User talk:Rest in peace Technoblade you were a legend
January 2023
[edit]
Hello, I'm Equine-man. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to 🔌 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Equine-man (talk) 07:54, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Anger. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Equine-man (talk) 07:56, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
- ??? I don’t remember editing that page. Rest in peace Technoblade you were a legend (talk) 07:59, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at 😭, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Equine-man (talk) 07:56, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
- How’s it vandalism? It’s an emoji, so it should redirect to emoji. Rest in peace Technoblade you were a legend (talk) 07:57, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of User:Rest in peace Technoblade you were a legend
[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Rest in peace Technoblade you were a legend requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Lemonaka (talk) 08:36, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Contested deletion
[edit]This page should not be speedily deleted because... (Technoblade was a wonderful person who sadly passed away, and we should remember him and his legacy) --Rest in peace Technoblade you were a legend (talk) 08:38, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
January 2023
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:14, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Rest in peace Technoblade you were a legend (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
My edits were not disruptive. Please explain to me how they were disruptive.
Decline reason:
As per below. I think that the block was proper. 331dot (talk) 09:45, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- I can see that you're trying to shorten and fix things on various articles but the effect of your edits is to make things less clear (and introducing spelling mistakes). Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:19, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
How were they making things less clear? Can you please give me examples of this? Rest in peace Technoblade you were a legend (talk) 16:35, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
- I assume that you aren't a new user, if you chose your username to memorialize a deceased user? 331dot (talk) 09:47, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
- Technoblade isn’t a Wikipedia user, they’re a YouTuber who sadly passed away. How do you not know about him? Rest in peace Technoblade you were a legend (talk) 16:04, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
- Please see Technoblade if you somehow don’t know who he was. Rest in peace Technoblade you were a legend (talk) 16:07, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Rest in peace Technoblade you were a legend (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have now realized how they were disruptive. I was told that they make the article less clear and introduce spelling errors. I promise I will learn from my mistakes and improve my editing skills, so that I actually improve articles.Rest in peace Technoblade you were a legend (talk) 20:36, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Another Lina211 sock. Go away. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 20:40, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.