, and the same is true for other parts I checked, many from here.

Copyright is a very serious issue for Wikipedia, so both human and automatic systems check incoming articles. Just changing a few words does not avoid a copyright violation; please read WP:Copy-paste and WP:Close paraphrasing. For instance, your article says:

"the legend of dragons unfolds through a conversation between Skye Ingram (Laurence Leboeuf), a young woman with recurring nightmares of dragons, and Dr. Alistair Conis (Max von Sydow), an eccentric dream therapist and expert on dragons"

which is much too close to your source in the website:

"dragon legends unfold through a conversation between Skye Ingram (Laurence Leboeuf), a young woman troubled by recurring nightmares of dragons, and the peculiar Dr. Alistair Conis (Max von Sydow), a dream therapist of sorts and an expert on dragons."

You must write in your own words. A good way to avoid unwitting copying is to read your sources thoroughly, go and do something else for a few hours, then come back and write without referring to the sources. After you have done that, you can check against them for accuracy.

The article seems unfocussed, wandering from a synopsis of the film to biographies of the actors and general discussion about dragons. We already have articles Max von Sydow, Laurence Leboeuf and Dragon, with subsidiary articles like Slavic dragon and Chinese dragon. An encyclopedia article should have a single theme: if this is about the film, I suggest you write a shorter article that concentrates on the film. More points:

Check out WP:Notability (films) and look for independent references, e.g. reviews, to establish notability.
Be careful not to sound promotional; avoid "peacock terms" like unique. If you article seems to be trying to sell the film, it will not be accepted.
Read WP:WAF; the article should not be entirely "in-universe" about the world of the film, but should cover real-world information about its making and its reception.
Look at WP:WikiProject Film: under the heading "Announcements and open tasks" there are lists of "Featured article candidates" and "Good article candidates". They will give you an idea of what an article about a film should look like.

Regards, JohnCD (talk) 16:14, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dragons: Real Myths and Unreal Creatures - 3D (January 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Dragons: Real Myths and Unreal Creatures - 3D.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:57, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Dragons: Real Myths and Unreal Creatures - 3D was accepted

Dragons: Real Myths and Unreal Creatures - 3D, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:25, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]