User talk:Rest west
An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Waterjuice (talk · contribs · logs). Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth |
An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Willydick (talk · contribs · logs). Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth |
An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Wastful (talk · contribs · logs). Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth |
Hello, Rest west. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Disruptive user. Thank you. ╟─TreasuryTag►senator─╢ 08:15, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
You don't seem to be here to build an encyclopedia
[edit]Your edits do not appear oriented on building the encyclopedia, which is Wikipedia's purpose of existence.
If you want to do that - you need to focus on articles, not random comments as you have been.
Even if you're not a sockpuppet of someone as suggested above, your editing pattern right now usually leads to being blocked from editing in a short while. If you came here intending to actually contribute, that's fine, but you need to get on with that. If you're just having fun... please see WP:NOT - we aren't a blog site or humor website, or social networking website. We're an encyclopedia. We don't expect people to not have any fun at all - but we do expect participants to be focusing on the encyclopedia as their purpose in being here.
Thank you. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 08:26, 21 November 2009 (UTC)