User talk:Researchsleuth

This is Researchsleuth's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elliott Tanner (October 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Elliott Tanner and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 17:24, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Thank you for the information. I have made the article more formal. I see where there were unnecessary words. Thank you for that feedback and tip. The subject does meet coverage qualifications, as much so or more so than other subjects, as listed in the edit box. Other similar subjects with Wiki pages include Carson Huey-You, Eugenie Carys de Silva, Michael Kearney, and others. Thank you! Researchsleuth (talk) 17:49, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Researchsleuth! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 17:24, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Draft:Elliott Tanner, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 17:46, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for bringing that to my attention. It was an oversight on my part. I appreciate the feedback. Researchsleuth (talk) 17:52, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Elliott Tanner has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Elliott Tanner. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 17:48, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elliott Tanner (October 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See the referencing tutorial at WP:INTREFVE. It is mandatory that you format the references following that tutorial.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Elliott Tanner and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 18:02, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I believe I fixed it. I appreciate your help. Researchsleuth (talk) 18:32, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No... you seem to have missunderstood the help, please remove the "nowiki" code that is stopping the references being properly visible. Theroadislong (talk) 18:53, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah yes, ok. Learning, thanks for your help and patience. I am an old man wanting to challenge myself by learning something new. I appreciate your time. Researchsleuth (talk) 19:04, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]