This is an archive of past discussions with User:Reedy. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
TypoScan
Happy new year! Is the TypoScan project still active? When I load the dll (v2.0.1.0), choose TypoScan as a source, and click "Make List", I get an error message stating: "Network access error - The remote server returned an error: (308) Permanent Redirect." Polygnotus (talk) 01:45, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
AWB graphical change proposal
Hi! I wish do a proposal for AWB's icon and loading screen. I have already sent a message in Wikipedia talk:AutoWikiBrowser/Dev. The original post : Hi, I wish do a proposal for a new logo for AWB. Here's my icons and images:
icon proposal for Wikipedia-useSoftware icon proposalWordmarkLoading screen
Greetings Reedy, I know you're busy but I wanted to let you know the Git hub repository for AWB is out of sync with Sourceforge and a few updates behind. I was hoping you could update that when you have time. Cheers! 74.96.23.235 (talk) 21:07, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nerd sniping until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
