Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:
You cannot cite Wikipedia as a source on Wikipedia. If the he.wiki article has sources which can be used here, cite them instead.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kaplan Award and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, Ria Crabajales!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:02, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please help me with...
Hi. I wrote a draft on the Kaplan Award to use as a reference for an article I'm planning to write. Is there any way I could expedite the acceptance of this draft? Maybe remove certain parts for quicker verification? I would sincerely appreciate your help or advice on this. Thank you. Ria Crabajales (talk) 13:33, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There is no way to expedite draft review, but I think we need to discuss your reason for wanting to do so. As already mentioned to you above, Wikipedia articles should never cite other Wikipedia articles per WP:CIRCULAR. Instead, you can use the same reliable sources in multiple articles. For example, if Article 1 cites Source A for some fact, and you want to include that fact in Article 2, you should cite Source A directly, not Article 1. Bsoyka (t • c • g) 14:20, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much. To be honest, I'm helping my boss write an article and/or biography about his father who was one of the recipients of the award. He would like to use it as a quick reference and preferably in English. As I am not a Hebrew speaker and still a newbie here, it's hard to find reliable sources in English. So I really appreciate your guidance and patience. I'm hoping the ones I provided would be enough. If not, I'd be happy to receive feedback to make the revision. Thank you once again! Ria Crabajales (talk) 20:17, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
All the citations appear in the 'Among the recipients' section, which arguably isn't about the award, but about individual recipients. An award does not become notable by listing its recipients. We need to see significant coverage about the award itself, in multiple secondary sources that are both reliable and entirely independent of the subject and of each other.
The first section is entirely unreferenced, as is the infobox, as indeed is much of the 'Among the recipients' section.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kaplan Award and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AlphaBetaGamma was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kaplan Award and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
