User talk:Rhino Ryan

Welcome!

Hello, Rhino Ryan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! The Bushranger _{One ping only} 23:01, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Arlene Hiss

On 9 December 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Arlene Hiss, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that A. J. Foyt praised Arlene Hiss for "what a fine job [she'd] done" after racing against her? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Arlene Hiss. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Arlene Hiss), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:02, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A cookie for you!

Arlene Hiss is an interesting article to read, thanks for all of your effort! Royal broil 13:54, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zina Spezakis for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zina Spezakis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zina Spezakis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Paisarepa (talk) 00:07, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Mayra Flores, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Please also note that these articles are subject to WP:DS. Do not reinstate them without adequate discussion and consensus. PRAXIDICAE🌈 21:05, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I included the category based off of the citation below, which has already been included in the article proper.

Link: https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/mayra-flores-texas-congress-qanon-1368616/ Rhino Ryan (talk) 21:09, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is not how we categorize people and also please read WP:RSP PRAXIDICAE🌈 21:13, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Hi Rhino Ryan! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Libs of TikTok that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. — Shibbolethink ^(♔ ^♕) 11:24, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Hello, I'm Blaze Wolf. I noticed that you recently removed content from The Good, the Bad and the Ugly without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 22:35, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm SomeNeatGiraffes. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Twitter Files, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. While the description "right-wing pundits" might not be entirely inaccurate, to make such claims requires the backup of one or more reliable sources. Moreover, their description as "journalists" and "author" is more descriptive about their line of work. — SomeNeatGiraffes (talk) 22:31, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Please have a look also at the information at this page, which appears every time you edit J. K. Rowling. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 12:51, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Russo-Ukrainian war. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

— Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 01:49, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently made edits related to Eastern Europe or the Balkans. This is a standard message to inform you that Eastern Europe or the Balkans is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 01:49, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently made edits related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. This is a standard message to inform you that articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 13:30, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning: Unsourced or poorly-sourced statements about living people

Hi, Rhino Ryan. I see you've received notes above about edits you made that edited unsourced or poorly-sourced statements about Matt Taibbi, Bari Weiss, J. K. Rowling, and Mayra Flores. I've just reverted another such edit you made, this one about Jennifer Sey. Please understand that Wikipedia takes content about living people very seriously, holding it to high standards of verifiability, neutrality, lack of original research, and source reliability. It is absolutely unacceptable to paraphrase a blog post someone wrote as "defend[ing] ... praise of Adolf Hitler", without citing any source that characterizes the statement as praise. On Wikipedia, primary sources must only be used for very straightforward claims about a subject. Adding your own editorial interpretation of what someone said violates all three of our core content policies: It is original research, it is unverifiable in independent sources, and it is non-neutral.

Given that you haven't replied to your previous warnings for similar issues, I want to stress this here: If you continue to make edits like this, the next step will be a request for action from an uninvolved administrator. I hope it does not come to that. I'll submit politely that if you find yourself unable to edit about a topic with requisite detachment, it may be better to edit about other topics instead. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe) 22:14, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In the future, if I write about something like a person's views, I will be certain to only refer to it as something cited by a reliable, secondary source. Rhino Ryan (talk) 03:25, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]