User talk:Replypartyreplyparty

Welcome!

Hello, Replypartyreplyparty, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Anonymous Philippines, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! reddogsix (talk) 16:09, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Anonymous Philippines

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Anonymous Philippines requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 16:09, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Replypartyreplyparty, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!

The

Adventure

Hi Replypartyreplyparty!! You're invited to play The Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive game to become a great contributor to Wikipedia. It's a fun interstellar journey--learn how to edit Wikipedia in about an hour. We hope to see you there!

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:32, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rafael Lucio Nájera

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rafael Lucio Nájera requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rafael_Lucio_N%C3%A1jera Also badly translated. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bgwhite (talk) 05:13, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Glacier Miage

Hi, I'm Imaginatorium. Replypartyreplyparty, thanks for creating Glacier Miage!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This needs complete rewriting by a native speaker of English

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Imaginatorium (talk) 05:25, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Glacier Miage

Hello Replypartyreplyparty,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Glacier Miage for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, [[{{{article}}}]].

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Imaginatorium (talk) 05:35, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Malaygian Airlines Flight 370

Re this edit. why did you remove a valid redlink? The Royal Brunei Navy article clearly identifies the Darussalam class as an offshore patrol vessel. Mjroots (talk) 22:32, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop reinserting the UFO abduction stuff into the article ([1], [2]). So far, two different editors have removed that material, and I personally concur with them in their removal. If you believe the material belongs to the article, please discuss the matter at the article's talk page. Thank you.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 18:50, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Replypartyreplyparty, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. YSSYguy (talk) 14:36, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:14, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Malaysia Airlines Flight 370. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Acroterion (talk) 14:39, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did on Malaysia Airlines Flight 370. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 14:40, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at Talk:Malaysia Airlines Flight 370, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Repeated insults and taunting are not welcome. — The Hand That Feeds You:^Bite 22:27, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Acroterion (talk) 23:07, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ok i admit im here to observe all your behaviour in Wikipedia and assess if your really bullying would be editors its you choice if you want to ban me but it will only confirm your behaviour pattern now my group wants to wage war on your site but their waiting for my assessment and i don't care if you ban me im just letting you know we are watching you all very closely and don't force us to take action you would not like it your not NATO[[3]],so im advising all of you to take it easy you don't want a full scale hack war good day im not signing my name for its doesn't matter now so ban me will you lol

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used mainly for trolling, disruption or harassment. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Acroterion (talk) 23:29, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]