User talk:Reyrefran

Welcome! (We can't say that loud/big enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page.

We're so glad you're here! -- Essjay · Talk 09:13, 21 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Basketball

Hi! I've nominated the article on basketball for peer review at WP:PR with a view to it getting on WP:FAC and I thought you might be interested. Neonumbers 11:33, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Tookie_dead.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Tookie_dead.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 02:09, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Devin Reitsma

You recently copy-edited Devin Reitsma, I am of the opinion that the article is a hoax. --ArmadilloFromHell 05:39, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cities of the Philippines

Are sure Marawi and Cotabato are HUCs? --Howard the Duck 04:26, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RP cities and towns infobox

I reverted most of your edits since this is the English Wikipedia, we'd have to use the English translation on the infobox. If you want, you can add a local language parameter like the one used in Tokyo but for the sake of consistency, it has to be applied to each and every LGU. --Howard the Duck 05:57, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

99.5 RT

Hello. I just finished editing what you wrote about 99.5 RT. Much of what you put on that page is hearsay. Let me start off by saying I work for the on-air department of the station. I've spent a total of almost 12 years there, so I'd like to think my knowledge of the station and its history is accurate.

Real Radio Network is the name of the corporation that owns DWRT-FM. It is not a subsidiary of Quest Broadcasting. Quest is the owner of DWTM-FM and the provincial network of Killer Bee stations. Real Radio and Quest are two distintly different entities. The only thing they have in common is that both stations are overseen by a management consultancy group, The Radio Partners, Inc. Any reference to the contrary by other people, is mere misinformation.

DWKX-FM is owned by Advanced Media Broadcasting and is also overseen by The Radio Partners. Unlike K-Lite, RT is not reformatting. It will continue to be a CHR station in 2007. Posting rumors about us does not seem to be fair.

Please give us a call if you feel you need to clarify anything that pertains to our station.

RT's original owner is Trans-Radio Broadcasting Corp. and not Trans-Pacific. Get the facts straight, try asking next time. Some people who still work for DWRT-FM now, worked for the Tuasons as well. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Morpheuzzz (talk • contribs) 08:54, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Recent Speedy Tags

You applied {{db-bio}} tags to a number of Philippine reporter articles. Being a reporter can be in itself a claim of notability depending upon their viewership. As such, these articles are more appropriate for WP:PROD or WP:AFD and I have removed the speedy tags. Another user had tagged these with {{afd}}, but had never completed steps 2 or 3 of the AFD nomination process. Therefore, I had to remove those tags as well. Feel free to use PROD or AFD if you still believe these should be deleted. Let me know if you have any questions. Thank. -- JLaTondre 21:39, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Rock990.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Rock990.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 18:41, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits made to 97.1 Barangay LS

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Reyrefran! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 17:24, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hey, thanks for fixing my error on Randi Patterson. You'd think it wouldn't be that hard to do a simple copyedit, but it is for me. Appreciated. Ytny (talk) 23:13, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Recent Chicago Fire edits

I reverted your edits to the squad section for the Chicago Fire article. You added back in both that Cuauhtemoc Blanco is a free transer, and a speculative month in which he'd play in. The latter is subject to change because Chicago is letting him finish his season with America, and that could either be this month (April) or the next (May). Both Mediotiempo and Univision.com - both very reliable sources - say that he's being paid around $2 million to go to Chicago Fire. If you find a source that says he's a free tranfer, cite it. Otherwise, leave that section as it is. --DethFromAbove 15:47, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

97.1 Barangay LS

Put a website on the article 97.1 Barangay LS. Describe it as the petition so you can Have 97.1 Barangay LS. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dm955 (talk • contribs) 03:58, 6 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Big fm.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Big fm.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:21, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Xfm.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Xfm.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:09, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Migz Zubiri

See this: [1] Migz was nominated by Lakas-CMD under the TEAM Unity banner. --Howard the Duck 08:03, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Team Unity is not Political Party unlike the Genuine Opposition which a real political party but is a political coalition Rizalninoynapoleon 15:21, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do not revert, discuss first!

If you keep on reverting, you will be blocked for the violation of the 3 revert rule. Just a heads up.

And who told you the people of Bukidnon are more qualified than the COMELEC on matters of elections? --Howard the Duck 00:02, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Jerichopetilla.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jerichopetilla.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:35, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Sigaw967.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Sigaw967.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 21:27, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Edsagrab.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Edsagrab.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 09:42, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

About DWSS

I'm confused. I want to know if DWSS 1494 is owned by FBS Radio Network Inc. or Ultrasonic Broadcasting Systems, Inc.? Underblast (talk) 10:48, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Rock990.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Rock990.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:13, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict on Wikipilipinas about DZAM & DZAR

Is there a Radio Station like DZAM Commando Radio 1026? Is there a frequency like 1000 KHz in the Philippines? User:Lianlaspinas is the one responsible for doing DZAM Commando Radio 1026 & DZAR. Try fixing this problem in Wikipilipinas. Superastig (talk) 12:31, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Caretaker" mayor

Hello! Just a heads up, there is no such term as "caretaker" mayor. Under the Local Government Code of the Philippines (RA ), if a mayor leaves office or is removed from his position by legal means, the vice mayor takes over as mayor, normally in an acting capacity. See Chapter 2, Section 44 of the Local Government Code. I've edited all texts on the SJDM articles to reflect this information. Thanks. --- Tito Pao (talk) 04:37, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello?!?! Where is your head?!

Why'd you rename 2007-08 PBA PHILIPPINE CUP to 2008-09 UAAP Season in Chris Tiu's article?!?! What, do you think they MERGED into one league?! My God...At least I have the brains to actually edit it out...

Whoever you are, just want to remind you that personal attacks are not tolerated on Wikipedia. Please provide your feedback using a more civil tone. Thank you. --- Tito Pao (talk) 01:46, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Angelito Sarmiento and quoting from resolutions...

Hello! I left a note on the Angelito Sarmiento talk page in reply to your post there. Thanks. --- Tito Pao (talk) 01:46, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ABL

Hello! I realise you created the roster page. Well done! I'll do my part to update it with all the info that I can possibility find, from various sources.

But there's a slight problem.

Because the template is going to be for current squad, we will have problem once the season ends, and when the next season comes, the update done on the template will affect the previous season page.

I have thought of copying and pasting the template on the page, but that will cause trouble updating. Even if we do that at the end of the season, we risk losing some info should there be any changes to the roster in the middle of the season.

Just sharing my point of view, hopefully we can makes things better together here! Frankie goh (talk) 09:37, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Angelito Sarmiento redux

Hello! I've replied to your message on my Talk page. You can check out my reply here. Thanks! --- Tito Pao (talk) 01:42, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"City of..."

I noticed that you moved Carcar and Bogo to "City of Carcar" and "City of Bogo", but I don't see a discussion. Does anyone actually call them by those longer names? Per the general naming conventions and WP:PLACE, we should strive for the most commonly used names, even if they are the official names. Will Beback talk 07:51, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To take Bogo as an example, the article can't be moved to that name alone because "Bogo" refers to several different things, and the city is not the obviously predominant use. The name it had before, Bogo, Cebu, seemed adequate. Will Beback talk 09:56, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Elmer Espiritu.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Elmer Espiritu.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Angus McLellan (Talk) 21:18, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Afd on Daniel S. Razón

Hi, as a previous contributor to the Daniel S. Razón article, it may interest you to know that it is currently being nominated for deletion due to unnotability. You can find the Afd on this page Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Daniel_S._Razón. Thank you and Happy New Year! – Shannon Rose ^Talk 18:47, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Abiding by decisions

You were given enough time to present your arguments regarding Legislative district of Bacoor and Legislative district of Imus. But you didn't provide any more basis to keep the articles from being deleted. Don't resurrect something that has been decided upon. --Scorpion prinz ^{(Talk | contribs)} 07:20, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not recreate these two articles without having pursued the correct venues to overcome the previous discussion. such as deletion review. Otherwise you'll be blocked. My personal advice is to wait until the situation is crystal clear as reported in reliable sources.--Tikiwont (talk) 13:13, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Legislative district of Imus

A tag has been placed on Legislative district of Imus, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. --Scorpion prinz ^{(Talk | contribs)} 07:44, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Legislative district of Bacoor

A tag has been placed on Legislative district of Bacoor, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. --Scorpion prinz ^{(Talk | contribs)} 07:44, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Legislative district of Bacoor

A tag has been placed on Legislative district of Bacoor, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. A More Perfect Onion (talk) 20:57, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A More Perfect Onion (talk) 20:58, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop recreating articles deleted at AfD. If you wish to contest deletion, do so by taking it to Deletion Review but do not recreate them again. —SpacemanSpiff 20:57, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Legislative district of Dasmariñas City

You formatted the AFD wrong. And you seem to have mistaken Articles for Deletion for Articles for Merging. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 23:14, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You still formatted it wrong. Merge discussion will still involve a debate. In no way does this involve deletion. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 23:59, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Please stop recreating articles deleted by AfD. If you wish to contest deletion, take it up at deletion review. If you continue to recreate articles out of process, you may be blocked. —SpacemanSpiff 00:33, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for because you now have recreated the disputed legislative district articles eight times each, notwithstanding several warnings by different editors and page protection of the original titles, and without actually seeking out the suggested routes of resolution. The request on my page was incomplete and already posted after launching the latest series of recreations, then continued without waiting for an answer.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Tikiwont (talk) 10:48, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CIVIL

This edit is not acceptable. In the edit summary you refer to a fellow editor as "an asshole" (by asshole user...). This is not civil, it is a personal attack. Please read the relevant policies I've linked to, and do not make comments like this again.

TFOWR 11:50, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Template:Philippine legislative districts. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. TFOWR 17:51, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also at 15th Congress of the Philippines. I've warned both of you about 3RR. Stop reverting each other, discuss issues at the relevant talk pages, and wait until you have a agreement. If you're unable to agree, consider getting a third opinion or raising the issue at any relevant WIkiProjects. TFOWR 17:53, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Strikerevilla.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Strikerevilla.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:46, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Thailand Tigers logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Thailand Tigers logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:40, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Smbritama.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Smbritama.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 15:31, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jessie Castillo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jessie Castillo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessie Castillo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Moray An Par (talk) 05:22, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve 99.5 RT (defunct)

Hi, I'm Wakowako. Reyrefran, thanks for creating 99.5 RT (defunct)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. There is an existing article of the same radio station DWRT-FM. There might be a duplication of entry.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. —Preceding undated comment added 05:01, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from DWRT-FM into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Senator2029 “let's talk” 15:15, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Purefoods Tender Juicy Giants players

Category:Purefoods Tender Juicy Giants players, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. –H T D 04:11, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bacoor local elections, 2013

The article Bacoor local elections, 2013 has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Template:Roster listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Roster. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Roster redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Beerest355 Talk 16:50, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited DWTM, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DWET. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lipa local elections, 2016

The article Lipa local elections, 2016 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Local event without broader interest and no citations to support a claim of notability. Previous articles along these same lines have been PRODed already.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. KDS4444^Talk 14:08, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lipa local elections, 2016 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lipa local elections, 2016 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lipa local elections, 2016 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KDS4444^Talk 15:29, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Hello, I'm Walter Görlitz. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You made several changes of "head coach", which is the normal term in North America, to "manager". This goes against the club's own sources. Walter Görlitz (talk) 13:13, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Hi-Tech Bangkok City roster

Template:Hi-Tech Bangkok City roster has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 19:23, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Reyrefran. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Blu Star Detergent Dragons roster

Template:Blu Star Detergent Dragons roster has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 13:35, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of DWLW

The article DWLW has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references for ten years. Fails WP:V

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rhadow (talk) 15:05, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Reyrefran. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dino Daa for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dino Daa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dino Daa until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 18:43, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited DWWW, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DZBB (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tiger 22 Media Corporation

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tiger 22 Media Corporation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 22:56, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

Regarding speedy deletion-- Tiger 22 Media Corporation

Hello, Reyrefran. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. I'm sorry, but a page you created Tiger 22 Media Corporation has been deleted as meeting one or more of the Categories for Speedy Deletion.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects of articles must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources which are unconnected with the subject and which provide verifiable information. Someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject.

Any deficiencies should be remedied before reposting as they can lead to repeated deletions.

The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems.

If you want to try again, please use the Article Wizard or articles for creation to guide you through the creation process.

You may find this tool useful for finding sources: Google custom search

Don't feel discouraged. My first attempts at creating articles were deleted too. You can ask for help at the TEAHOUSE

There is more information at Wikipedia:Community_portal Cheers, and happy editing. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 22:58, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tiger22 logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tiger22 logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:48, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tiger22 logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tiger22 logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:04, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pharex B-Complex

The article Pharex B-Complex has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable defunct basketball team who last played 7 years ago.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ^{Babymissfortune} 12:56, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Reyrefran. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:PBL-Pharex B-Complex

Template:PBL-Pharex B-Complex has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:07, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:20, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sun Cellular's logo since February 2020.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sun Cellular's logo since February 2020.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:00, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rodriguez Rizal 2019.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rodriguez Rizal 2019.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:33, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of DWVM

The article DWVM has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Completely unsourced; failed WP:NBROADCAST

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:AirAsia Philippine Patriots roster

Template:AirAsia Philippine Patriots roster has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. fuzzy510 (talk) 15:42, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alex Covelo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Catalan. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Leni Robredo, you may be blocked from editing. Chlod (say hi!) 09:47, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've raised my points as to why VP Leni's article is being edited: to show that she is still a public figure in the Philippines and is still relevant through her Angat Buhay Foundation, which she chairs. I stand by my edits and I maintain that I'm not into disruptive editing, which you FALSELY accuse me of! Reyrefran (talk) 10:02, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Leni Robredo. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Note that other articles may be incorrect and cannot be used to justify edit warring. Sciencefish (talk) 12:34, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Reyrefran reported by User:Sciencefish (Result: ). Thank you. Sciencefish (talk) 12:40, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 20:53, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Reyrefran (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Reyrefran". The reason given for Reyrefran's block is: "Violation of the three-revert rule".

Blocking administrator: ‪Daniel Case‬ (talk • blocks)

Accept reason: Done. Yamla (talk) 10:51, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited City of Bacoor Government Center, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Bureau of Investigation.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Reyrefran (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Possible collateral damage, no known breach of Wikipedia after block on 10/23/2022 and have desisted from edit warring Reyrefran (talk) 08:59, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You will need to provide more information so we can look at your claim. If an IP address or other account name is provided, we need to know what it is. If you do not want to post your IP address publicly, you may use WP:UTRS to make a private unblock request. 331dot (talk) 10:15, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]