User talk:ReseARTch

Welcome!

Hello, ReseARTch! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{Ping|I dream of horses}} to your message. (talk to me) (contributions) @ 17:50, 17 September 2015 (UTC) Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Proposed deletion of Journal for research cultures

The article Journal for research cultures has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable new journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 07:14, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

• I agree, I cannot find this journal indexed on any selective databases and therefore does not meet WP:NJournals. Although I do not believe any art journals would be featured in the databases proposed in WP:NJournals. I disagree that there are no independent sources cited, the Austrian Science Fund, transmediale and ISEA are all reliable established independent sources that utilise rigorous peer review processes. However due to the newness of this journal I would also agree does not meet WP:GNG and therefore I agree with the proposed deletion and would recommend speedy deletion.ReseARTch (talk) 13:33, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

• Also thank you Randykitty for your interest, I am new to creating pages so first time I have logged in, obviously need a bit more practice with following WP:GNG. ReseARTch (talk) 13:43, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

• Creating new articles is one of the harder things to do here. feel for how things are done here and then it will become easier. As for the journal, if it is indeed supported by so many people, it should get good submissions, leading to citations, leading to it being picked up in Scopus, for example, and meeting NJournals soon enough. When that happens, drop me a note and I'll help you, if still necessary by that time, to write a good article on it. Meanwhile, I have deleted the current version per yuour request above. --Randykitty (talk) 21:10, 18 September 2015 (UTC)