User talk:Rezwan Khair

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rezwan Khair (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. Place any further information here. Rezwan Khair (talk) 05:09, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You forgot to tell us your IP address, so we can't investigate your claim. You can use WhatIsMyIP to find your IP address. If you don't wish to provide this publicly, you may use WP:UTRS. Yamla (talk) 12:15, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rezwan Khair (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP Address is 10.47.241.38. Rezwan Khair (talk) 23:31, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That's not your external IP address. Please use WhatIsMyIP to find your IP address. Yamla (talk) 23:34, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Yamla: Sorry for disturbing you again. My Ip address is 116.58.205.195 and I'm not an open proxy. - Rezwan Khair (talk) 11:10, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That IP address is not blocked at this time. --Yamla (talk) 12:03, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is blocked by JamesBWatson.

@JamesBWatson: My Ip address is 116.58.205.195 and it is not an open proxy. - Rezwan Khair (talk) 18:47, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That IP address is not blocked, nor has it ever been blocked as an individual address. I thought it might be subject to a block on a range of IP addresses, so I checked the last 2000 entries in my block log, which took me back to March 2016. In that time I never made any IP address in the 116.58.x.x range, whether on an individual IP address or on a range. I wonder whether that may be the local address of your computer or local network, but the IP address that is reaching Wikipedia is the address of a proxy through which you are connecting: that is the only reason I can think of why you should come up with an address that is not blocked as your IP address while you are receiving a message from Wikipedia saying that your IP is blocked as a proxy. The message you see telling you that you can't edit should tell you the IP address that is reaching Wikipedia, and that is the one we need to know in order to consider your unblock request. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:54, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@JamesBWatson:, the message says, "Editing from 2A03:2880:0:0:0:0:0:0/34 has been blocked (disabled) by JamesBWatson." Besides, you should know that I use wikipedia through Free Basics. - Rezwan Khair (talk) 16:27, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clarifying that. Free Basics is an open proxy. That is to say it is a publicly available way of connecting to the internet which, instead of passing your own IP address to the target host (in this case the Wikipedia servers) it passes on a Free Basics IP address. That has the effect of hiding your true IP address from us, whether that was your reason for using the proxy or not. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:56, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well, now I hope that you will unblock my account as Free Basics is not illegal or prohibited. - Rezwan Khair (talk) 17:19, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that it is not illegal is irrelevant, as it is a matter of Wikipedia policy, not law. Wikipedia's policy on open proxies says "To maintain project security, administrators reviewing blocks involving open proxies should not unblock the IP address or range in question unless they are sure that there is no longer a functioning open proxy at that location", but it is clear that there is a functioning open proxy at the IP addresses in question. Unless you can provide a convincing special reason why you should be given exemption, you will not be able to edit via Free Basics. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:21, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I and many other wikipedians are enriching wiki using Free Basics, and we are not abusing it, not are we malicious users. So, there should be exception for Free Basics, like Tor. And what about Local exceptions? I hope the administrators will consider that. - Rezwan Khair (talk) 20:14, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mishu Chowdhury moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Mishu Chowdhury, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) In addition, there appears to be a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:41, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mishu chowdhury moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Mishu chowdhury, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE💕 18:34, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Rezwan Khair. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Mishu Chowdhury, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. – robertsky (talk) 21:22, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mishu Chowdhury has been accepted

Mishu Chowdhury, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— The Most Comfortable Chair 13:19, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mishu chowdhury

Hello, Rezwan Khair. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mishu chowdhury, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:00, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mishu chowdhury

Hello, Rezwan Khair. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mishu chowdhury".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:52, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Shoaib Shorbonam

The article Shoaib Shorbonam has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable author. Sources are a press conference for his web magazine launch and a book review in a newspaper he worked for. Searches in Bengali returned a few hits, but nothing deeper than capsule book announcements.[1][2] Does not meet WP:AUTHOR or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Worldbruce (talk) 15:59, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]