User talk:RemoteMyBeloved

November 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Dan Ticktum have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Dan Ticktum was changed by RemoteMyBeloved (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.912795 on 2021-11-29T11:18:08+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:18, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Lando Norris at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 01:42, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Lando Norris

Hello! Your submission of Lando Norris at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 18:16, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nico Rosenberg moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Nico Rosenberg, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DMySon (talk) 05:08, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emma Gilmour 2 (January 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Emma Gilmour 2 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Emma Gilmour 2, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 11:47, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RemoteMyBeloved! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 11:47, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Block Evasion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. SQL ^{Query Me!} 20:03, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mental health issues

I have severe mental health issues and online abuse is one of the main reasons. Please unblock me after the main block expires after two weeks. --RemoteMyBeloved (talk) 06:08, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Make an unblock request, and any uninvolved admin may absolutely lift this block without my input. You might want to explicitly specify which block you mean by 'the main block', and list any other accounts you might have. SQL ^{Query Me!} 07:44, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

By "the main block", I mean the IP account that got blocked for two weeks. After those two weeks expire, can I continue editing as an IP user or do I need to appeal the block on this account? --RemoteMyBeloved (talk) 11:33, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Which IP Address is "the main block"? You've edited from more than one blocked IP address. SQL ^{Query Me!} 13:39, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This one: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2A01:36D:1200:4D41:D9E6:E7D4:9D38:6C3C --RemoteMyBeloved (talk) 14:21, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RemoteMyBeloved (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am the IP user who was blocked for BLP violations, specifically ones on the page of a Turkish F1 driver. I have read WP:BLP and WP:NOR thorughly, and I promise to not edit with both my IP and this account. My other account, User:AndesGrain, was created as a joke, and I used it only on the Hungarian Wikipedia. I will mainly help in WP:OVERLINK-related concerns if I do get unblocked. If I don't, I guess that means I am not allowed to edit Wikipedia ever again, not even as an anonymous user.RemoteMyBeloved (talk) 08:17, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Probably a sock puppet of User:Ireadbooks12. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:30, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello,

Please allow me to talk to User:Asher Heimermann to apologize to him. --RemoteMyBeloved (talk) 12:00, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Nico Rosenberg

Hello, RemoteMyBeloved. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nico Rosenberg, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:01, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Nico Rosenberg

Hello, RemoteMyBeloved. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nico Rosenberg".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:16, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]