User talk:Rguyr

November 2023

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to AaAaAA!!! – A Reckless Disregard for Gravity—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 05:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

prove your a materialscientist. Rguyr (talk) 02:34, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Materialscientist i didn't understand the beginning of your message. Rguyr (talk) 02:12, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semiconductor

Hi! I saw you added a ^{[citation needed]} tag to the first sentence of Semiconductor. I started a discussion on the talk page regarding the definition: Talk:Semiconductor#Definition_of_semiconductor, please let me know what you think! Broc (talk) 10:07, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I reverted your edit on Extraterrestrial life as the source you added does not support the statement. Next time you add a reference, please make sure that it supports the statement in the article. Drop me a message if you need help. Broc (talk) 16:45, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Talk:07 Seconds or Less, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Broc (talk) 11:16, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

can you rename this to complaints or give me permission to rename this to complaints. Rguyr (talk) 02:22, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Jayden, you may be blocked from editing. Enough. Please stop adding your nonsensical talk page blurbs. We're not going to delete Jayden, we're not going to get rid of Wikipedia, Prime number is the correct title, and it doesn't matter to English Wikipedia if Wikispecies has an article on a particular species. Meters (talk) 00:48, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And we're not going to litigate a case over the use of Muggle. Meters (talk) 00:50, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

it served its purpose it had no reason to exist. are you using a bot i so tell me. Rguyr (talk) 02:19, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:I did not read any other drafts of this article so they cant efect this draft.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:I did not read any other drafts of this article so they cant efect this draft., requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jurta ^talk/_he/they 15:09, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:I did not read any other drafts of this article so they cant efect this draft.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:I did not read any other drafts of this article so they cant efect this draft. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at [[1]]. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Elijahr241 (talk) 02:23, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. However, in one of your recent edits, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. ''Flux55'' (talk) 03:58, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

can you provide me a link to the edit.@Flux55 Rguyr (talk) 03:05, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oof, I confused you with a vandal who was being didtuptive. Nevermind that. ''Flux55'' (talk) 03:09, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Please stop putting random/ joke words on your summary •Cyberwolf•talk? 18:13, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]