User talk:Riah101

Come play the Wikipedia Adventure!

The

Adventure

Hi Riah101!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. Hope to see you there!

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered by 5 albert square (talk) 21:52, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Hello, I'm Arjayay. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Mugdha Chaphekar, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 09:00, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi sorry it was a mistake my bad. But I’d like to ask you something. Mugdha Chaphekar age is already been confirmed and this too by Google and they are always right. How come you haven’t included her age yet on her Wikipedia page? Google has said she’s 34. Riah101 (talk) 00:33, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I noticed there’s now some information added on the article: Mugdha Chaphekar. Her age has now been added. Was this done by you? Riah101 (talk) 12:37, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Arajay, can I request you to please lock the Wikipedia page ‘Kumkum Bhagya’ as many people are editing it which is making it confusing. Please fix the information and lock the page. Thank you Riah101 (talk) 20:57, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Pooja Banerjee. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 19:23, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mugdha Chaphekar

Hi Riah101. It would seem that you have a conflict of interest with the subject of this article. Yourself and the IP82.30.146.167, who I assume is yourself as you're both making the same edits, have apparently been skewing the article a particular way. To be honest it appears to be PR or vanity editting, and deleting references isn't the way to go. Do you have any relationship to the subject of the article? Thanks ActivelyDisinterested (talk) 00:47, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi sorry, I don’t think her age is right. That’s why I edited it. Her age isn’t confirmed Riah101 (talk) 23:48, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kumkum Bhagya

Hi. Unless you formally represent the network, please stop adding the copyrighted image from Commons. English Wikipedia allows fair use images; Commons does not.

If you do represent the network, you can follow this process: c:Commons:Email templates. Unfortunately I had to block your account (on Commons, not here) because we've tried pinging you multiple times and you are not responding. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 13:50, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The actors in the current montage which you changed aren’t in the show anymore. Please change it as it will confuse people Riah101 (talk) 03:16, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Hello, I'm Ab207. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Alia Bhatt, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.
Please do not change surname post marriage without evidence. This is not automatic. Ab207 (talk) 05:03, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sriti Jha. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. In this source, the Jha says that the 'asexuality' is associated with the subject of her poem, not herself. So please do not remove/change sourced content. If you have issues, bring reliable sources in support of your revisions in teh talk page and gain WP:CONSENSUS. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:40, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Hello, I'm Ravensfire. I noticed that you recently removed content from Kumkum Bhagya without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Ravensfire (talk) 15:27, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Block evasion

Don't create new accounts on Commons (or here) to get around a block. That's sockpuppetry, a form of block evasion, and it's not tolerated. You were blocked there for copyright issues. Ignoring that and creating a new account that continues with the same problematic uploads and thinking nobody will spot it is just foolish. I will be starting a request on Commons to have that account blocked there. Please don't use it to edit here and don't create any more. Ravensfire (talk) 16:45, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you won’t let me or anyone edit with rightful info then do it yourself. I’m just updating the Kumkum Bhagya Wikipedia montage as it’s shown on the channel and tv. If you can do the same with Kundali and Bhagya Lakshmi then why not the same here. And its rightful copyright. I have the right to do so Riah101 (talk) 19:11, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's the problem, you don't have the copyright. That's generally going to be the broadcast company that owns the copyright. Unless the image meets the WP:NFCI criteria for non-free images, it MUST have a license compatible with the Commons project. Images of a living person will nearly always fail to meet the NFCI criteria. Images that do meet the criteria can be uploaded here (and only here, not on Commons), but you MUST correctly use the upload wizard, specifying it is non-free and why it meets the fair-use criteria and fill out the required information. This isn't an optional process - copyright is taken VERY seriously and as you've found out, is a quick way to get blocked. Saying you're going to continue to ignore it is not helpful and can lead to this account being blocked. Don't start down the road of block evasion. It will not end well. Ravensfire (talk) 20:04, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I already did so. But you keep taking it down. Maybe you can upload it instead Riah101 (talk) 08:41, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Hello, I'm Arjayay. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Mugdha Chaphekar, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 19:04, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Arjayay. I was trying to add content in an article, Mugdha Chaphekar. For her birth date. Google says her age is 35 which is actually false information. A few weeks ago Mugdha Chaphekar, in an event confirmed she is actually 32 years of age. Is there any way you can change this? Seeing as now her age is confirmed by herself Riah101 (talk) 21:57, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Mugdha Chaphekar, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 22:24, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Mugdha Chaphekar, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 22:13, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It’s not poorly sourced or false information. If Mugdha confirmed her age herself then it’s definitely true. Should be believe Google over that? Please see the clip which she confirmed she is 32 currently. And add this correct info on her wiki page Riah101 (talk) 15:03, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kumkum bhagya

What you want to add on that article, a poster give me the link where it was uploaded by production house, a twitter link or Instagram please don't give random google website link.Tousif ❯❯❯ Talk 04:51, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See the montage on this promo at the end uploaded by production house. This is the new montage. Upload this on the page please Riah101 (talk) 17:06, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://youtube.com/tTCcKad_oag

. Riah101 (talk) 17:07, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Reyhna Malhotra. Geniac (talk) 20:28, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://m.whosdatedwho.com/dating/reyhna-malhotra

here’s proof of her real age Riah101 (talk) 02:56, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That is not a reliable source for Wikipedia and should never be used in an article. Ravensfire (talk) 17:03, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Look. She is actually 40 years old. If you check articles she has confirmed she is 10 years older than her former partner, Zeeshan. And he is currently 30. So how can she be 32? Riah101 (talk) 19:51, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Abhishek Malik

Please add a source that supports divorce to the article. You can't add information like that without a source. Also, note that separation is not automatically the same as a divorce, so be specific and match what the source says. Ravensfire (talk) 18:25, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Titanic (1997 film). Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 13:53, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Your edit to Kumkum Bhagya has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. The4lines |||| ^{(Talk) (Contributions)} 21:56, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]