User talk:Rhodydog/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Rhodydog. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Speedy deletion nomination of EasyGraph
You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.
Thank you.
A tag has been placed on EasyGraph, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of EasyGraph and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Woogee (talk) 01:54, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, EasyGraph, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EasyGraph. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Woogee (talk) 00:30, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
Spam
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page List of information graphics software do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Woogee (talk) 01:08, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
Ok I understand, I jut removed the direct link (Wasn't aware of the rules) Rhodydog (talk) 14:58, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to List of information graphics software. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Woogee (talk) 05:49, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is never a valid argument. Discuss this article only. You have yet to provide [[WP::RS|reliable sources]] as to what makes the software notable. It's being listed for deletion. If, once the deletion discussion has completed and the decision is not to delete the article, then, and only then, should you add it back to the appropriate articles. Woogee (talk) 18:48, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
The main complaint seems to hinge on whether EasyGraph is notable or not and whether reliable sources confirming this exist. As far as I know EasyGraph is the ONLY graphing application (listed at Wikipedia and beyond) that can propagate errors into the error bars and via arbitrary transformation functions. If it also unique in the way errors are entered into the data grid. It is true that other error propagation calculators exist (some are listed on Wikipedia) but none can do it graphically. I will assume you are an engineer and therefore understand the importance of error propagation in making certainty statements on derived quantities from experimental measurements and therefore recognized this notable feature. If you do know that one or more of the listed graphing tools can carry out error propagation (and your complaint suggests you do) then I will be pleased to know and will gracefully accept deletion of the item and will direct my students towards the tool you recommend. It you cannot, then EasyGraph is truly notable and I do not therefore see why it should be deleted and if it is I will consider it an act of vandalism. As for a reliable source, what constitutes such a source? Would a statement from a Professor of Engineering at a well known US University qualify? Rhodydog (talk) 04:42, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
- No. Reliable Sources require third party sources. Are there reviews from reputable magazines or websites? And you don't get to decide that deletion is vandalism if consensus at the deletion discussion goes against you. Note that I am not an admin, so I won't be doing the deleting. Deletion will get done at the end of the seven days of discussin on the AfD discussion page. Woogee (talk) 17:26, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
This is the final warning you are receiving regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you insert a spam link, as you did to List of information graphics software, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Woogee (talk) 17:27, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
There is no need to use threats (Especially since the offending link was removed sometime before you commented). *But* having read the notability in software essays Wikipedia:Notability (software) and Wikipedia:Software notability I see now that EasyGraph is not yet sufficiently 'notable' to warrant inclusion in the list (I still believe it is technically unique but not 'notable'). I've removed all content from the EasyGraph page but left the deletion notice. I think there are a fair number of titles in the list that fall into the same category and probably should be nominated for deletion. What do you think? Rhodydog (talk) 18:59, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
Image
My apologies. I had thought that this was an attempt to put a screenshot of copyrighted software as public domain. Thanks for clarifying. bibliomaniac15 21:57, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
Old Image
Old image located at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:EasyGraphExample.jpg
Enzyme Kinetics for Systems Biology
Are you the author of "Enzyme Kinetics for Systems Biology"? Carstensen (talk) 13:57, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 17:34, 11 May 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
§everal⇒|Times 17:34, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
File:EasyGraphExample.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:EasyGraphExample.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly hi! 19:51, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of TMSChart
The article TMSChart has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No indication of notability
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TexasAndroid (talk) 14:16, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
I do not recall what TMSChart is, in fact I don't remember anything about it, so you are free to delete it.Rhodydog (talk) 00:43, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Rhodydog. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Rhodydog. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
The article David Fell (Academic) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. reddogsix (talk) 03:44, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of David Fell (Academic)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on David Fell (Academic) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.brookes.ac.uk/templates/pages/staff.aspx?uid=p0054633. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. reddogsix (talk) 03:45, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
The article Edda Klipp has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. reddogsix (talk) 03:55, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Edda Klipp
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Edda Klipp requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.molgen.mpg.de/3477052/klipp. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. reddogsix (talk) 03:57, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Athel Cornish-Bowden
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Athel Cornish-Bowden requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-theoretical-biology/editorial-board/a-cornish-bowden. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. reddogsix (talk) 04:03, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
David Fell (Academic) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, David Fell (Academic), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Bradv 05:15, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
- I can do that, how many references would suffice? I believe he has over 190 publications with a h-index of 49, I could pick the top 10, would that be enough? My intention is to slowly build this page up. Rhodydog (talk) 05:24, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) No! We want three or four references to independent sources which attest to his notability. By all means list ten publications as well. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 08:35, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
Do you mean references that cite his work? Rhodydog (talk) 15:40, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Jannie Hofmeyr
Hello Rhodydog,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Jannie Hofmeyr for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
CentreLeftRight ✉ 05:42, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
August 2018
Hello Rhodydog. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Draft:David Fell (academic), and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Rhodydog. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Rhodydog|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. Bradv 16:25, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
I can assure you that my efforts are entirely voluntary, I am not paid to do this. I'm not sure how I can prove this to you however. Rhodydog (talk) 01:40, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:David Fell (professor) has a new comment
Your submission at Articles for creation: David Fell (professor) has been accepted
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Robert McClenon (talk) 04:37, 10 October 2018 (UTC)ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Rhodydog. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Athel Cornish-Bowden
Hello, Rhodydog. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Athel Cornish-Bowden".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 10:17, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Edda Klipp
Hello, Rhodydog. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Edda Klipp".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 11:27, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Jannie Hofmeyr
Hello, Rhodydog. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jannie Hofmeyr".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 11:33, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Athel Cornish-Bowden (August 4)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Athel Cornish-Bowden and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Athel Cornish-Bowden, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, Rhodydog!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 10:17, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
|
AfC notification: Draft:Athel Cornish-Bowden has a new comment
AfC notification: Draft:Athel Cornish-Bowden has a new comment
Sources
There are serious issues with the sourcing of David Fell (professor), the "Positions" section in particular. None of the cited sources support ANY of the content. Theroadislong (talk) 08:21, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Athel Cornish-Bowden has been accepted
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Theroadislong (talk) 20:56, 9 August 2019 (UTC)ArbCom 2019 election voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Copying licensed material requires attribution
Hi. I see in a recent addition to Elementary modes you included material from a webpage that is available under a compatible Creative Commons Licence. That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. It's also required under the terms of the license. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this licensing requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the future. — Diannaa (talk) 21:34, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for the feedback. You're right I just found the text in the preprint version of the paper, I hadn't noticed that. Out of interest, that text, in turn, was taken from some of my own lecture notes, which is where I actually got the text for the Wikipedia page. I would never have spotted that. (talk) 18:57, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
The article List of systems biology modelling software has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NLIST, lacks any reliable independent sources.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 01:26, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
- Dan, could you hold off on a deletion until I've added secondary sources. I should be able to that in the next 24 hours. Alternatively if you have the power to move the page to draft mode, then I would do that, and I can work on it from there? Rhodydog (talk) 02:47, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
- Dan, I have added quite a few secondary sources to each software tool in the main list and primary sources to the legacy list. Is this sufficient for you? I can add secondary sources to the legacy list if need be. Rhodydog (talk) 03:30, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
- I have removed the PROD notice but it still lacks a lead or description of what the article is actually about. Dan arndt (talk) 06:21, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for removing the deletion notice. There is a short lead on the page which I added last night but I can expand that. Rhodydog (talk) 16:23, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
- I moved the existing lead page to the top of the page and expanded it. Rhodydog (talk) 18:34, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
- I have removed the PROD notice but it still lacks a lead or description of what the article is actually about. Dan arndt (talk) 06:21, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
The new page SBCSL was meant to go via draft and review
I meant to publish SBCSL via a draft and review, but I just realized I created the document live. Apologies for that. If an admin wants to push it to draft mode so that it can be properly reviewed and critiqued, that is ok with me. 19:16, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: PySB (October 25)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:PySB and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Disambiguation link notification for October 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Metabolic control analysis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SBW. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: IBioSim (January 10)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:IBioSim and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at Articles for creation: PySB (January 20)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:PySB and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
- The article wasn't an advertisement, I'm not the author of the software, I was just trying to build a compendium of well known software in systems biology. Its ok to delete, I'm not going to argue with your decision. Rhodydog (talk) 03:55, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: PySCeS (January 23)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:PySCeS and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
- I have removed all the text from the capabilities section and refer readers to consult the primary and secondary sources listed at the end of the page. Rhodydog (talk) 17:27, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: PySCeS (January 23)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:PySCeS and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
- Academic software tends not to have news sources, instead academics rely on peer reviewed articles to gauge the importance of a given result which in turn is often the number of citations a paper receives. For example, the main publication for PySCeS has received 231 citations. For an academic publication that is a very high citation rate. Whether this makes the software notable is a question for Wikipedia editors. If they feel this is not notable and must require articles from the mainstream news then I suggest deleting this page because there aren't any such articles. I am not the author of the software and have no relationship with the software or use the software. Rhodydog (talk) 17:58, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
| This is an archive of past discussions with User:Rhodydog. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |