User talk:Reprogram0871
Welcome!
[edit]Hi Reprogram0871! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 18:11, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Riddim (genre), it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 18:17, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
May 2023
[edit]
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Riddim (genre). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 21:28, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- I have provided my sources, yet they are still removing my post, despite not providing any cited disputed themselves. How can I proceed without getting flagged for edit war again? Reprogram0871 (talk) 21:42, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- Please read WP:RS. Forums do not qualify. Additionally, you need to properly WP:CITE the source with the addition of text, not just throw a bunch of links in your edit summary. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:21, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- I am happy to properly cite, but I provided more than forums:
- https://edm.com/interviews/subtronics-interview
- https://infektdubstep.com/trench/ Reprogram0871 (talk) 22:33, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- "Self-published expert sources may be considered reliable when produced by an established expert on the subject matter, whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable, independent publications"
- EDM.com and Infekt are both experts in the subject. Reprogram0871 (talk) 22:36, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- So far no one has contested my additional links. I would would like further analysis please. Reprogram0871 (talk) 22:46, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- Please read WP:RS. Forums do not qualify. Additionally, you need to properly WP:CITE the source with the addition of text, not just throw a bunch of links in your edit summary. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:21, 19 May 2023 (UTC)