User talk:Relevant321

Welcome!

Hello, Relevant321, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Halkar, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! interstatefive (talk) - just another roadgeek 15:49, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Halkar

The article Halkar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to meet notability guidelines. Nothing about it shows up when you google it (front page is mostly filled with people whose last name is Halkar).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. interstatefive (talk) - just another roadgeek 15:49, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Hello, I'm Arjayay. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Srinagar have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk.
Please stop adding flags to places in the disputed territories, as consensus is that we do not add flags to places, districts, etc. in any of the disputed territories - Arjayay (talk) 21:50, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

why did you remove Indian flag label from all of the article. It administered by India.so we can use Indian flag don't remove like that Relevant321 (talk) 21:56, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

if this same logic can be remove flag from pok side also Relevant321 (talk) 21:59, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There are no flags in Azad Kashmir, Gilgit-Baltistan etc. for the same reason - Arjayay (talk) 22:01, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That I don't know , but here we have flag that we can use as wells pok is unilaterally capured by Pakistan. Relevant321 (talk) 22:06, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No flags or emblems as a result of the WikiProjects INDIA-PAK consensus of August 2019 Fowler&fowler «Talk» 00:59, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Kiu99 (talk) 13:42, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This also goes for unexplained removal of content in subsequent edits. Kiu99 (talk) 13:44, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Kiu99 (talk) 18:20, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Vanamonde (Talk) 22:28, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]