User talk:Remirez70

Interesting

You are making edits very similar to blocked and persistent sockpupetteer TheriusRooney aka ″TheriusBuzz″ aka ″TheriusSafari94″ aka ″KarymBorny″. And why you would out of nowhere bring up sockpuppetry in one of your edit summaries as you did here is quite strange. Forgive me if I don't think that this is coincidence. --TylerBurden (talk) 12:06, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I just correcting the incorrect pages. I'm not sockpupetteer.

That's what was said last time as well, so you just happen to be making the same edits in the same pages. I find it hard to believe. --TylerBurden (talk) 12:15, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Page correction based on facts is the most important thing and i won't be careless anymore.

Yes correct information on articles is great, so you agree that those accounts were yours? --TylerBurden (talk) 12:23, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No Tyler.

But you said ″I won't be careless anymore″. Which is also what TheriusRooney said in their unblock request. What do you mean you won't be careless anymore then? --TylerBurden (talk) 12:28, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Because i want to make wise page edit without careless and providing a reliable source that came from Google search.

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:TheriusRooney per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TheriusRooney. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Girth Summit _(blether) 14:22, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Remirez70 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to request unblock because i'm not violating editing rules and i'm wise editing and correcting pages. Remirez70 (talk) 14:49, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are blocked for violating WP:SOCK but have not addressed that. Yamla (talk) 15:12, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.