User talk:Waterjuice

Retired

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

Hello, Waterjuice, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- The Red Pen of Doom 16:41, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008

If you reference accurate articles, review former discussions, and even read the corporate website, you will indeed find that General Motors is the world's largest automaker as measured by annual sales for the last 77 years. tydwil3 (talk) 14:27, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

McDonalds logo and fast food

I noticed you added the McDonalds logo to the fast food article. I'd ask that you familiarize yourself with our non-free image policy WP:FU. For images that are not freely licensed (such as copyrighted logos), we have specifically guidelines telling us how those images can be used. We need to have a fair use rational on the image page explaining for each article why the image is used and why we think it qualifies as fair use. You added a non-free image to a page with no rational. Furthermore, non-free images are only supposed to be used minimally, and with a strong reason, and I don't believe there is any valid reason under these guidelines to include that image on the page. I really appreciate that you are volunteering your time here at wikipedia, and I only want to encourage you to become even more productive. So I'm only bringing this up as a friendly reminder of how we use non-free content here on wikipedia. If you have questions, feel free to ask. Thanks.-Andrew c ^[talk] 16:27, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

wow

First francais comment on any afd i have had the pleasure - merci beaucoup - or words to that effect Satu Suro 04:51, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On second thoughts and seeing comment below I'll retract that Satu Suro 05:05, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please use English

I noticed that you have posted comments to the page Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harold Hoehner in a language other than English. When on the English-language Wikipedia, please always use English, no matter to whom you address your comments. This is so that comments may be comprehensible to the community at large. If the use of another language is unavoidable, please provide a translation of the comments. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you. Hrafn^Talk_Stalk^(P) 05:03, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Muhamet Kycyku

You have not explained the reason of deletion of the page. Please clarifyBalkanian`s word (talk) 14:10, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry it was a misfire, oops. Waterjuice (talk) 14:13, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, would you then agree we close the AfD? Fut.Perf. ☼ 14:58, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

It is mine. I have changed my username.Balkanian`s word (talk) 16:48, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For you

I have seen you are an activist in the anti-vandalism cause and a great Wikipedian. So for you:

Barnstar of Thankfulness

I have seen you are an activist in the anti-vandalism cause and a great new Wikipedian. Hope you stay on Wikipedia with you great contributions. The New MIKE moral ^(contribs)

One of your edits to Texas

Hi Waterjuice,

I'm not sure what you intended to do with this edit, but some of the issues that you tagged the Texas article with didn't make sense — for example, the article does have a lead section, and it is not about a "work or element of fiction". I've undone the edit, but feel free to reinstate the tag with the actual germane concerns that you may have about the article. — TKD::Talk 06:36, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An explanation for your tag would be greatly appreciated here. Thanks Oldag07 (talk) 01:23, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcoming Users

Hi Waterjuice. I notice you have been welcoming a lot of new users recently. While this is nice, posting welcomes to users who may not ever edit Wikipedia clogs up the servers, occupies unnecessary space and is not generally needed. While your kindness is appreciated, perhaps save the welcomes to users who have already made a few good-faith edits? » \ / (⁂) 06:48, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

Re: How are my edits considered vandalism? I have asked for clarification, consensus, and am open to discussion. At no time did I remove information, but only added to. I have asked for your action to be reviewed.--207.114.206.48 (talk) 13:18, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bureaucrat clarification

I've reverted your edit to Wikipedia:Bureaucrats,[1] as there are a couple of problems. First, any autoconfirmed user can move articles. Secondly, any administrator can delete pages; this is not a right reserved to the bureaucrats. Thirdly, the distinction between bureaucrat and administrator should be considered chiefly a technical distinction; we're aren't "higher" than admins. EVula // talk // ☯ // 07:00, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please accept my apology? Waterjuice (talk) 07:03, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry about it; just a simple mistake. :) EVula // talk // ☯ // 07:07, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Yes, I do live in Vegas, and no about the sexuality. Vegaswikian (talk) 06:36, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Texas worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. I appreciate that you reverted your edit, but in the future please confine your tests to the sandbox. Dabomb87 (talk) 02:28, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I believe you are mistaken

While I did not mean to mark it as vandalism, I completely disagreed with what appeared to be drive-by tagging. Also, plz don't template the regulars. Soxwon (talk) 01:05, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My talkpage

If you ever feel the urge to post to my talk page please be specific regarding what edit you're referring to. If you can't or don't want to obey to this... we'll see. Anyway, just don't post there unless there is a valuable reason for it. Thanks, --The Magnificent Clean-keeper (talk) 01:37, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Waterjuice (talk • contribs) 08:09, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You've lost your pet. Don't let it happen again.--The Magnificent Clean-keeper (talk) 15:20, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Texas

Please stop by and discuss the reasons behind the tagging. Other editors, including myself, don't agree with your findings. I will undo the tags until then. Thanks, Postoak (talk) 02:51, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, there is a legitimate reason for reverting your edits. The reason was mentioned above and also at Talk:Texas. Is there a legitimate reason for this? [2]. Postoak (talk) 03:58, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Retired

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

October 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Bank of America, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 01:41, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Skanks of America

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Skanks of America, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Postoak (talk) 08:20, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

It has been established that you engaged in sockpuppetry by evidence presented here:
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Waterjuice, and you are therefore blocked indefinitely.
If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. The Magnificent Clean-keeper (talk) 22:17, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]